Topic: Hamas Supports Ground Zero Mosque
no photo
Thu 08/19/10 08:29 AM
WTF does 'Zionist' have to do with ANYthing? Take it outside.

AndyBgood's photo
Thu 08/19/10 09:16 AM

I saw on the news last night that the so called funding for this mosque is non-existant. They have no money to build anything. So once again, this is just a bunch of zionists making a molehill out of nothing.

I also heard a republican strategist make a very observant comment. They won't build this mosque, they'll need "union labor" to get anything built in NYC, do you think they'll be able to hire some to build it? We're talking the same guys that helped remove the rubble from the WTC.

Some people just never think anything through or do research before they get pissed off. No money, no labor equals no mosque.


This has to be the most ignorant thing I have read yet. ZIONISTS? Dude... I may date Jewish women but I am 100% Goyum and your statement is very ignorant of the issue. Blame Jews for the hatred of the idea of putting a Mosque in the shadow of an Islamic based disaster?

I suppose you wear red suspenders and have a swastika flag flying in your living room too?

I suppose next you are going to call NY Hymie-town too?

AndyBgood's photo
Thu 08/19/10 09:22 AM
PS Islamics can come up with a lot of money fast and the project has to have funding before being proposed. There is a powerful financial district here that is Islamic. You underestimate the power of money.

Union Labor in NY? Wiggle enough money in front of those azzholes and they will jump like poodles through flaming hoops no matter how bad in taste the project is. We are talking about the 'Sell Out' capital of America.

Congressman Weiner (Dem) sure has not had anything to say about this yet he sure got all pissed off when his little package for victims of 9-11 got quashed for the blatant attempt at Tweed style politics and profiteering got busted up. Where is that Pu$$y's big mouth now? Liking his wounds he got "cheated" out of making millions on getting his little thingy voted in in the name of "helping" victims.

The money is there. Don't delude yourself.

willing2's photo
Thu 08/19/10 10:48 AM
Got 4 questions for supporters of the Muslim Mega-Mosque.

#1. Would you allow a Shinto shrine at Pearl Harbor?

#2. Would you allow a Nazi meeting hall at Auchwitz?

#3. Would you allow a KKK meeting hall at the King Center?

#4. Would you allow them Sharia Law in the United States?

RoamingOrator's photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:24 PM


I saw on the news last night that the so called funding for this mosque is non-existant. They have no money to build anything. So once again, this is just a bunch of zionists making a molehill out of nothing.

I also heard a republican strategist make a very observant comment. They won't build this mosque, they'll need "union labor" to get anything built in NYC, do you think they'll be able to hire some to build it? We're talking the same guys that helped remove the rubble from the WTC.

Some people just never think anything through or do research before they get pissed off. No money, no labor equals no mosque.


This has to be the most ignorant thing I have read yet. ZIONISTS? Dude... I may date Jewish women but I am 100% Goyum and your statement is very ignorant of the issue. Blame Jews for the hatred of the idea of putting a Mosque in the shadow of an Islamic based disaster?

I suppose you wear red suspenders and have a swastika flag flying in your living room too?

I suppose next you are going to call NY Hymie-town too?


Zionist can refer to both Christians and Jews alike (same god moron).

Nazi's are Christians.

Nazi's are also opposed to Islam.

NYC is dump, so I don't care what you call it.

My friends call me Hymie, so it isn't an insult to me.

Only Red Green wheres suspenders as far as I know.

If you're so effin smart, what is another term for Christians who hate Islam specifically because it's not their religion? I'm pretty sure it's Zionist. Read a little from sources other than the internet, and maybe you can get an education.

I dare you to come to my hometown and call me a Nazi to my face, lost two Uncles in WWII. I'll send you the address personally.


RoamingOrator's photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:30 PM
You guys are the ones opposed to:

1 Freedom of Religion

2 Freedom of Speech

3 Private Property Rights



And I'm the Nazi...


It's called a history book, read one sometime.

msharmony's photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:36 PM

Got 4 questions for supporters of the Muslim Mega-Mosque.

