100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: pedophile/pop star | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I think people that admired his music and all the good he did in the world wont even think of accusations, cause thats all they were, He deserves some measure of respect as almost all of us do!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A man has died, a fellow living human being has lost his light. And PEOPLE want to >>>>>NOW?????? Bring in the matter of what kind of man he was and everything bad and nasty as to "WHAT" give him a proper goodbte? I guess those who judge feel its just conversation because YOU didn't really know him or have him as a ralative so who cares HUH.... ME,,,,,ANY life is still a life that we should ALL NOTICE, that it ended ......But let a begger on the street be found dead and no one even would notice or care,,,,,LET ALONE FIND REASON to bash them for their life lived....   NOW we can't even DIE w/o people talking about it,,WHEN if they were still living didn't find talking about them any importants.. i agree with later half thatwhy i am kind of frustrated with all the media hype about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the pop star i knew died a long time ago ............ who can really morn a pedophile???? i understand he was conflicted "childhood stress" but why did other children need to share in that???? ...................sorry but come on that guy ###### little boys  Got proof? Riiiight, was anyone who's slammin MJ there when it happened?  I recall that he was found not guilty so was OJ the first time. i think it's possible for him to be guilty or not guilty. i don' think he should really be mourned because if he was a pedophile i definitely don't think he should get that much sympathy. if he wasn't a pedophile then it's sort of a disgrace to show him this much love now instead of when he was alive and needed it. his death is a good thing because he longer has to suffer ridicule. I think the real tradedgy is people won't really know whether he was a pedophile or not. there probably won't be any closure for that. it might forever be in myth and speculation; much like the JFK assassination.  Why the OJ comparison?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree Mirror, what the hell does O. J.have to do with this? AS far as I know, O J is still alive!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
crimsonphoenix
on
Fri 06/26/09 03:38 PM
|
|
it an example that law is faliable and just because someone is not found guilty doesn't mean that they are not. most people i've met or talked to believed that OJ and MJ were both guilty. the comparison is bit unfair to mj because OJ was later arrested so it's much more likely that he was guilty. unfortunately it's the only popular case of people believing non-guilty defendants are guilty that i can think of.
the similarites are: they were both hyped cases in the media and had a lot of buzz afterwards. a considerable amount of people believed they were both guilty. few people know for certain whether they were guilty. people were angry about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it an example that law is faliable and just because someone is not found guilty doesn't mean that they are not. most people i've met or talked to believed that OJ and MJ were both guilty. the comparison is bit unfair to mj because OJ was later arrested so it's much more likely that he was guilty. unfortunately it's the only popular case of people believing non-guilty defendants are guilty that i can think of. both of them also faced two similar cases. luckily OJ lost the second one but MJ won both of his. It was shown in court during the MJ trial that the accuser and his family were lying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think people that admired his music and all the good he did in the world wont even think of accusations, cause thats all they were, He deserves some measure of respect as almost all of us do!! I admire his music, but i cant turn a blind eye to the accusations. In fact, i think its quite sick that many people seem to beable to. I cant wait for all the new evidence and accusations to come to light. I have previously said, he is unable to shut people up now. People should be careful how much support they are showing him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here In America U are innocent until proven guilty, NOT the other way around!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree Mirror, what the hell does O. J.have to do with this? AS far as I know, O J is still alive!! and if OJ keels over before i do, you can rest assured that i won't be showing him any more respect than i am michael. i think OJ's guilty as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here In America U are innocent until proven guilty, NOT the other way around!! Only in the eyes of the law. Its the same in most countries of the world. Lets not get nationalistic. And if you put your total trust in the law, thats up to you. With a little research i could probably find you countless people who have been found not guilty, who have then gone out to murder, rape and molest others. And also many people who have been falsly convicted. Anyway not guilty, even in the eyes of the law, does not mean 'innocent'. There is a difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here In America U are innocent until proven guilty, NOT the other way around!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree Mirror, what the hell does O. J.have to do with this? AS far as I know, O J is still alive!! because o j was also acquitted of the charges brought against him as was m j but not very often did that seem to matter when it came to talking about him so why the double standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
