100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: French First Lady a Prostitute cuz she condemns stoning? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Kill a man your a murderer..Kill many and your a conquer..Kill them all your a god. That is muslim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kill a man your a murderer..Kill many and your a conquer..Kill them all your a god. That is muslim that could apply to any religion or political system actually isnt that how history books are written,, by the stories of 'conquerors'? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. exactly why I dont play the blame game,, of course someone always has PRIMARY responsibility(blame) , but rarely have others not played a part by their choices,,,, really? so there is NO validity to understanding the REASONS behind peoples actions,, are they just acting impulsively at random? so if it can be shown that adults who have grown up in abusive homes are more likely to be abusive than those who havent, would such a study be EXCUSING the abusive behavior? I think it is actually helpful to implement actions that would help prevent the LIKELIHOOD of such behavior in the future.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad. 
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. so I guess I will wait until this man is caught before it is enough of an 'issue' http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm we dont throw rocks, but we will riddle them with BULLETS or electrical current,,,,, arent we wonderful,,,lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. so I guess I will wait until this man is caught before it is enough of an 'issue' http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm we dont throw rocks, but we will riddle them with BULLETS or electrical current,,,,, arent we wonderful,,,lol Not for cases of adultry of of the moral code. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. so I guess I will wait until this man is caught before it is enough of an 'issue' http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm we dont throw rocks, but we will riddle them with BULLETS or electrical current,,,,, arent we wonderful,,,lol Not for cases of adultry of of the moral code. so what is the debate , that we are somehow better because our 'death penalty' doesnt apply to adultery, but does apply to treason? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. so I guess I will wait until this man is caught before it is enough of an 'issue' http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm we dont throw rocks, but we will riddle them with BULLETS or electrical current,,,,, arent we wonderful,,,lol Not for cases of adultry of of the moral code. so what is the debate , that we are somehow better because our 'death penalty' doesnt apply to adultery, but does apply to treason? It applies in grave circumstances where there is a loss of life or potential loss of life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. so I guess I will wait until this man is caught before it is enough of an 'issue' http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm we dont throw rocks, but we will riddle them with BULLETS or electrical current,,,,, arent we wonderful,,,lol Not for cases of adultry of of the moral code. so what is the debate , that we are somehow better because our 'death penalty' doesnt apply to adultery, but does apply to treason? It applies in grave circumstances where there is a loss of life or potential loss of life. but I thought we shouldnt be held responsible for what OTHERS choose to do,, so which is it is treason a punishable by death offense because it could mitigate a situation where death occurs? and if that is the case, would not the death for a death philosophy the EXTREMISTS hold be just as well as their philosophy that our policies might MITIGATE situations where death occurred? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. so I guess I will wait until this man is caught before it is enough of an 'issue' http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm we dont throw rocks, but we will riddle them with BULLETS or electrical current,,,,, arent we wonderful,,,lol Not for cases of adultry of of the moral code. so what is the debate , that we are somehow better because our 'death penalty' doesnt apply to adultery, but does apply to treason? It applies in grave circumstances where there is a loss of life or potential loss of life. but I thought we shouldnt be held responsible for what OTHERS choose to do,, so which is it is treason a punishable by death offense because it could mitigate a situation where death occurs? and if that is the case, would not the death for a death philosophy the EXTREMISTS hold be just as well as their philosophy that our policies might MITIGATE situations where death occurred?  Things arnt as complicated as you make them out to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least the government doesnt sanction it,,,,I guess their media has its nutcases too Precisely HOW does the 'government' not sanction this when the 'government' [sic] CAUSES it to happen by their 'decree' ... ? Logic, please ... like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? possibly, but back to the point they didnt sanction the comments about the ex model , french first lady "like american 'decree' causes terrorists to become terrorists? either they want to be a terrorist or they don't...no one causes anyone to be a terrorist...the blame game dosn't work like that... when the nutsacs kill abortion doctors, is the doctors fault? i think not...was it the people in the buildings fault when mcviegh and the mulims destroyed the 3 buildings? again, no... just by even acknowledging the its the governments fault, your just encouraging more terrorist acts. playing the blame game does not work with terrorists. hey, if a governments actions can make a newspaper post bigotry,,it follows it probably can make (militant patriots.extremists, or whatever you want to call them) feel justified in taking a life for a life... I agree the logic is faulty, but its consistent i just see it as it is no ones fault but the terrorists...everyone is supposed to be in control of their own mind. 2 wrongs don't make a right. and killing innocent people is never right. Especially for adultry. Hell using their logic, Bill Clinton would have been stoned like 30 times, so mabye it's not so bad.
hmm, is not the potential penatly for TREASON, death? different cultures value different things, usually upon a consensus in america, if you commit treason, you probably know the consequence if you are caught so too is the case with muslims in whatever country they reside,, they know the consequence before they CHOOSE the action Being no one has ben sentenced to death over treason since WW2, it's not an issue.
Besides we dont throw rocks at people until they die. so I guess I will wait until this man is caught before it is enough of an 'issue' http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm we dont throw rocks, but we will riddle them with BULLETS or electrical current,,,,, arent we wonderful,,,lol Not for cases of adultry of of the moral code. so what is the debate , that we are somehow better because our 'death penalty' doesnt apply to adultery, but does apply to treason? It applies in grave circumstances where there is a loss of life or potential loss of life. but I thought we shouldnt be held responsible for what OTHERS choose to do,, so which is it is treason a punishable by death offense because it could mitigate a situation where death occurs? and if that is the case, would not the death for a death philosophy the EXTREMISTS hold be just as well as their philosophy that our policies might MITIGATE situations where death occurred? Things arnt as complicated as you make them out to be.
maybe not, but not as simple as others make them to be either difference is Im willing to see the truth might be somewhere in the middle,,, |
|
|
|
|
