1 2 4 Next
Topic: It's PAYBACK, Cracker ...
Lpdon's photo
Sat 07/10/10 01:41 PM






Nope. I call the tea baggers, tea baggers because they referred to themselves as such.


None of the ones I know do. Besides you only say it to provoke people here because you know they find it extremly offensive.


Yeah, probably not anymore. By now, they've all gotten the memo re: it being a sexual term.


Sexual term?
It doesn't have to be a sexual term, right?


The way you quote it is.


No it isn't.

You read minds too?


To tea bag is a slang term for the act of a man placing his scrotum in the mouth of a sexual partner. The practice resembles dipping a tea bag into a cup of tea when it is done in a repeated in-and-out motion.

The activity has become more prominent in the media, and the term is used to describe the Tea Party movement as a form of ridicule.

According to columnist Dan Savage, the person's whose scrotum is being stimulated is known as "the teabagger" and "the teabaggee" is the one giving the stimulation: "A teabagger dips sack; a teabaggee receives dipped sack."

In 2009, the Tea Party movement formed to protest new U.S. tax and spend policies, referencing the Boston Tea Party for its name. The appellation "tea bagger" emerged, prompting puns by both commentators and protesters based on its sexual connotation. The president of the Media Research Center said that jokes made during CNN and MSNBC broadcasts were insulting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_(sexual_act)

BTW CNN and MSNBC is the ones who started it. Also the only meaning calling someone a Tea Bagger is for the sexual act.

msharmony's photo
Sat 07/10/10 01:44 PM







Nope. I call the tea baggers, tea baggers because they referred to themselves as such.


None of the ones I know do. Besides you only say it to provoke people here because you know they find it extremly offensive.


Yeah, probably not anymore. By now, they've all gotten the memo re: it being a sexual term.


Sexual term?
It doesn't have to be a sexual term, right?


The way you quote it is.


No it isn't.

You read minds too?


To tea bag is a slang term for the act of a man placing his scrotum in the mouth of a sexual partner. The practice resembles dipping a tea bag into a cup of tea when it is done in a repeated in-and-out motion.

The activity has become more prominent in the media, and the term is used to describe the Tea Party movement as a form of ridicule.

According to columnist Dan Savage, the person's whose scrotum is being stimulated is known as "the teabagger" and "the teabaggee" is the one giving the stimulation: "A teabagger dips sack; a teabaggee receives dipped sack."

In 2009, the Tea Party movement formed to protest new U.S. tax and spend policies, referencing the Boston Tea Party for its name. The appellation "tea bagger" emerged, prompting puns by both commentators and protesters based on its sexual connotation. The president of the Media Research Center said that jokes made during CNN and MSNBC broadcasts were insulting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_(sexual_act)

BTW CNN and MSNBC is the ones who started it. Also the only meaning calling someone a Tea Bagger is for the sexual act.



I never heard of the term(and I was an adult operator for a bit), but then I am not a guy. IN the english language though, it is my experience that

1) words often have multiple meanings AND
2) the definition of words are created and added based upon how the words are used

no photo
Sat 07/10/10 01:47 PM

the LAWS are not simple,, neither are the REQUIREMENTS for proving a case,,, from mainjustice.com and the statement of the assistant attorney general

' Although none of the defendants responded to the complaint, that did not absolve the Department of its legal and ethical obligations to ensure that any relief sought was consistent with the law and supported by the evidence. The entry of a default judgment is not automatic, and the Pennsylvania Bar Rules impart a clear duty of candor and honesty in any legal proceeding; those duties are only heightened in the type of ex parte hearing that occurred in this matter. See Pa. RPC 3.3(d). At the remedial stage, as with the liability stage, the Department remains obliged to ensure that the request for relief is supported by the evidence and the law.'

the default judgment still REQUIRED sufficient evidence and and consistency with the law in order for RELIEF to be sought,,,which was not found in this case to be met

read more at

http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/05/14/perez-testifies-at-new-black-panther-party-hearing/



Is 'ADJUDICATED' really such a difficult concept to grasp ... ? They were TRIED and FOUND GUILTY. HOLDER DISMISSED THE CHARGES. This is just volitional 'failure to comprehend'.

Lpdon's photo
Sat 07/10/10 01:49 PM








Nope. I call the tea baggers, tea baggers because they referred to themselves as such.


None of the ones I know do. Besides you only say it to provoke people here because you know they find it extremly offensive.


Yeah, probably not anymore. By now, they've all gotten the memo re: it being a sexual term.


Sexual term?
It doesn't have to be a sexual term, right?


The way you quote it is.


No it isn't.

You read minds too?


To tea bag is a slang term for the act of a man placing his scrotum in the mouth of a sexual partner. The practice resembles dipping a tea bag into a cup of tea when it is done in a repeated in-and-out motion.

The activity has become more prominent in the media, and the term is used to describe the Tea Party movement as a form of ridicule.

According to columnist Dan Savage, the person's whose scrotum is being stimulated is known as "the teabagger" and "the teabaggee" is the one giving the stimulation: "A teabagger dips sack; a teabaggee receives dipped sack."

In 2009, the Tea Party movement formed to protest new U.S. tax and spend policies, referencing the Boston Tea Party for its name. The appellation "tea bagger" emerged, prompting puns by both commentators and protesters based on its sexual connotation. The president of the Media Research Center said that jokes made during CNN and MSNBC broadcasts were insulting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_(sexual_act)

BTW CNN and MSNBC is the ones who started it. Also the only meaning calling someone a Tea Bagger is for the sexual act.



