2 Next
Topic: Two Things I Find Funny About Dems
Redykeulous's photo
Tue 06/01/10 12:11 PM
Edited by Redykeulous on Tue 06/01/10 12:14 PM


White Racists love the idea of denying welfare to those unwhites they feel are sucking the country dry, when in truth the majority of the welfare rolls are white.


Ya know, if this statement weren't actually KINDA close to true, it would be funny.

The thing is, while there are those in the Republican Party who think that way.

The vast majority, however, don't believe in giving welfare to those who do nothing to earn it no matter WHAT color their skin is.

As much as you might want to think otherwise, the Democrats are just as racist as any other party.

The Democrats, however, hide their racism behind a veil of " helping out " the poor when all their policies actually do is keep the poor people poor.


To see proof of that, one only needs to look as far as Detroit. Decades of Liberal " leadership ", corruption, and programs has put Detroit in the position it currently occupies.

One other thing...you say that the vast majority of people on the welfare rolls are white....

Care to provide the statistics proving that position?

I don't doubt it but I would like to see the numbers. I don't have time to search for them at the moment because I have to go to work.


Beware of any statistics which claim to provide accurate data on welfare recipients by race or gender.

There are dozens of welfare programs from the Federal level, through entitlements, through the State level through which most of the Fed entitlements funnel in combination with State funds.

Also, much of these funds are distributed to families with children in a household where the adult(s) work but together, as a family, they are below the ‘state’ criteria of poverty.

Many people with disabilities and retired people on fixed incomes, qualify for some type of state welfare although I would not consider them to be ON WELFARE as very often the need is a temporary condition and not a continuous one.

Two other things to consider:
As if it wasn’t already apparent – our blood lines are incredibly mixed – children of single heads of household are just as likely to be of mixed race as the parent is to be of one race. Accounting for race is impossible.

Welfare is often a last choice for people who choose instead to utilize charitable organizations, which in many cases offer a great deal more than state welfare, if for no other reason that fewer questions are asked with less judgment.

ALTERNATIVE: Look up government statistic on poverty but again beware, they often include unauthorized (undocumented, illegal) aliens.

A research project I completed about a year ago indicated that women (while exceeding men in education and recently providing the better of two incomes) also encompass the greatest number of those living in poverty as single head of household.

Seakolony's photo
Tue 06/01/10 12:20 PM
A research project I completed about a year ago indicated that women (while exceeding men in education and recently providing the better of two incomes) also encompass the greatest number of those living in poverty as single head of household.


And this would be me...........I make a decent check but try raising three kids with it and one off to college. One with Epilepsy and one with ADHD.....of course had to split them up to survive?? Concerns....how does it affect sibling be split due to finances....CS never enough to raise kids, but must be low enough for parental survival.......not the same as two checks coming into the home, add medical issues on toip of it and expenses of feeding and caring for an out of state child......extremely hard......but we should be able to survive......the 18th of June I become homeless....sad but true.....I am very ready to pick up my fishing pole and my hunting knife and set off into what is left of wild America. Sad but it feels more secure right now than anything else to me.

heavenlyboy34's photo
Tue 06/01/10 12:23 PM

It's even funnier having the Dems try to paint ANYONE else as a RAY!ciss' when THEY're the party [sic] with the ONLY serving Klansman (Robert Byrd, D-WV) in the Senate ... How far you think a 'pub would have gotten with that history ... ? Hypocrisy is their middle name ... It was also the 'craps who instituted the 'Jim Crow' laws and fought integration and 'civil rights' ... so much for having the truth on their side ...


I see enough hypocrisy and lies on all sides to dismiss them as worthless. laugh shades

no photo
Tue 06/01/10 12:28 PM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Tue 06/01/10 12:29 PM


It's even funnier having the Dems try to paint ANYONE else as a RAY!ciss' when THEY're the party [sic] with the ONLY serving Klansman (Robert Byrd, D-WV) in the Senate ... How far you think a 'pub would have gotten with that history ... ? Hypocrisy is their middle name ... It was also the 'craps who instituted the 'Jim Crow' laws and fought integration and 'civil rights' ... so much for having the truth on their side ...


I see enough hypocrisy and lies on all sides to dismiss them as worthless. laugh shades


True - they ARE all worthless, but to re-word Orwell's phrase, "Some animals are more worthless than others" ... I still have to give the 'pubs the edge in marginal credibility ...

Seakolony's photo
Tue 06/01/10 12:41 PM
Edited by Seakolony on Tue 06/01/10 12:42 PM
I found something funny about Democrats...........they are all fat balding guys or ugly old women............oops sorry thought I had one, but that would be Republicans, too, DAM can not find anything on this one that is actually funny. I do try very hard to see the opposition. I really do!!!

no photo
Tue 06/01/10 01:06 PM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Tue 06/01/10 01:07 PM

I found something funny about Democrats...........they are all fat balding guys or ugly old women............oops sorry thought I had one, but that would be Republicans, too, DAM can not find anything on this one that is actually funny. I do try very hard to see the opposition. I really do!!!


Well, you were REAL close, 'cuz the Dems DO have the ugliest broads around ... somethin' about bein' so sour 'n negative all the time finally catches up to 'em by the time they're in their late twenties ...

Lpdon's photo
Tue 06/01/10 03:39 PM


I found something funny about Democrats...........they are all fat balding guys or ugly old women............oops sorry thought I had one, but that would be Republicans, too, DAM can not find anything on this one that is actually funny. I do try very hard to see the opposition. I really do!!!


