Topic: David Lettermans' Shame
adj4u's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:08 AM
karma rules

prisoner's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:10 AM

AWWW POOR DAVEEE He screwed around, and hurt people,without the slightest amount of consideration, and now hes getting it in return.



WAAAAA POOR FREAKIN DAVEEE!!
frustrated Once again,it's all about the law. If the sex was consentual,Dave did nothing wrong. Extortion is a crime. Sex between 2 consenting adults is not. If Dave was screwing the guys' girlfriend and she agreed,Dave did nothing wrong. You can't extort from someone if they are screwing your girlfriend. be seeing you

KevRoku's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:21 AM


AWWW POOR DAVEEE He screwed around, and hurt people,without the slightest amount of consideration, and now hes getting it in return.



WAAAAA POOR FREAKIN DAVEEE!!
frustrated Once again,it's all about the law. If the sex was consentual,Dave did nothing wrong. Extortion is a crime. Sex between 2 consenting adults is not. If Dave was screwing the guys' girlfriend and she agreed,Dave did nothing wrong. You can't extort from someone if they are screwing your girlfriend. be seeing you


Umm..what Dave did was a crime dude...yes sex between two consenting adults isn't..but when one adult is married..that is called Adultery..and that can result in..bum bum bum..the wife getting everything in the divorce.. rofl

adj4u's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:22 AM


AWWW POOR DAVEEE He screwed around, and hurt people,without the slightest amount of consideration, and now hes getting it in return.



WAAAAA POOR FREAKIN DAVEEE!!
frustrated Once again,it's all about the law. If the sex was consentual,Dave did nothing wrong. Extortion is a crime. Sex between 2 consenting adults is not. If Dave was screwing the guys' girlfriend and she agreed,Dave did nothing wrong. You can't extort from someone if they are screwing your girlfriend. be seeing you


well are you saying it is ok to give your word then ignore it


if ones word is worthless

then what are they actually worth

it may not be agaist the law (which may not be the case he was in a contract with his wife and he broke that contract so a contractal law was probably broken)

and if she divorses him the fact he broke that contract will be major in the on going cost of his actions

not to mention the possibility that those that worked for him may have felt their job was in danger if they did not "perform" there are many aspects behind the forefront of this situation

and this was a kiss put down thread in the beginning but as the opening poster posted on the off topic remarks i guess it is still on point


:wink: laugh laugh laugh laugh


but hey what do i know


prisoner's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:29 AM



AWWW POOR DAVEEE He screwed around, and hurt people,without the slightest amount of consideration, and now hes getting it in return.



WAAAAA POOR FREAKIN DAVEEE!!
frustrated Once again,it's all about the law. If the sex was consentual,Dave did nothing wrong. Extortion is a crime. Sex between 2 consenting adults is not. If Dave was screwing the guys' girlfriend and she agreed,Dave did nothing wrong. You can't extort from someone if they are screwing your girlfriend. be seeing you


Umm..what Dave did was a crime dude...yes sex between two consenting adults isn't..but when one adult is married..that is called Adultery..and that can result in..bum bum bum..the wife getting everything in the divorce.. rofl
frustrated Adultery is not a crime. It can benefit one side in divorce court,but it is not a criminal act. be seeing you

KevRoku's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:32 AM
Yeah it's not a criminal act..even though you can be locked up in some occasions..jail time does not mean a crime..you got me..

adj4u's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:34 AM
March 21, 2008, 1:51 pm
Is Adultery a Crime in New York?
By Sewell Chan


Section 255.17 of the state penal law states, “A person is guilty of adultery when he engages in sexual intercourse with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse. Adultery is a class B misdemeanor.” A class B misdemeanor is punishable by up to 90 days in jail or a $500 fine.


http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/is-adultery-a-crime-in-new-york/


so yes it is a crime

KevRoku's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:36 AM
Edited by KevRoku on Wed 10/07/09 09:38 AM

March 21, 2008, 1:51 pm
Is Adultery a Crime in New York?
By Sewell Chan


Section 255.17 of the state penal law states, “A person is guilty of adultery when he engages in sexual intercourse with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse. Adultery is a class B misdemeanor.” A class B misdemeanor is punishable by up to 90 days in jail or a $500 fine.


http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/is-adultery-a-crime-in-new-york/


so yes it is a crime


:thumbsup: rofl. be seeing you

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:40 AM



AWWW POOR DAVEEE He screwed around, and hurt people,without the slightest amount of consideration, and now hes getting it in return.



WAAAAA POOR FREAKIN DAVEEE!!
frustrated Once again,it's all about the law. If the sex was consentual,Dave did nothing wrong. Extortion is a crime. Sex between 2 consenting adults is not. If Dave was screwing the guys' girlfriend and she agreed,Dave did nothing wrong. You can't extort from someone if they are screwing your girlfriend. be seeing you


well are you saying it is ok to give your word then ignore it


if ones word is worthless

then what are they actually worth

it may not be agaist the law (which may not be the case he was in a contract with his wife and he broke that contract so a contractal law was probably broken)

and if she divorses him the fact he broke that contract will be major in the on going cost of his actions

not to mention the possibility that those that worked for him may have felt their job was in danger if they did not "perform" there are many aspects behind the forefront of this situation

and this was a kiss put down thread in the beginning but as the opening poster posted on the off topic remarks i guess it is still on point


:wink: laugh laugh laugh laugh


but hey what do i know




Shouldn't it be between him and his wife if he cheated? Not him, the rest of the world and his wife.

