Topic: Racism: Justice Dept v the Voters of Kinston, NC | |
---|---|
Actually there is no racism involved. Wanting the identity of the incumbants to be identified as what party they are associated with is just that an identity of the party.
Of course the Democratic party wants it's incumbants to be identified that way because there are voters who vote Democrat across the board. I have family members who do this just to make life easier for themselves. If a D is by the name they vote that one. And we are mostly white folks. |
|
|
|
So the Justice Department has essentially concluded that Black voters in a North Carolina town aren't smart enough to be able to identify which candidate is their "candidate of choice" without the aid of a parenthetical D or R next to the candidates name. This, despite the overwhelming majority of voters in an election with the highest turnout in recent memory. The conclusion can only be that the Justice Departement doesn't value the democratic process and that the white voters of this city will only vote for a black candidate if they know he's a Democrat.. wow.. just wow.. absurd. all races of democrats and republicans are affected by the statute. if obama brought race to the table as an issue, you bit the hook as he'd hoped you would. brings the issue to the forefront you see. it's only about race if you don't let it die. You don't get it, I guess.. The voter decided overwhelmingly to eliminate party affiliation in local races.. It was the Justice Dept that stepped in and decided to overrule the will of the voters and inject race into the issue, not me or the media, by asserting that whites would only vote for a black candidate if they belonged to the Democrat party.. So in order to protect the election and re-election of Democrat candidates, the Justice Department stepped in.. plain and simple. ************************************ Actually there is no racism involved. Wanting the identity of the incumbants to be identified as what party they are associated with is just that an identity of the party.
Of course the Democratic party wants it's incumbants to be identified that way because there are voters who vote Democrat across the board. I have family members who do this just to make life easier for themselves. If a D is by the name they vote that one. And we are mostly white folks. So not only are you admitting that politics are involved in decisions coming out of the Justice Department, but you are asserting that "down the board" voters need to be protected from their own laziness and political ignorance.. Down-the-board voting is part of the problem, on either side.. People should elect candidates based on the issues and not strictly on what party they belong to.. I thought Obama was going to usher in a new era of "post-partisan politics".. I guess it's only post partisan if you goose step to the Demoncrat party drums.. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Anonimoose
on
Thu 10/22/09 11:55 AM
|
|
Actually there is no racism involved. Wanting the identity of the incumbants to be identified as what party they are associated with is just that an identity of the party. Of course the Democratic party wants it's incumbants to be identified that way because there are voters who vote Democrat across the board. I have family members who do this just to make life easier for themselves. If a D is by the name they vote that one. And we are mostly white folks. So not only are you admitting that politics are involved in decisions coming out of the Justice Department, but you are asserting that "down the board" voters need to be protected from their own laziness and political ignorance.. Down-the-board voting is part of the problem, on either side.. People should elect candidates based on the issues and not strictly on what party they belong to.. I thought Obama was going to usher in a new era of "post-partisan politics".. I guess it's only post partisan if you goose step to the Demoncrat party drums.. Exactly. Straight-ticket voting is, as you pointed out, the lazy and ignorant person's way to exercise their suffrage. |
|
|
|
Actually there is no racism involved. Wanting the identity of the incumbants to be identified as what party they are associated with is just that an identity of the party. Of course the Democratic party wants it's incumbants to be identified that way because there are voters who vote Democrat across the board. I have family members who do this just to make life easier for themselves. If a D is by the name they vote that one. And we are mostly white folks. Well, then your family members examples of the ones that the Justice Department is talking about.. You'd vote for Satan if he had a (D) next to his name and not only would you never know it, you'd probably feel good about it because you "voted Democrat" |
|
|
|
And you're right, Moose.. Straight ticket voting is a real issue as evidenced by the respondent above.
|
|
|
|
You don't get it, I guess.. The voter decided overwhelmingly to eliminate party affiliation in local races.. It was the Justice Dept that stepped in and decided to overrule the will of the voters and inject race into the issue, not me or the media, by asserting that whites would only vote for a black candidate if they belonged to the Democrat party.. So in order to protect the election and re-election of Democrat candidates, the Justice Department stepped in.. plain and simple. fine. then post the portion of the justice department's written position that asserts "that whites would only vote for black candidates if they belonged to the democratic party". if the justice department injected race into the issue then it will be in their ruling. |
|
|
|
So not only are you admitting that politics are involved in decisions coming out of the Justice Department, but you are asserting that "down the board" voters need to be protected from their own laziness and political ignorance.. actually the founders made that decision when they wrote the electoral college into article two of the constitution. |
|
|
|
This juryrigging the vote stuff is a scam, and not even a new one.That is why the Justice department stepped in and shut it down
|
|
|