Topic: Say Bye-Bye, Dems ... | |
---|---|
They've finally realized we were SERIOUS about not wanting all that 'Hopey - McChangey' crap they decided to pass despite knowing that 68% of the American public didn't want it, and they're starting to crap their pants. Good. Let 'em. The logical consequence of 'falling on one's sword' for a 'cause' is always political death. This is only the FIRST in the two-part disassembly of the Communist Revolution that occurred in 2008 and activated in 2009 ... the next part comes in 2012. Be afraid, DemoComs - be VERY afraid ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2004646,00.html Dems Start to Panic as Reality of Midterm Woes Sets In By Mark Halperin Monday, Jul. 19, 2010 Under pressure, the Democrats are cracking. On both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, there is a realization that Nancy Pelosi's hold on the speakership is in true jeopardy; that losing control of the Senate is not out of the question; and that time, once the Democrats' best friend, is now their mortal enemy. Since January, when Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy's Massachusetts Senate seat, the President's party has tried to downplay in public what its pollsters have been saying in private: that Obama's alienation of independents and white voters, along with the enthusiasm gap between the right and the left, means that Republicans are on a trajectory to pick up massive numbers of House and Senate seats, perhaps even to regain control of Congress. Evidence of the pervasiveness of this view: Sunday's New York Times op-ed page, which featured a series of short essays from leading Democratic and Republican strategists about how Obama could go about staging a political comeback, focused not on November's midterms but on 2012 — an indication that Washington conventional wisdom has already written off prospects of Democrats sustaining a majority in the legislature. Even if the midterms end the Democrats' one-party rule, the President may well believe that his accomplishments during his first two years in office were worth it. But it's a sure bet that the vanquished House Democrats who lose their jobs and their gavels won't share that assessment. This is exactly what the cabal in the white house wants.. Not to mention all these ethics violations and trials and criminal charges past and coming up. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 08/01/10 03:03 AM
|
|
I think its what AMericans want,, or crave,, controversy at the risk of hypocrisy
its those terrible AMORAL democrats, although we had a season where it was AMORAL republicans inundating the airwaves with amoral allegations of improper conduct(usually sexual) its those sneaky backroom democrats, although we have republicans standing up for the 'freedom of expression' that should preclude disclosure in political campaigns of who is funding the ads(the same 'freedom' argument is rarely used by the same people when it comes to SNOOPING as deep as possible into OBamas birth records, or trying by all means to tie him in , in ANY way, with anyone else that is not in a favorable light,,,,nope, no problem demanding full disclosure in those cases) I get sick of the whole political and media circus to be honest and I dont care what party people align themselves with but I hope at some point we get ADULTS heading this country who do their job and work together as a team for the United States instead of working in subgroups against each other. IF they put half the effort and passion into building up our country as they do in tearing down the 'other party',,,,there is no limit to how incredible a nation we could become |
|
|