GRIFFIN_LIZZARD's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:42 AM
I believe it was said that it was Before he was married.. was it not?

KevRoku's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:42 AM




AWWW POOR DAVEEE He screwed around, and hurt people,without the slightest amount of consideration, and now hes getting it in return.



WAAAAA POOR FREAKIN DAVEEE!!
frustrated Once again,it's all about the law. If the sex was consentual,Dave did nothing wrong. Extortion is a crime. Sex between 2 consenting adults is not. If Dave was screwing the guys' girlfriend and she agreed,Dave did nothing wrong. You can't extort from someone if they are screwing your girlfriend. be seeing you


well are you saying it is ok to give your word then ignore it


if ones word is worthless

then what are they actually worth

it may not be agaist the law (which may not be the case he was in a contract with his wife and he broke that contract so a contractal law was probably broken)

and if she divorses him the fact he broke that contract will be major in the on going cost of his actions

not to mention the possibility that those that worked for him may have felt their job was in danger if they did not "perform" there are many aspects behind the forefront of this situation

and this was a kiss put down thread in the beginning but as the opening poster posted on the off topic remarks i guess it is still on point


:wink: laugh laugh laugh laugh


but hey what do i know




Shouldn't it be between him and his wife if he cheated? Not him, the rest of the world and his wife.


Yes..and I agree with your point there..people should be out of his business..was just trying to prove it was against the law as the post creator seemed to think cheating on your wife wasn't against the law.

prisoner's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:42 AM
indifferent I guess just about everybody should be locked up. be seeing you

KevRoku's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:44 AM

I believe it was said that it was Before he was married.. was it not?


not 100% sure..never really read into what actually happened..just remember reading in the paper back stage he had like..a sex pad set up it said lol..was weird..so I think he's probably been active in it for god knows how long..

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:44 AM


Yes..and I agree with your point there..people should be out of his business..was just trying to prove it was against the law as the post creator seemed to think cheating on your wife wasn't against the law.


Does it really matter? I just do not think David Letterman's sex life is news at all.

GRIFFIN_LIZZARD's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:44 AM

indifferent I guess just about everybody should be locked up. be seeing you


Nope just prisoners rofl rofl rofl

adj4u's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:45 AM




AWWW POOR DAVEEE He screwed around, and hurt people,without the slightest amount of consideration, and now hes getting it in return.



WAAAAA POOR FREAKIN DAVEEE!!
frustrated Once again,it's all about the law. If the sex was consentual,Dave did nothing wrong. Extortion is a crime. Sex between 2 consenting adults is not. If Dave was screwing the guys' girlfriend and she agreed,Dave did nothing wrong. You can't extort from someone if they are screwing your girlfriend. be seeing you


well are you saying it is ok to give your word then ignore it


if ones word is worthless

then what are they actually worth

it may not be agaist the law (which may not be the case he was in a contract with his wife and he broke that contract so a contractal law was probably broken)

and if she divorses him the fact he broke that contract will be major in the on going cost of his actions

not to mention the possibility that those that worked for him may have felt their job was in danger if they did not "perform" there are many aspects behind the forefront of this situation

and this was a kiss put down thread in the beginning but as the opening poster posted on the off topic remarks i guess it is still on point


:wink: laugh laugh laugh laugh


but hey what do i know




Shouldn't it be between him and his wife if he cheated? Not him, the rest of the world and his wife.


ask him that

he is the one that said it on national tv

well actually international tv

and i was not speaking of him specifically

i was answering a remark made saying it was not against the law

i did not mention anyones name or any specific case

i asked is it k to.........


----------

and as i showed in a later post it is against the law in new york

so i guess the state feels it is not just between the those in the relationship

flowerforyou

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:48 AM
You do know the reason he said it on TV, right?

prisoner's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:54 AM


indifferent I guess just about everybody should be locked up. be seeing you


Nope just prisoners rofl rofl rofl
rofl I have dated several married women in my life. I have never been charged with a crime. So much for your law & order.smokin be seeing you

GRIFFIN_LIZZARD's photo
Wed 10/07/09 09:56 AM



indifferent I guess just about everybody should be locked up. be seeing you


Nope just prisoners rofl rofl rofl
rofl I have dated several married women in my life. I have never been charged with a crime. So much for your law & order.smokin be seeing you


LOL Someday it will be a crime to say be seeing you....

adj4u's photo
Wed 10/07/09 10:00 AM
Letterman, 62, began dating Lasko in 1986, and they have a son, Harry, who was born in November 2003. All the affairs took place before Letterman's marriage, said Tom Keaney, spokesman for Letterman's production company, Worldwide Pants.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/05/david-letterman-apologize_n_310356.html

good catch grif


and yes

he did it for ratings and it worked

if he plays for the ratings

then he deals with the rantings

and even tho it was b4 he was married it was still whaile he was living with his wife

so it was deception and adultery just he same