#1. Would you allow a Shinto shrine at Pearl Harbor?

#2. Would you allow a Nazi meeting hall at Auchwitz?

#3. Would you allow a KKK meeting hall at the King Center?

#4. Would you allow them Sharia Law in the United States?



1. Yes, if there were a community of americans there with japanese heritage and a precedent of other shrines in the area already.

2. Not my business, I am not polish.

3. Yes, but would not like it. I, for the record, think its a false comparison to equate the hatred of the miniscule movement of america called KKK with the religion of billions around the world. I doubt the KKK would be trying to reach out to black folks, and I doubt they would be building a center that was open to everyone.


4. Yes, as it applies only to muslims AND noones religious beliefs trumps the laws of the land. If some people wish to use their religion to extract their own brand of justice or punishment(for whatever reason) , let them contend with the mandates of the government where they live.


s1owhand's photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:47 PM

You guys are the ones opposed to:

1 Freedom of Religion

2 Freedom of Speech

3 Private Property Rights



And I'm the Nazi...


It's called a history book, read one sometime.



Just because someone does not think building an Islamic Center so close to
the WTC Islamic massacre site is distasteful it does not make them against
freedom of religion, freedom of speech or private property rights.

Think about it.

whoa

Just people who think it is a bad location and ill-advised decision.

no photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:50 PM
'Zionist' is a term reserved for use by those who fit the descriptor of 'assshat' ...

willing2's photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:50 PM


4. Yes, as it applies only to muslims AND noones religious beliefs trumps the laws of the land. If some people wish to use their religion to extract their own brand of justice or punishment(for whatever reason) , let them contend with the mandates of the government where they live.



Sharia isn't religion. It is a creeping Law they wish all to abide by.

In Europe last year. The courts decided domestic violence complaints filed by Muslim women were to be ignored and Police would not respond. Shariah takes care of it.

Canada is on the verge of the same application.

We are next.

no photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:53 PM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Thu 08/19/10 12:54 PM



4. Yes, as it applies only to muslims AND noones religious beliefs trumps the laws of the land. If some people wish to use their religion to extract their own brand of justice or punishment(for whatever reason) , let them contend with the mandates of the government where they live.



Sharia isn't religion. It is a creeping Law they wish all to abide by.

In Europe last year. The courts decided domestic violence complaints filed by Muslim women were to be ignored and Police would not respond. Shariah takes care of it.

Canada is on the verge of the same application.

We are next.


The 'imam' who supports this 'mosque' and refuses to investigate ANY OTHER SITE is the same person who wants the U. S. to become more 'Sharia-compliant'. He can kiss my pink 'n white asss ... as can any and all other supporters of 'sharia' and this 'mosque' ...

msharmony's photo
Thu 08/19/10 12:58 PM



4. Yes, as it applies only to muslims AND noones religious beliefs trumps the laws of the land. If some people wish to use their religion to extract their own brand of justice or punishment(for whatever reason) , let them contend with the mandates of the government where they live.



Sharia isn't religion. It is a creeping Law they wish all to abide by.

In Europe last year. The courts decided domestic violence complaints filed by Muslim women were to be ignored and Police would not respond. Shariah takes care of it.

Canada is on the verge of the same application.

We are next.



Is there ANY VALID FACTUAL Information to back up those claims or is it more politics of fear as usual?

anyway,,,the bullying may have been successful anyhow making this continuous nonsense pretty much at its end

http://www.haaretz.com/news/international/muslim-leaders-to-abandon-plans-for-ground-zero-community-center-1.308426

Atlantis75's photo
Thu 08/19/10 01:11 PM
Just browsing through the political section here is pretty much about one thing: Muslims.

Go ahead browse around. What muslims gonna do or not do and of course Obama and how he is a muslim and communist in one and everything is horrible.

