Wow. The Usurper-In-Chief has trouble with his Selective Service System ('SSS') and Social Security registration number now ... the number sequence says he lived in CONNECTICUT, since it begins with the prefix of 042, correct for Connecticut. Suddenly, tho', people are having trouble accessing the SSS database to research this number ... Coincidence? You decide.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=156573

BORN IN THE USA?

U.S. Selective Service in Obama cover-up?

Mysterious Social Security Number now wreaks havoc in online search

Posted: May 23, 2010 | 4:37 pm Eastern
By Joe Kovacs | © 2010 WorldNetDaily

Is the U.S. Selective Service System now blocking access to President Barack Obama's online registration records?

Members of the public searching the federal database for the commander in chief's registration are suddenly finding new difficulty, possibly due to the startling revelation of Obama's alleged use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number.

The Selective Service System, or SSS, collects names of Americans for use by the Department of Defense in the event of a national emergency. On its website, it says it provides the nation "with a structure and a system of guidelines which will provide the most prompt, efficient, and equitable draft possible, if the country should need it."

Regarding President Obama, "He is registered. There is no doubt in our minds that he has, and we're quite prepared to say so," SSS public-affairs specialist Dan Amon told WND.

But the agency's online search engine now appears to be precluding the public from seeing Obama's record after allowing unfettered access.

The database allows people to search for registrants as long as a correct name, Social Security Number and date of birth are entered.

On May 5, WND entered the criteria for President Obama, using his date of birth as Aug. 4, 1961, and his Social Security Number, which begins with the Connecticut-issued prefix of 042.

The Selective Service database instantly issued a "matched record" without a problem that day, indicating Obama's Selective Service Number is 61-1125539-1. It lists date of registration as Sept. 4, 1980.

However, when WND re-entered the same information on May 20, the database did not provide the matched record, but instead posted a message, stating, "Error. Sorry, your request cannot be processed at this time because you have exceeded the daily limit for the verification of these credentials."

The problems using the SSS search engine come in the wake of WND's disclosure that two private investigators working independently are wondering why Obama is using a Social Security Number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

The stunning revelation apparently prompted Internet giant Google to clamp down specifically on WND's report and warn that some sites carrying information on the situation "may harm your computer."

The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.

"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."

The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.

You can have all the money in the world and the most powerful on your side, but eventually a cover up will be found out.

In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.


hmmm,, so how did they INVESTIGATE his first job,, without having a Social security number


is the claim he was working without a social security number? seems baskin robbins should be investigated then,,,,



interesting too that private investigators (only two) might have access to the PRESIDENTS social security number and be able to INVESTIGATE information relating to it,,,



the REST of the information regarding how social security numbers are assigned can be found at http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html

The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.


In other words, those AREA numbers are not proof of where one lived OR where they were born just where the application was submitted


but , the worst that will come of it, is they will PROVE he lived in connecticut at some time or that someone applied for his card somewhere in connecticut ,,,,when he was 14...lol or he worked without a social security number


,,,I think the statute will have run out to do anything about it though..

So. How DOES one wind up with that '042' coding when one has never LIVED there ... ? This is NOT a question for US to answer - this is a question (like the ORIGINAL long-form 'vault' copy of his birth certificate) for HIM to answer. While he's at it, he can answer all those OTHER questions about things like his educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers ... you know, the stuff that EVERY OTHER PRESIDENT has HAD to make PUBLIC.

He has a Federal job using that SSN.

Statute runs out?!?!

To apply for an SSN, he'd have had to do it in person. No one else has his signature.

Sure! He took a couple days off, ran up to Conneticut, applied for an SSN and got back in time for his next shift at da ice-cream shop. I can see how all libs could actually buy that story!
Dem straws are up there somewhere. Keep graspin' for 'em!!

oh,, if you repeat it enough,,,,lol

its not a mandate that presidents make those records public


and , unless reading comprehension is an issue, he does not have to answer whent he social security site ANSWERS FOR YOU

The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.


,,,notice,, the LAST SENTENCE

so wrong,, my daughter, at three, has a social security number AND a social security card,, did SHE have to sign for it?


AN adult has to apply for a social security card(or number), if a CHILD has a number, an ADULT had to apply for it

A sole accusation from a private investigator...does not a national case make,,,unless one commonly enjoys the tabloids


I dont know libs from conservatives, but I will tell you the fishing expedition gets more and more ridiculous.....and common sense is becoming less common

http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10023.html

I estimate this one will take less than a month to be exposed as another ridiculous , foundationless, birther conspiracy theory/lie

You will defend the Messiah no matter what wont you? The guy could commit cold blooded murder or rape and he would still be idolized.

This is what happens when people vote in a guy because they want to see a black President. I know many people who voted for him because of his race, now that is true racism.

It's all good!
Hussein made a "Historic" memory with Hawaii. After years of pure dempcrats, they threw Hussein under th' bus.

lol, so condescending,, but I would expect no less. I guess being black was the only reason I voted for OBama, just like so many people ONLY voted Mccain because he was white. Oh, and all those people POLLED who ADMITTED they couldnt vote for a black president. Guess if they had had their candidate , their attitude would have been excused,,,?

sorry dear, but I at least TRY to use logic and gather information before coming to my decisions

My messiah is not any man, and NO I dont defend OBama on everything I have posted in these very threads several issues upon which I disagree with him(unlike the unconditional worshiping you do for your employer who you would NEVER speak ill of,,, remember)

As to idolizing him, I have no idols either. I do admire him for many reasons though. This is a case of little to NO evidence. A case where someone just posted some accusations on a website, and then those people just ACHING to crucify this president jumping on board the band wagon. Sorry, but I need alot more evidence than the mailing address on an application for a ss card or someones refusal to provide me SECONDARY evidence of their place of birth(after already providing primary evidence) to see a conspiracy.