Topic: Do we have enough Troops to Invade Iran?
no photo
Thu 09/17/09 10:39 PM
This is tooooo funny! laugh

Ladylid2012's photo
Thu 09/17/09 10:40 PM

This is tooooo funny! laugh


what are you laughing at???

rofl

no photo
Thu 09/17/09 10:40 PM

speaking academically, not to whether we should or not

but just to whether we could

I think we could but it would take every thing we have. And it would require the help of the British and prolly French and Italian and Spanish. and of course Israel

Syria would fight with Iran. And the Sudan and Somalia and Yemen. The Saudis might go either way. And Egypt might go either way. And Pakistan

The Shia and the Sunni don't get along real well. Turkey would probably go with us but if they didnt it could get real ugly

It would definitly be World War 3

the Muslim world against the Western World




All it would take is 300 Spartans. laugh

no photo
Thu 09/17/09 10:42 PM


This is tooooo funny! laugh


what are you laughing at???

rofl


"Trying to get a date with that girl..." laugh

Sorry....I just found it humorous. slaphead

no photo
Thu 09/17/09 10:45 PM
Seriously, I think the bottom line on this debate is "So What". So what if they do get a nuke....they get to join the Mutual Assured Destruction Club. They won't be able to use them because they know if they do, they will be wiped off the map.

no photo
Thu 09/17/09 11:04 PM

Seriously, I think the bottom line on this debate is "So What". So what if they do get a nuke....they get to join the Mutual Assured Destruction Club. They won't be able to use them because they know if they do, they will be wiped off the map.


Some times I think some folks don't realize that People are people everywhere, and they are just as afraid of us as we are of them. All this blustering and nuclear power... they want it just to be in the same position we are. So they can call our bluff as easily as we can bluff theirs. I am not so sure I can blame them. It must be a very insecure feeling to know that you are at the mercy of one country.

Yes one idiot can push a button, but even people of one culture don't trust eachother enough to let one person have that much power. It's still a smaller percentage of people who want to die that bad, I think... I hope...

Geezuz did that make sense? I am so tired and don't have he sense to go to sleep.. lol

jamesfortville's photo
Fri 09/18/09 12:13 AM
Edited by jamesfortville on Fri 09/18/09 12:19 AM
“Do we have enough troops to invade Iran?

The first time the Shah got kecked of the peacock throne a few CIA agents picked him up dusted him off and put him back on the throne but Senator Church destroyed that capability.

oldsage's photo
Fri 09/18/09 02:57 AM
Note from Mod old sage.

I cleaned this thread up, this morning.

Site RULES; DO NOT ALLOW calling people or their posts "stupid" as a fact.

You are ALL intitled to "YOUR OPINION".

Also, when some breaks a rule or creates drama, WHY do people feel the need to quote them. Cleaning a thread up, it all gets deleted.

Now, play by the rules, PLEASE??

Mod
Don

no photo
Fri 09/18/09 05:38 AM
Uh oh.....flowerforyou


no photo
Fri 09/18/09 08:15 PM
bizarre, i dont think you should go to war, with anyone, America has messed with so many nations, youll just end up killing the whole world, good on ya america

Ladylid2012's photo
Fri 09/18/09 08:22 PM

bizarre, i dont think you should go to war, with anyone, America has messed with so many nations, youll just end up killing the whole world, good on ya america


drinker

robert1652's photo
Fri 09/18/09 08:25 PM
No need for us to do
Friendship with Russia and China= card Blanche for Israel to nuke them first and argue about it later.
following nuking by Israel enter in if needed

warmachine's photo
Sun 09/20/09 01:14 PM
Well, a 3 front war?

Hitler lost his, because he was fighting a 2 front war, so historically, having enough troops isn't the question, the question would be: Are our leaders smarter than Hitler and his assistants?

Or are they just the same...

willing2's photo
Sun 09/20/09 01:33 PM

Well, a 3 front war?

Hitler lost his, because he was fighting a 2 front war, so historically, having enough troops isn't the question, the question would be: Are our leaders smarter than Hitler and his assistants?

Or are they just the same...

Wouldn't invading Somalia already put us in that 3 front position?

warmachine's photo
Sun 09/20/09 01:53 PM
Yeah, I think technically it would.

no photo
Sun 09/20/09 06:17 PM

speaking academically, not to whether we should or not

but just to whether we could

I think we could but it would take every thing we have. And it would require the help of the British and prolly French and Italian and Spanish. and of course Israel

Syria would fight with Iran. And the Sudan and Somalia and Yemen. The Saudis might go either way. And Egypt might go either way. And Pakistan

The Shia and the Sunni don't get along real well. Turkey would probably go with us but if they didnt it could get real ugly

It would definitly be World War 3

the Muslim world against the Western World


i totally agree with you. It would be world war 3 and the end of the world as we know it. Why shouldnt iran have nuclear capabilities ? I know because the region and their country are unstable but look at what has happened in the west this past year, are we any more stable than they are ?

warmachine's photo
Sun 09/20/09 06:23 PM
As a side note, Iran does big business in Oil with China and Russia. Does anyone here really thing that those 2 will sit back while the U.S. bombs their provider putting them into an energy crisis?

peppydog50's photo
Sun 09/20/09 06:32 PM
Iran does not have nuclear weapons now we must make sure that they do not get them. War with them or anyone else should be avoided unless there is no alternative.

tohyup's photo
Sun 09/20/09 06:34 PM

Why would anyone want to invade Iran?

What a silly thought.

such an invasion would trigger the use of the stupid weapons...

Duh.

If they have 'leaked' this much the truth is far worse.

They do try to keep us somewhat in the dark on these things.

The neo cons want it invaded and when in doubt just see what Henry Kissinger.....etc said and are saying about Iran .

jamesfortville's photo
Sun 09/20/09 06:35 PM

Well, a 3 front war?

Hitler lost his, because he was fighting a 2 front war, so historically, having enough troops isn't the question, the question would be: Are our leaders smarter than Hitler and his assistants?

Or are they just the same...
In WWII we, the allies, were fighting a four or five front war. What we did was put our resources into the weakest front and win there and move on. We didn’t try to win every where at once. No, I wasn’t
there but I remember.