I never heard of the term(and I was an adult operator for a bit), but then I am not a guy. IN the english language though, it is my experience that

1) words often have multiple meanings AND
2) the definition of words are created and added based upon how the words are used


Often doesn't mean always.

heavenlyboy34's photo
Sat 07/10/10 01:50 PM

Why is it, that someone who is a mulatto (black and white parents) is automatically a black person?

Eric Holder is multiracial so why is he accepted as black? Same with Obama?

Why is Vin Diesel is not a black person, while his father was black?

What does it come down to to determine?


Good points, and I agree. But his most vocal supporters insist on calling him "black", even though the proper term is "mulatto". Rather strange, IMO.what

Dragoness's photo
Sat 07/10/10 01:52 PM
Black folks do not use the term mulatto.

That is a white terminology.

So does that make it more relevant?

Dragoness's photo
Sat 07/10/10 02:01 PM
Well tea baggers to me are a group of people who have several political agendas, some of people having racists agendas, most of the
issues have proven to be misinformation.
They are the misguided.

I see them as tea baggers because they wear tea bags in their hats and stuff. I don't care about their sexual activity at all.

Lpdon's photo
Sat 07/10/10 02:03 PM
Edited by Lpdon on Sat 07/10/10 02:11 PM

Well tea baggers to me are a group of people who have several political agendas, some of people having racists agendas, most of the
issues have proven to be misinformation.
They are the misguided.

I see them as tea baggers because they wear tea bags in their hats and stuff. I don't care about their sexual activity at all.


The proper term are Tea Partiests or Tea Party protesters. Tea Bagger is a sick and derogatory term and it's not about their sexual activity it's you relating to them as that sexual activity.


Dragoness's photo
Sat 07/10/10 02:05 PM
Edited by Dragoness on Sat 07/10/10 02:06 PM


Well tea baggers to me are a group of people who have several political agendas, some of people having racists agendas, most of the
issues have proven to be misinformation.
They are the misguided.

I see them as tea baggers because they wear tea bags in their hats and stuff. I don't care about their sexual activity at all.


The proper term are Tea Partiests or Te Party protesters. Tea Bagger is a sick and derogatory term and it's not about their sexual activity it's you relating to them as that sexual activity.




That is not what I said.

You keep saying that.

Which makes it your issue not mine.

Lpdon's photo
Sat 07/10/10 02:11 PM



Well tea baggers to me are a group of people who have several political agendas, some of people having racists agendas, most of the
issues have proven to be misinformation.
They are the misguided.

I see them as tea baggers because they wear tea bags in their hats and stuff. I don't care about their sexual activity at all.


The proper term are Tea Partiests or Te Party protesters. Tea Bagger is a sick and derogatory term and it's not about their sexual activity it's you relating to them as that sexual activity.




That is not what I said.

You keep saying that.

Which makes it your issue not mine.


It is my issue because you are being offensive.

msharmony's photo
Sat 07/10/10 04:24 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 07/10/10 04:40 PM


the LAWS are not simple,, neither are the REQUIREMENTS for proving a case,,, from mainjustice.com and the statement of the assistant attorney general

' Although none of the defendants responded to the complaint, that did not absolve the Department of its legal and ethical obligations to ensure that any relief sought was consistent with the law and supported by the evidence. The entry of a default judgment is not automatic, and the Pennsylvania Bar Rules impart a clear duty of candor and honesty in any legal proceeding; those duties are only heightened in the type of ex parte hearing that occurred in this matter. See Pa. RPC 3.3(d). At the remedial stage, as with the liability stage, the Department remains obliged to ensure that the request for relief is supported by the evidence and the law.'

the default judgment still REQUIRED sufficient evidence and and consistency with the law in order for RELIEF to be sought,,,which was not found in this case to be met

read more at

http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/05/14/perez-testifies-at-new-black-panther-party-hearing/



Is 'ADJUDICATED' really such a difficult concept to grasp ... ? They were TRIED and FOUND GUILTY. HOLDER DISMISSED THE CHARGES. This is just volitional 'failure to comprehend'.


where does it say found guilty? I indeed did miss that. What I read was that a DEFAULT judgment was granted and the above referenced explains the LIMITATIONS of such a judgment.


from washington times

'Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews. ' .....

'The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their superiors ordered them to reverse course, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.'

'A Justice Department spokesman on Thursday confirmed that the agency had dropped the case, dismissing two of the men from the lawsuit with no penalty and winning an order against the third man that simply prohibits him from bringing a weapon to a polling place in future elections.

The department was "successful in obtaining an injunction that prohibits the defendant who brandished a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling place from doing so again," spokesman Alejandro Miyar said. "Claims were dismissed against the other defendants based on a careful assessment of the facts and the law."






msharmony's photo
Sat 07/10/10 04:30 PM


Why is it, that someone who is a mulatto (black and white parents) is automatically a black person?

Eric Holder is multiracial so why is he accepted as black? Same with Obama?

Why is Vin Diesel is not a black person, while his father was black?

What does it come down to to determine?


Good points, and I agree. But his most vocal supporters insist on calling him "black", even though the proper term is "mulatto". Rather strange, IMO.what


it isnt really strange at all

mulatto can be anyone of white AND black ancestry

it doesnt NEGATE them from being black

we are permitted , in this country, to choose what we identify as and that is combined with how we are PERCEIVED to come up with some racial box for us to check,,,,

mulattos are BOTH Black and white

but some mulattos are PERCEIVED to be black and thus treated as such throughout their lives while others are PERCEIVED to be white and treated as such throughout their lives

I would imagine, someone looking like OBAma would be a member of the former...and since his dad is from Kenya, that also qualifies him as black because the races arent EXCLUSIVE(that is to say they dont require ancestry to be EXCLUSIVELY in one place)

1 2 4 Next