Well, you were REAL close, 'cuz the Dems DO have the ugliest broads around ... somethin' about bein' so sour 'n negative all the time finally catches up to 'em by the time they're in their late twenties ...


Can you say Hillary Clinton and Janet Reno? laugh

msharmony's photo
Tue 06/01/10 03:59 PM


Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function: noun
Date: 1933
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination


so, racism is a specific type of bigotry founded in RACE,, as opposed to nationality or ethnicity,,,

and to assign that bigotry to any political group specifically is illogical and dishonest


So your argument is that it's impossible for a political 'party' [sic] to adopt an ethnocentric policy position about race ... ? The facts don't support that. The 'craps used it pretty well to their 'advantage' against the 'civil rights' movement in the '50s and '60s. Which 'party' do you think Orval Faubus, George Wallace, Lester Maddox, et al (including that cute li'l Robert Byrd) happened to belong to ... ? They sure weren't Republicans. It was the 'craps who fought all of the things that were brought about by the 'progressives' back then (yes, 'civil rights' was a 'progressive' concept), and it was the 'craps who fought to keep the 'slave mentality' alive - which comes 'round to the point that it IS indeed possible for a political party to adopt and use the concepts and tenets of 'racism' to its own ends. You haven't forgotten the racism Hitler employed against the Jews and other 'üntermenschen', have you ... ? Sorry, but 'dissociation' from reality ain't gonna be a-workin' here ...



neither will the usual attempt to use false paraphrasing to prove some agenda...

my statement was 'to assign that bigotry to any political group specifically is illogical and dishonest'

...notice the word specifically and notice the definition of specific in this context,,

2 a : restricted to a particular individual, situation, relation, or effect

racism is not restricted to any party or any group of people, it is a PERSONAL perception that some will agree with and some will not,,,in ANY group

heavenlyboy34's photo
Tue 06/01/10 04:03 PM
Edited by heavenlyboy34 on Tue 06/01/10 04:05 PM
edit: n/m

Lpdon's photo
Tue 06/01/10 10:55 PM



Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function: noun
Date: 1933
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination


so, racism is a specific type of bigotry founded in RACE,, as opposed to nationality or ethnicity,,,

and to assign that bigotry to any political group specifically is illogical and dishonest


So your argument is that it's impossible for a political 'party' [sic] to adopt an ethnocentric policy position about race ... ? The facts don't support that. The 'craps used it pretty well to their 'advantage' against the 'civil rights' movement in the '50s and '60s. Which 'party' do you think Orval Faubus, George Wallace, Lester Maddox, et al (including that cute li'l Robert Byrd) happened to belong to ... ? They sure weren't Republicans. It was the 'craps who fought all of the things that were brought about by the 'progressives' back then (yes, 'civil rights' was a 'progressive' concept), and it was the 'craps who fought to keep the 'slave mentality' alive - which comes 'round to the point that it IS indeed possible for a political party to adopt and use the concepts and tenets of 'racism' to its own ends. You haven't forgotten the racism Hitler employed against the Jews and other 'üntermenschen', have you ... ? Sorry, but 'dissociation' from reality ain't gonna be a-workin' here ...



neither will the usual attempt to use false paraphrasing to prove some agenda...

my statement was 'to assign that bigotry to any political group specifically is illogical and dishonest'

...notice the word specifically and notice the definition of specific in this context,,

2 a : restricted to a particular individual, situation, relation, or effect

racism is not restricted to any party or any group of people, it is a PERSONAL perception that some will agree with and some will not,,,in ANY group


Not saying it's restricted, just the Dem's have a proven history of it.

msharmony's photo
Tue 06/01/10 11:27 PM




Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function: noun
Date: 1933
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination


so, racism is a specific type of bigotry founded in RACE,, as opposed to nationality or ethnicity,,,

and to assign that bigotry to any political group specifically is illogical and dishonest


So your argument is that it's impossible for a political 'party' [sic] to adopt an ethnocentric policy position about race ... ? The facts don't support that. The 'craps used it pretty well to their 'advantage' against the 'civil rights' movement in the '50s and '60s. Which 'party' do you think Orval Faubus, George Wallace, Lester Maddox, et al (including that cute li'l Robert Byrd) happened to belong to ... ? They sure weren't Republicans. It was the 'craps who fought all of the things that were brought about by the 'progressives' back then (yes, 'civil rights' was a 'progressive' concept), and it was the 'craps who fought to keep the 'slave mentality' alive - which comes 'round to the point that it IS indeed possible for a political party to adopt and use the concepts and tenets of 'racism' to its own ends. You haven't forgotten the racism Hitler employed against the Jews and other 'üntermenschen', have you ... ? Sorry, but 'dissociation' from reality ain't gonna be a-workin' here ...



neither will the usual attempt to use false paraphrasing to prove some agenda...

my statement was 'to assign that bigotry to any political group specifically is illogical and dishonest'

...notice the word specifically and notice the definition of specific in this context,,

2 a : restricted to a particular individual, situation, relation, or effect

racism is not restricted to any party or any group of people, it is a PERSONAL perception that some will agree with and some will not,,,in ANY group


Not saying it's restricted, just the Dem's have a proven history of it.


whats proven is some dems have been racist and so have some republicans

2 Next