Topic: BHO into Kagan, Big Time
willing2's photo
Thu 08/05/10 06:01 AM
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e17_1280848849

Check out the Supreme Court web site and search the dockets for
"Obama - Kagan".... go to the docket and search
for Obama.

Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court....

She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.

All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard.

It's all about payback time for those that compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there.



msharmony's photo
Thu 08/05/10 08:41 AM
its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,

no photo
Thu 08/05/10 08:43 AM
Seriously ... how many brain cells does it take to recognize that Kagan is Obama's 'Mini-Me' ... ? Duh.

msharmony's photo
Thu 08/05/10 08:44 AM

Seriously ... how many brain cells does it take to recognize that Kagan is Obama's 'Mini-Me' ... ? Duh.



apparently just one or two extremely paranoid ones,,,

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 08:51 AM

its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,


it is odd the someone thats never been a judge gets to the supreme court judge. but she was dean of harvard law school.

msharmony's photo
Thu 08/05/10 09:00 AM


its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,


it is odd the someone thats never been a judge gets to the supreme court judge. but she was dean of harvard law school.


I always say the proof is in the pudding,
I said it about Palin but the pudding ended up kind of tart,,lol
I said it about Michael 'Brownie' Brown, and that pudding turned out kind of runny,,lol

lets see , with time, what taste Kagan leaves in our mouth,,,Im thinking she will be fine judging by her actions so far,,,

no photo
Thu 08/05/10 09:02 AM


Seriously ... how many brain cells does it take to recognize that Kagan is Obama's 'Mini-Me' ... ? Duh.



apparently just one or two extremely paranoid ones,,,


Wrong answer ... but at least it's consistent ...

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 09:03 AM



its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,


it is odd the someone thats never been a judge gets to the supreme court judge. but she was dean of harvard law school.


I always say the proof is in the pudding,
I said it about Palin but the pudding ended up kind of tart,,lol
I said it about Michael 'Brownie' Brown, and that pudding turned out kind of runny,,lol

lets see , with time, what taste Kagan leaves in our mouth,,,Im thinking she will be fine judging by her actions so far,,,

i don't have a problem with her. maybe obama wanted someone that has a "fresh, new outlook" on things.

msharmony's photo
Thu 08/05/10 09:04 AM




its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,


it is odd the someone thats never been a judge gets to the supreme court judge. but she was dean of harvard law school.


I always say the proof is in the pudding,
I said it about Palin but the pudding ended up kind of tart,,lol
I said it about Michael 'Brownie' Brown, and that pudding turned out kind of runny,,lol

lets see , with time, what taste Kagan leaves in our mouth,,,Im thinking she will be fine judging by her actions so far,,,

i don't have a problem with her. maybe obama wanted someone that has a "fresh, new outlook" on things.



it was kind of like that decision to add Ellen to American Idol,,just hope it works out better,,lol

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 09:16 AM





its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,


it is odd the someone thats never been a judge gets to the supreme court judge. but she was dean of harvard law school.


I always say the proof is in the pudding,
I said it about Palin but the pudding ended up kind of tart,,lol
I said it about Michael 'Brownie' Brown, and that pudding turned out kind of runny,,lol

lets see , with time, what taste Kagan leaves in our mouth,,,Im thinking she will be fine judging by her actions so far,,,

i don't have a problem with her. maybe obama wanted someone that has a "fresh, new outlook" on things.



it was kind of like that decision to add Ellen to American Idol,,just hope it works out better,,lol


ugh... i can't stand that show.

no photo
Thu 08/05/10 09:27 AM


its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,


it is odd the someone thats never been a judge gets to the supreme court judge. but she was dean of harvard law school.


Not particularly, as it's something like 40 out of the 111 Supreme Court Justices had no prior judicial experience.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 11:53 AM



its all about ignoring relevant history to create more propaganda and imply more conspiracy theories

way to completely overlook the HALF DOZEN or so other justices and courts who dismissed birther cases before Kagan even touched it or was the solicitor,,,


Berg v OBama filed august 2008 denied December 2008 in supreme court

Martin V Lingle filed october 2008 denied by circuit court of Hawaii

Donofrio v Wells reached supreme court december 2008 ,, declined

Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, filed october2008 at connecticut supreme court,, dismissed
appealed to US supreme court November 25 , december 15 2008


Kerchner v OBama filed January 2009, dismissed in new jersey district court

I guess its easier to believe all these courts and justices are compliant in some conspiracy and OBama chose to repay ONE of them with an appointment than it is to believe that the cases simply dont have the proper merit under the statutes of the law,,,


it is odd the someone thats never been a judge gets to the supreme court judge. but she was dean of harvard law school.


Not particularly, as it's something like 40 out of the 111 Supreme Court Justices had no prior judicial experience.


wow- i didn't know that...i thought it was something new.

no photo
Sat 08/07/10 08:15 AM
Nope, not new at all.