I'm gonna advise the mingle administration to re-name this section to something else, like "Obama and muslims" instead of "Politics and Current news".


msharmony's photo
Thu 08/19/10 01:12 PM

Just browsing through the political section here is pretty much about one thing: Muslims.

Go ahead browse around. What muslims gonna do or not do and of course Obama and how he is a muslim and communist in one and everything is horrible.

I'm gonna advise the mingle administration to re-name this section to something else, like "Obama and muslims" instead of "Politics and Current news".




agreed

willing2's photo
Thu 08/19/10 01:12 PM
Edited by willing2 on Thu 08/19/10 01:13 PM




4. Yes, as it applies only to muslims AND noones religious beliefs trumps the laws of the land. If some people wish to use their religion to extract their own brand of justice or punishment(for whatever reason) , let them contend with the mandates of the government where they live.



Sharia isn't religion. It is a creeping Law they wish all to abide by.

In Europe last year. The courts decided domestic violence complaints filed by Muslim women were to be ignored and Police would not respond. Shariah takes care of it.

Canada is on the verge of the same application.

We are next.



Is there ANY VALID FACTUAL Information to back up those claims or is it more politics of fear as usual?

anyway,,,the bullying may have been successful anyhow making this continuous nonsense pretty much at its end

http://www.haaretz.com/news/international/muslim-leaders-to-abandon-plans-for-ground-zero-community-center-1.308426

I am offended by your false claim of fear tactics.

You might believe there is nothing bad about women or children suffering at their hands but, many of us just won't stand by like a "Pacifist" and just allow the atrocities.

Everything I post about Sharia comes from investigation. If it causes you fear, let it be from the reality of a creeping evil, woman and child abusive Law that is slimming it's way into our system.

I lied. It was 2 years ago for Europe.

Revealed: UK’s first official sharia courts
Abul Taher

ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.

The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.

Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article4749183.ece

no photo
Thu 08/19/10 01:20 PM
It's easier to be a 'pacifist' and a 'liberal' ... y' don't have to DO anything ... y' just have to be 'sensitive' and 'feel' things ... no action needed except feigning emotional outrage and false 'hurt' ... It's the reason 'liberals' and 'progressives' love 'political correctness' - it allows them to bully others who say things they don't like to hear into submission and control the content of the discussion - Control the words, control the thoughts ... simple premise, and they just hope no one sees thru it to expose their real agenda ...

Atlantis75's photo
Thu 08/19/10 01:21 PM
Edited by Atlantis75 on Thu 08/19/10 01:21 PM



The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.

Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article4749183.ece


quoting from your article:

Jewish Beth Din courts operate under the same provision in the Arbitration Act and resolve civil cases, ranging from divorce to business disputes. They have existed in Britain for more than 100 years, and previously operated under a precursor to the act.



msharmony's photo
Thu 08/19/10 01:22 PM
In the six cases of domestic violence, Siddiqi said the judges ordered the husbands to take anger management classes and mentoring from community elders. There was no further punishment.

In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article4749183.ece

explained with less of the FEAR And a bit more thorough explanation


it says nowhere that police must IGNORE domestic violence complaints,,

no photo
Thu 08/19/10 02:09 PM

In the six cases of domestic violence, Siddiqi said the judges ordered the husbands to take anger management classes and mentoring from community elders. There was no further punishment.

In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article4749183.ece

explained with less of the FEAR And a bit more thorough explanation

it says nowhere that police must IGNORE domestic violence complaints,,


And it doesn't say they have to ENFORCE the appropriate laws in cases of it, either ... Ever think those complaints may have been 'withdrawn' because of INTIMIDATION ... ? It's a favorite tactic ...

willing2's photo
Thu 08/19/10 02:24 PM
Got distracted. Jerry Springer is on.:wink: laugh

Insiders say Muslim spiritual leaders behind the controversial initiative are considering giving up on the former World Trade Center location


Great news if it's a done deal.

I am suspicious of (insiders say, and considering).

Those two phrases tell me, don't let up on the pressure until they are run out of town.

Why not consider doing upgrades in Mecca and take your comrades wit ya'!