crimsonphoenix
on
Fri 06/26/09 03:32 PM
|
|
it an example that law is faliable and just because someone is not found guilty doesn't mean that they are not. most people i've met or talked to believed that OJ and MJ were both guilty. the comparison is bit unfair to mj because OJ was later arrested so it's much more likely that he was guilty. unfortunately it's the only popular case of people believing non-guilty defendants are guilty that i can think of. both of them also faced two similar cases. luckily OJ lost the second one but MJ won both of his. It was shown in court during the MJ trial that the accuser and his family were lying good point, i definitely remember that the parents were shady. : ) I am not saying he's guilty or not gulity for sure. i think there is definitely too much speculation and evidence for him to be given a clean slate again. like it was when he was in the 80's. if I was MJ and was innocent i would have volunteered for the polygraph or would of at least written an autobiography to prove i was. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree Mirror, what the hell does O. J.have to do with this? AS far as I know, O J is still alive!! because o j was also acquitted of the charges brought against him as was m j but not very often did that seem to matter when it came to talking about him so why the double standard It was shown in court before the world that the accuser and his family were liars and out for money
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here In America U are innocent until proven guilty, NOT the other way around!! then why did robert blake sit in jail for over a year awaiting trial no it is a misconception repeated so often you are brain washed into thinking it as sad as it is ---it is what it is if they do not like you they set the bail so high you have no chance of meeting it but if you are rich who cares but you or i could we raise a million in bail money (no me) but some politician could so bail is not a properly applied function of the judicial system see you got me started  sorry for the 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 06/26/09 03:35 PM
|
|
it an example that law is faliable and just because someone is not found guilty doesn't mean that they are not. most people i've met or talked to believed that OJ and MJ were both guilty. the comparison is bit unfair to mj because OJ was later arrested so it's much more likely that he was guilty. unfortunately it's the only popular case of people believing non-guilty defendants are guilty that i can think of. both of them also faced two similar cases. luckily OJ lost the second one but MJ won both of his. It was shown in court during the MJ trial that the accuser and his family were lying and the glove did not fit (was shown in court) I agree Mirror, what the hell does O. J.have to do with this? AS far as I know, O J is still alive!! because o j was also acquitted of the charges brought against him as was m j but not very often did that seem to matter when it came to talking about him so why the double standard It was shown in court before the world that the accuser and his family were liars and out for money |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here In America U are innocent until proven guilty, NOT the other way around!! then why did robert blake sit in jail for over a year awaiting trial no it is a misconception repeated so often you are brain washed into thinking it as sad as it is ---it is what it is if they do not like you they set the bail so high you have no chance of meeting it but if you are rich who cares but you or i could we raise a million in bail money (no me) but some politician could so bail is not a properly applied function of the judicial system see you got me started sorry for the good point
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Fri 06/26/09 04:28 PM
|
|
Why can't we just think about the fact that he won't make music and dance for us anymore?
Why does it have to be all legal talk? The courts already had their day. The rest is all speculation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"If you consider it inappropriate for a man to look at a book of naked pictures with a child that's 13 or 14 years old -- then your answer would be yes."
Corey Feldman says he had such an encounter at Jackson's home when he says they stopped there on the way to Disneyland. "We went to his apartment, and I noticed a book that he had out on his coffee table. The book contained pictures of grown men and women naked. And the book was focused on venereal diseases and the genitalia." Feldman said the singer sat down with him and explained the photos to him. Feldman said, "I was kind of grossed out by it. I didn't think of it as a big deal. And for all these years, I probably never thought twice about it ... But in light of recent evidence ... I have to say that if my son was 14 years old -- 13 years old, and went to a man's apartment that was 35, and I knew that they were sitting down together talking about this, I would probably beat his azz." -ABC NEWS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
most people i've met or talked to believed that OJ and MJ were both guilty. Branch out more! Find more objective, and less judgmental, friends!
|
|
|
|
|
