HARTFORD, Conn. -- Richard Blumenthal's words are haunting him again.

Already forced to apologize for saying he had served "in" Vietnam in the Marine Reserve rather than stateside, the state attorney general's campaign for U.S. Senate is now being challenged to explain his assertion that he had "never taken PAC money" and has "rejected all special interest money."

Federal records show that he has accepted $480,000 in political action committee money since he made that claim in January. Moreover, his Republican opponent, former World Wrestling Entertainment CEO Linda McMahon, points to nearly $17,000 Blumenthal received as a state legislative candidate in the 1980s -- a figure Blumenthal's campaign does not dispute.

Blumenthal's campaign insists he did not lie -- as McMahon says -- when he said in an interview on MSNBC the day after he announced he was running for the seat of retiring Sen. Chris Dodd that he had never taken PAC money. His campaign says he was referring only to his 20 years as attorney general.

The context of the interview was the race for the Senate seat and how expensive the campaign would be. During the interview, Blumenthal was shown a clip in which McMahon said she would commit whatever personal money was necessary to win because she did not want to take special interest funds.

Blumenthal was then asked how tough the race would be -- and how expensive.

"I've never taken PAC money, and I have rejected all special interest money because I have stood strong and taken legal action against many of those special interests," he responded.

When pressed again on how much the race might cost, Blumenthal said it was too early to tell but said he was going to run a "very grass-roots campaign" and seek fundraising "from ordinary citizens."

Since then, McMahon, a political newcomer, has spent more than $20 million flooding voters' TV sets and mailboxes with ads to boost her name recognition and secure the GOP nomination, and has said she'll spend as much as a total of $50 million of her own money on the race.

And Blumenthal has seen his lead over McMahon shrink in the polls. A Jan. 14 Quinnipiac University poll showed Blumenthal leading McMahon 64 percent to 23 percent. By Aug. 4, that had narrowed to 50-40, with Blumenthal still hanging onto the lead.

Challenges to his credibility are new for Blumenthal, who has spent two decades with high popularity ratings as he groomed his reputation as Connecticut's advocate for consumers.

"Dick Blumenthal. He's not who we thought he was. Apparently, Dick Blumenthal will say anything," reads a McMahon campaign mailer sent to Connecticut voters this week, which highlights the PAC issue. She's also running a TV ad featuring two women sarcastically saying how shocked they are that "Blumenthal misspoke again."

Blumenthal's campaign has denounced the ad as untrue and vehemently denies Blumenthal was trying to mislead anyone, saying he was referring only to his runs for state attorney general during the MSNBC interview.

"They are taking something completely out of context to distort his record and try and tear him down," Maura Downes, his campaign spokeswoman, said of McMahon's campaign. "He was talking about his attorney general races, and he was crystal clear about that."

Blumenthal's campaign responded Friday to the criticism with a TV spot that refers to "Linda McMahon's latest attack ad," which questions how he can fight special interests by accepting PAC money. In Blumenthal's ad, the announcer says, "Doesn't she get it? Dick Blumenthal will always stand up to the special interests," and then highlights some of his high-profile cases involving big tobacco and pharmaceutical companies.

Rich Denesha, 30, of Norwich, said he has heard Blumenthal is an effective attorney general who has taken on special interests. But after hearing about the candidate's misstatements about Vietnam -- words he later apologized for -- and his comments about never taking PAC money, Denesha said he thinks Blumenthal is now playing politics.

"If he's going to do this to get elected, why am I going to be led to believe he's going to do anything different once he's elected?" said Denesha, a registered Republican.

McMahon campaign spokesman Ed Patru says Blumenthal has a "troubling habit of being untruthful," an image her campaign has been systematically trying to paint of the Democrat.

In response, Downes said: "People know Linda McMahon's not qualified to be their U.S. senator, and all her money and phony attacks can't change the truth that Dick Blumenthal will always stand up to the special interests and fight for the people of Connecticut."

Downes said Blumenthal is adhering to self-imposed limits on accepting political contributions.

For example, she said, he is not accepting money from people who work in the attorney general's office or lawyers it hires as outside counsel. He is also taking no donations from individuals connected to companies under investigation by his office, or in litigation with his office.

Among the PAC contributions to his Senate race, there are groups Blumenthal's office has dealt with as recently as 2009 and 2010. For example, federal records show his campaign received $10,000 from the PAC organized by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. As recently as Thursday, Blumenthal was urging jet engine maker Pratt & Whitney to reconsider its plans to lay off 129 union workers at its Cheshire plant.

