Topic: Divorce Agreement | |
---|---|
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". THIS IS SO INCREDIBLY WELL PUT AND YOU CAN HARDLY BELIEVE IT'S BY A YOUNG PERSON, A STUDENT!!! WHATEVER HE RUNS FOR, VOTE FOR HIM. Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, et al: We have stuck together since the late 1950's for the sake of the kids, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right for us all, so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way. Here is a model separation agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes. We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military. We'll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and you can go with wind, solar and biodiesel. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell. You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them. We'll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street. You can have your beloved lifelong welfare dwellers, food stamps, homeless, homeboys, hippies, druggies and illegal aliens. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks. We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood . You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us. You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security. We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political correctness and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill. We'll keep the SUV's, pickup trucks and oversized luxury ars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find. You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors. We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We'll keep "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" and "The National Anthem." I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute "Imagine", "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing", "Kum Ba Ya" or "We Are the World". We'll practice trickle down economics and you can continue to give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our flag. Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like-minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll bet you answer which one of us will need whose help in 15 years. Sincerely, John J. Wall Law Student and an American P. S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Barbara Streisand, & Jane Fonda with you. P. S. S. And you won't have to press 1 for English when you call our country. |
|
|
|
This 'red meat screed' has been around for at least five years parading under a variety of different 'authorships' ... just propaganda ...
|
|
|
|
I wanted to put it in the joke section but figured it get moved..but it is a great idea..
|
|
|
|
It is, and I agree with a lot of the sentiments, but it's still fiction ... it's 'agitprop'.
|
|
|
|
What about someone like me who enjoys being a gun lover, and pot smoking, but detests hatred spread Christian churchs and doesn't believe in "surgical strike" warfare?
|
|
|
|
canada
![]() |
|
|
|
Most agree the repubes and demoncrats are woven from the same yarn.
They need dumped and replaced with the end the NAU program. Reestablish our sovereignty. |
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Mon 08/09/10 08:54 AM
|
|
What about someone like me who enjoys being a gun lover, and pot smoking, but detests hatred spread Christian churchs and doesn't believe in "surgical strike" warfare? Columbia!! |
|
|
|
What about someone like me who enjoys being a gun lover, and pot smoking, but detests hatred spread Christian churchs and doesn't believe in "surgical strike" warfare? anyone with weed gets pick. both sides like weed... |
|
|
|
What about someone like me who enjoys being a gun lover, and pot smoking, but detests hatred spread Christian churchs and doesn't believe in "surgical strike" warfare? Right. What ABOUT someone like you ... ? |
|
|
|
What about someone like me who enjoys being a gun lover, and pot smoking, but detests hatred spread Christian churchs and doesn't believe in "surgical strike" warfare? Columbia!! So I get the whole western hemisphere, gotcha!! |
|
|
|
Ever hear of 'surgery' without 'blood' ... ?
|
|
|
|
What about someone like me who enjoys being a gun lover, and pot smoking, but detests hatred spread Christian churchs and doesn't believe in "surgical strike" warfare? thats the problem with assumptions and labels isnt it? the piece is very clever, but not very realistic,, its like a father griping about child support and making a 'friendly' offer to just stay out of their kids life in return for not being fiscally held responsible,, |
|
|
|
What about someone like me who enjoys being a gun lover, and pot smoking, but detests hatred spread Christian churchs and doesn't believe in "surgical strike" warfare? thats the problem with assumptions and labels isnt it? the piece is very clever, but not very realistic,, its like a father griping about child support and making a 'friendly' offer to just stay out of their kids life in return for not being fiscally held responsible,, I'm afraid there will always be a handful that can't be pigeonholed into a label. Well, maybe "Inspect by 7." |
|
|
|
I'm afraid there will always be a handful that can't be pigeonholed into a label.
Much more than a handful – Those who like to label are extremists of the labeling kind – waaay over at the other extreme are the few who “begin” the other end and they just have all kinds of tolerance. Every spectrum has a middle ground; from this perspective it’s much easier to see all the way from one end of the spectrum to the other. This presents the middle grounder with a whole lot of knowledge and information from which to make their own decisions. While those at either end have a very limited or limiting view and so they tend to color their perspective with the view they are most familiar with. So we have name-callers, labelers, continuous pessimism, and a constant passion for their own opinions. And some (at the other end) who just sort of stay out of the mainstream and find sunshine and flowers in every day and pass on their extreme optimism even in the face of absolute certainty of a bad outcome. And in the middle are the rest of the fledglings trying to hold it all together. I’m TRYING to be optimistic that we just ‘happen’ to have an abundance of extremists on these forums – but lately I’m skeptical about that. Maybe the labeling extremists are simply very loud and persistant.... |
|
|