Topic: Y do guys like small chicks? | |
---|---|
This is BS...Men Like women with Curves!! I got thicker after having my son which I finally 5 years got that pre baby bod back and the funny thing is I got more play when I was thicker....Go Figure! Men like women no matter what the size. I have been on both sides of the size spectrum as a size 14 with 36d and had no problem getting action. I am now on the smaller side being a size 0-2 with 34b. I get the same amount of action. I think it all depends on what it is that you are in search of and how you carry yourself to get or not. |
|
|
|
Im a size 12, 5 10, long brown hair and a fat *** and wear a 44C bra. I love to cook and clean. I like sports, action movies, smoking and drinking. I play video games and spades. So y cant i find a good, well-endowed, truthful/honest man who likes kids? My 2 cents: I'm sure there are plenty of guys out there that would like you just the way you are. But it will be somewhat harder to find one that can handle the 4 kids that come along with you. JMO i am going to have to agree. you are beautiful but the instant big family doesnt sound so good... |
|
|
|
cuz small chicks rule!
|
|
|
|
Thick or Thin, curves yes !!!
Its actually has more to do with the woman's personality. |
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking.
|
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean |
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean As a general rule, I would say he is correct about the better shape part. If a woman is thin, she will have less chance of having the health problems that go along with being overweight. (guys too) But the better looking part is pretty subjective. |
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean As a general rule, I would say he is correct about the better shape part. If a woman is thin, she will have less chance of having the health problems that go along with being overweight. (guys too) But the better looking part is pretty subjective. I can take it to another extreme, skinny = malnourished thin does not mean healthy |
|
|
|
Edited by
LewisW123
on
Wed 03/03/10 11:07 AM
|
|
Nah, I changed my mind.
People hate a wise-*** |
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean As a general rule, I would say he is correct about the better shape part. If a woman is thin, she will have less chance of having the health problems that go along with being overweight. (guys too) But the better looking part is pretty subjective. I can take it to another extreme, skinny = malnourished thin does not mean healthy Generally thin does mean healthier than fat...unless you are talking about people with diseases anorexia or bulimia but if you take two people without diseases one thin(not crack thin) and one heavier the thinner one is going to be healthier. |
|
|
|
I'm chunky right now...I KNOW I am not as healthy as I could be...if I was in better shape, I would be healthier. It's a reality. Some people face it, some people don't want to.
|
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean As a general rule, I would say he is correct about the better shape part. If a woman is thin, she will have less chance of having the health problems that go along with being overweight. (guys too) But the better looking part is pretty subjective. I can take it to another extreme, skinny = malnourished thin does not mean healthy Generally thin does mean healthier than fat...unless you are talking about people with diseases anorexia or bulimia but if you take two people without diseases one thin(not crack thin) and one heavier the thinner one is going to be healthier. still disagree, take 2 random thin people, 2 random regular people, 2 random thick people, 2 random fat/obese people. I'd still think that the regular sized would be healthier than the thin, and the thick would be healthier than the fat/obese. But what do I know, this is just my opinion |
|
|
|
I hear a lot of fat women say that. LOL All things being equal, thin is always healthier. As far as the "malnourished" comment goes, no one is talking about going to the extremes, just someone who is not over weight. |
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean As a general rule, I would say he is correct about the better shape part. If a woman is thin, she will have less chance of having the health problems that go along with being overweight. (guys too) But the better looking part is pretty subjective. I can take it to another extreme, skinny = malnourished thin does not mean healthy Generally thin does mean healthier than fat...unless you are talking about people with diseases anorexia or bulimia but if you take two people without diseases one thin(not crack thin) and one heavier the thinner one is going to be healthier. O.K., I'm still with Isaac. Healthier generally means you will live longer. In my work, I see a lot of people in their 80's and 90's that are healthy, living on their own, independently. NONE of them are fat. |
|
|
|
Edited by
isaac_dede
on
Wed 03/03/10 11:27 AM
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean As a general rule, I would say he is correct about the better shape part. If a woman is thin, she will have less chance of having the health problems that go along with being overweight. (guys too) But the better looking part is pretty subjective. I can take it to another extreme, skinny = malnourished thin does not mean healthy Generally thin does mean healthier than fat...unless you are talking about people with diseases anorexia or bulimia but if you take two people without diseases one thin(not crack thin) and one heavier the thinner one is going to be healthier. still disagree, take 2 random thin people, 2 random regular people, 2 random thick people, 2 random fat/obese people. I'd still think that the regular sized would be healthier than the thin, and the thick would be healthier than the fat/obese. But what do I know, this is just my opinion That depends on your definition of regular....if someone has a waist size of 27/28 are they thin or regular? what if their waist size is 36/38 is that regular? |
|
|
|
I'm chunky right now...I KNOW I am not as healthy as I could be...if I was in better shape, I would be healthier. It's a reality. Some people face it, some people don't want to. I face my reality and yours too. Just stating my opinion, know plenty of rail-thin people who most people would associate with health, yet I know better. But to each their own, feel free to agree to disagree, makes it more interesting |
|
|
|
I hear a lot of fat women say that. LOL All things being equal, thin is always healthier. As far as the "malnourished" comment goes, no one is talking about going to the extremes, just someone who is not over weight. if ever all things were equal - thin and thick would be healthy |
|
|
|
That depends on your definition of regular....if someone has a waist size of 27/28 are they thin or regular? what if their waist size is 36/38 is that regular? VERY good point! I can't begin to tell you how many womens profiles list their size as 'normal' when they are way over-weight. When you ask them why they call themselves normal, they say that everyone in the country is overweight.... so that's normal |
|
|
|
because generally they are in better shape, and our better looking. ouch, untrue and mean As a general rule, I would say he is correct about the better shape part. If a woman is thin, she will have less chance of having the health problems that go along with being overweight. (guys too) But the better looking part is pretty subjective. I can take it to another extreme, skinny = malnourished thin does not mean healthy Generally thin does mean healthier than fat...unless you are talking about people with diseases anorexia or bulimia but if you take two people without diseases one thin(not crack thin) and one heavier the thinner one is going to be healthier. still disagree, take 2 random thin people, 2 random regular people, 2 random thick people, 2 random fat/obese people. I'd still think that the regular sized would be healthier than the thin, and the thick would be healthier than the fat/obese. But what do I know, this is just my opinion That depends on your definition of regular....if someone has a waist size of 27/28 are they thin or regular? what if their waist size is 36/38 is that regular? Are they 5 ft tall, 6 ft tall, or 7 ft tall? That's my point everything is subjective and depends on more data than supplied. And by whose standards are they being judged on? Would this same information be the same for a naturally thin person vs an athlete? |
|
|
|
That depends on your definition of regular....if someone has a waist size of 27/28 are they thin or regular? what if their waist size is 36/38 is that regular? VERY good point! I can't begin to tell you how many womens profiles list their size as 'normal' when they are way over-weight. When you ask them why they call themselves normal, they say that everyone in the country is overweight.... so that's normal same goes for the men online - asked their heights most reply they are 5ft 9in and/or taller. yet when one meets they are barely 5'4-7" tall. |
|
|