Topic: BP makes significant change | |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT!
|
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT! Yeah, sorry it might impact profits a bit. |
|
|
|
But wait! They just started a muli-million dollar ad campaign to boost their public image!
|
|
|
|
So, Jim...where's the picture? You know me...I only read pictures...like comics! Just kidding! |
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT! Yeah, sorry it might impact profits a bit. |
|
|
|
Edited by
JimNastics4u
on
Tue 06/08/10 11:07 AM
|
|
Hey guys. Nice to see you both.
Um... am I the only one who can see the picture of the gas pump that says "may contain 10% seawater" ??? How about now ? |
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT! What makes you think BP benefits by polluting? This is wasteful, and eats into their bottom line. They have all the incentive to care (and be sorry) because they stand to lose everything they risked. It's not normal for businesses not to care, so please enlighten me. |
|
|
|
Edited by
TheresMyFriend
on
Tue 06/08/10 11:07 AM
|
|
Hey guys. Nice to see you both. Um... am I the only one who can see the picture of the gas pump that says "may contain 10% seawater" ??? Hey Jim...can't speak for the others, but I haven't seen any picture whatsoever.... I was just courious, so I could get the humor. Additional: I went to the other site as well, and it ain't showing there either...just thought you'd want to know. |
|
|
|
Edited by
JimNastics4u
on
Tue 06/08/10 11:14 AM
|
|
Hey guys. Nice to see you both. Um... am I the only one who can see the picture of the gas pump that says "may contain 10% seawater" ??? Hey Jim...can't speak for the others, but I haven't seen any picture whatsoever.... I was just courious, so I could get the humor. Additional: I went to the other site as well, and it ain't showing there either...just thought you'd want to know. Thanks. I just made changes at all 4 sites where I posted it. Can you see my second attempt here (my comment above your last one) or there ? |
|
|
|
Edited by
TheresMyFriend
on
Tue 06/08/10 11:17 AM
|
|
Hey guys. Nice to see you both. Um... am I the only one who can see the picture of the gas pump that says "may contain 10% seawater" ??? Hey Jim...can't speak for the others, but I haven't seen any picture whatsoever.... I was just courious, so I could get the humor. Additional: I went to the other site as well, and it ain't showing there either...just thought you'd want to know. Thanks. I just made changes at all 4 sites where I posted it. Can you see my second attempt here (my comment above your last one) or there ? Yep...coming through like a champ now! additional: Not on the very first post at the very top...but good on the one further down.... |
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT! What makes you think BP benefits by polluting? This is wasteful, and eats into their bottom line. They have all the incentive to care (and be sorry) because they stand to lose everything they risked. It's not normal for businesses not to care, so please enlighten me. It's not that they WANT to pollute. However, certainly they are not only doing enough to HALT the pollution, but were not the least bit prepared for servicing this drilling. It seems they really don't care all that much about stopping it and are more interested in what they can capture from it, than halting it. |
|
|
|
Hey guys. Nice to see you both. Um... am I the only one who can see the picture of the gas pump that says "may contain 10% seawater" ??? How about now ? |
|
|
|
But wait! They just started a muli-million dollar ad campaign to boost their public image! Do People Care?? We DO. Exxon circa the Exxon Valdez disaster. |
|
|
|
BP's CEO just made a decent ad with a real sounding apology, a "no excuse" promise to clean everything and pay everyone who is damaged. He also stated that all the oil coming out of the well (for the moment) will be sold and the profits put into a Gulf Conservation Fund.
Slow learner. |
|
|
|
Edited by
franshade
on
Tue 06/08/10 05:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT! What makes you think BP benefits by polluting? This is wasteful, and eats into their bottom line. They have all the incentive to care (and be sorry) because they stand to lose everything they risked. It's not normal for businesses not to care, so please enlighten me. It's not that they WANT to pollute. However, certainly they are not only doing enough to HALT the pollution, but were not the least bit prepared for servicing this drilling. It seems they really don't care all that much about stopping it and are more interested in what they can capture from it, than halting it. What leads you to believe they are more interested in what they can capture than halting the spill? Do you have insider information that I'm not privy to? I don't see how you can say either way if you haven't talked to the decision-makers in person. |
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT! What makes you think BP benefits by polluting? This is wasteful, and eats into their bottom line. They have all the incentive to care (and be sorry) because they stand to lose everything they risked. It's not normal for businesses not to care, so please enlighten me. It's not that they WANT to pollute. However, certainly they are not only doing enough to HALT the pollution, but were not the least bit prepared for servicing this drilling. It seems they really don't care all that much about stopping it and are more interested in what they can capture from it, than halting it. What leads you to believe they are more interested in what they can capture than halting the spill? Do you have insider information that I'm not privy to? I don't see how you can say either way if you haven't talked to the decision-makers in person. Actions speak louder than words. |
|
|
|
Yeah! they pollute a lot more and they are SO SORRY FOR IT! What makes you think BP benefits by polluting? This is wasteful, and eats into their bottom line. They have all the incentive to care (and be sorry) because they stand to lose everything they risked. It's not normal for businesses not to care, so please enlighten me. It's not that they WANT to pollute. However, certainly they are not only doing enough to HALT the pollution, but were not the least bit prepared for servicing this drilling. It seems they really don't care all that much about stopping it and are more interested in what they can capture from it, than halting it. What leads you to believe they are more interested in what they can capture than halting the spill? Do you have insider information that I'm not privy to? I don't see how you can say either way if you haven't talked to the decision-makers in person. Actions speak louder than words. What actions? How do you know that they aren't too tied up in lawsuits and regulations to do more? How do you know what they've done or not done? I can't make a firm decision either way till I see all the evidence, and I don't see why you rush to do so. |
|
|
|
What actions? How do you know that they aren't too tied up in lawsuits and regulations to do more? How do you know what they've done or not done? I can't make a firm decision either way till I see all the evidence, and I don't see why you rush to do so. They have not acted to end the leak. There are no lawsuits nor regulations that would prevent them from capping the pipe. They did not build a rig that was serviceable. It should have never been allowed. Quit making excuses for the worst ecological disaster ever, which continues to this hour. |
|
|