100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: U.N. asked to weigh in on AZ. Immigration Law?!? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I don't think asking those who do not recognize civil rights in their countries to make a ruling on the civil rights issues or input on civil rights in the US comparing it to legalNillegal immigration which these people will probably understand better would probably rule in AZ favor unless of course they arebtrying to institute a world government......I don't think we should be a member of NATO at all The opinion being sought is from the United Nations Human Rights Council. They can't make a 'ruling' only give an opinion. N.A.T.O. (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a different organization. Where the United Nations is primarily political (intergovernmental) N.A.T.O. is a military alliance. btw It's the NATO treaty that has / had Canadian aircraft turning back Soviet aircraft during Cold War. DEW (Distant Early Warning) line is in Canada and I still remember the dawn patrols taking off at 0500hrs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think asking those who do not recognize civil rights in their countries to make a ruling on the civil rights issues or input on civil rights in the US comparing it to legalNillegal immigration which these people will probably understand better would probably rule in AZ favor unless of course they arebtrying to institute a world government......I don't think we should be a member of NATO at all The opinion being sought is from the United Nations Human Rights Council. They can't make a 'ruling' only give an opinion. N.A.T.O. (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a different organization. Where the United Nations is primarily political (intergovernmental) N.A.T.O. is a military alliance. btw It's the NATO treaty that has / had Canadian aircraft turning back Soviet aircraft during Cold War. DEW (Distant Early Warning) line is in Canada and I still remember the dawn patrols taking off at 0500hrs. Doesn't matter should not be a member of an international world council of any kind ...... talking good but its a type of organiztion the should not be..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sat 09/04/10 05:47 AM
|
|
White, unmarked Military vehicles being transported by rail are UN owned.
Look around outside and see if you start spotting them on or near Military bases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White, unmarked Military vehicles being transported by rail are UN owned. Look around outside and see if you start spotting them on or near Military bases. U.N. does nor 'own' any materiel including vehicles. Materiel is used / loaned by member nations for specific needs. Most commonly used by the troops of the nation loaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no "Human Rights" being violated, only U.S. laws. So the UN has no say in what the outcome is.
Oblowme is only taking it to the UN because he knows the vast majority of Americans are against his actions. So he takes it to "the rest of the world" so there will be more people on 'his' side. Things are going to get ugly over this...and when they do, I'll be laughing and smiling and helping to defend America, Arizona, and our borders from the illegal invaders who are nothing but dirtbags!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no "Human Rights" being violated, only U.S. laws. So the UN has no say in what the outcome is. Oblowme is only taking it to the UN because he knows the vast majority of Americans are against his actions. So he takes it to "the rest of the world" so there will be more people on 'his' side. Things are going to get ugly over this...and when they do, I'll be laughing and smiling and helping to defend America, Arizona, and our borders from the illegal invaders who are nothing but dirtbags!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I love to watch the 'blame-America-first' crowd jump all over themselves in an effort to say 'Ooooh! Me! Me first!' when it comes to throwing away our national sovereignty. The act of reporting an AMERICAN STATE to the UN for ANYTHING when there are places on the face of this earth like Chad, Rwanda, Uganda, Ethiopia, SudAfrique, Zambia, etc etc etc where human rights violations are just 'bid'ness as usual' is an affront to logic, common sense, fair play, and decency. Personally, I'd call it an act of treason, but I don't wanna get all pounded by the 'warm fuzzy feel-good' crowd ... Oh - wait - I think I just did call it an act of treason ... my bad ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is indeed an act of treason. The president of the United States intentionally, and illegally going against the laws of the United States and doing everything in his power against the Constitution and the people of the country.
That is treason...not acting in the best interest of the United States, and in fact, acting against it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is indeed an act of treason. The president of the United States intentionally, and illegally going against the laws of the United States and doing everything in his power against the Constitution and the people of the country. That is treason...not acting in the best interest of the United States, and in fact, acting against it. hes done nothing illegal, and treason is not defined as not acting in the best interest as that phrase is far too subjective to truly define,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 09/05/10 01:33 AM
|
|
'treason'
,,gosh that word gets thrown around more by people not understanding it than the word love does by people just wanting to get lucky that and 'impeach' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'treason' ,,gosh that word gets thrown around more by people 'impeach' Not a fraction as much as the words hatemongerers, raycists, bigots, ignorants, is slimed throughout every thread Progressive liberals disagree with. |
|
|
|
|