In January, his office argued in federal court for an injunction blocking the transfer of another 1,000 jobs out of state.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/22/connecticut-senate-candidate-forced-explain-pac-donations/?test=latestnews

Finally a Republican who shares my views on tolerance of Gay marriage and Equal rights for gay's and lesbian's and getting rid of don't ask don't tell. Not to mention the pro-choice thing. I personally think abortion is wrong, but I don't think the government should have the choice.

She, hopefully is the future of the Republican Party.

Not to mention she has a history of creating hundreds of thousands of jobs worldwide, and building up and running one of the most successful companies in the world. Not to mention she has her husband Vince to fall back on who is a very savy businessman and very close friend Donald Trump who has a history of creating jobs and helping people out.

She is the logical choice, especially when her opponent keeps getting caught in lies. Lying about his service record, that should have got him kicked out of the race. Now this on the PAC's.

The choice is clear.

...and the race continues

if actors can run, why not sports entertainment moguls


she may be the better candidate when all the crap hits the fan,,,,she may not



time will tell

Let's see, a self made candidate who is a billionaire and has a proven record of creating jobs or a candidate who constantly keeps getting caught in lies.

Tough choice.

she is actually a very intelligent woman... i don't know how she will be in politics, but i've always respected her.

I dont know about self made, she MARRIED into a wrestling family

but in any case, financial successes dont automatically make for publicly connected , well grounded, candidates


not saying whether she is or isnt, just saying it will take more information than her happening to have made good decisions to profit her family(most of us try to do that)


I think people put too much emphasis on what people have instead of what people have DONE, sacrificed, how well they have remained connected to the achievements and struggles of OTHERS,,,,etc,,,

she was the chairperson of the wwe for quite a few years...any success they have had has a lot to do with her. it is vinces baby, but she did a lot for the show herself. and any woman that can take a stone cold stunner is ok in my book.

In Blumenthal's case, Joseph Heller must have had him in mind when he said this ...

"Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them."
~ Joseph Heller

Ummmmmm SHe was the #2 person in the WWF\WWE right behind Vince Mcmahon. She helped him build the business, It was in financial trouble not only when Vince took it over from his father but also in the late 90's. Both times she was activly involved in restructuring the company. She didn't just marry into it and thats her claim to fame.

wasnt aware anyone was privy to the financial documents of WWE,, but like I said,, whether or not or how much she was involved in growing the company or employing others,,,,,,time will tell how well she would be able to handle the POLITICAL position she is running for

If you don't vote for Linda, then HHH will come and pedigree your azz!

IM scared,,lol

they fight(act) well in a ring, but outside of it,, might find a different situation altogether




and anyhow, I preferred the rock ,,,,,,,but it doesnt mean I would elect him to political office

don't worry... HHH is on hiatus right now... DO YA SMELLLLLLLLLL what the rock is cookin...

You don't need to be privy to the finsancial documents to know this stuff. I was a HUGE fan of the WWF in the late 80's and early 90's. I've seen the behind the scenes interviews about how when Vince and Linda took over the operation it was a small east coast company with MANY competetors that had the edge over them. They could only book certain venues and no major station would pick them up.

Then again in the 90's when the WWE lost all most all of it's stars Including Hulk Hogan, Randy Savage, Kevin Nash, Scott Hall and many more to Ted Turners WCW. WWE's rating's dropped and the company almost crashed and once again Vince and Linda pulled through and not only eliminated the WCW as competition but now own the WCW as well/

I'd be more afraid of Steve Austin, Kane or The Undertaker.

The Rock?!?

Nope it's all about the classics, Hulk Hogan, Randy Savage, Ric Fliar, Mr. Perfect, the old Undertaker and Shaun Michaels, Ulimate Warrior, Money Inc, the natural disasters and the Bushwackers.

HHH has beat them all...hes an 11 time world champion

Yea he's on hiatus, he's about to have kid #3 with Vince and Linda's daughter.

yea, he's been with stephanie for a long time now. all the mcmanns have left the ring, every now and then, vince comes back and messes things up. AND IF YOUR NOT DOWN WITH THAT.... I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA

Stephanie is so fricking gorgeous. Triple H is one lucky man.

Vince is getting to old to be getting into the ring.........

Watch this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yNmTwcZA-Q

This is my favorite match\script that happened in Wrestling. Let's see if you guys can guess why.