100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Is it wrong to want to have sex with your 2nd cousin? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Do you live together?
The grass is always greener according to some.. Until they get what they "thought" they wanted.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
technically no but again we are together every freaking moment if not at my house then his.. werid enough.. I know..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 good luck i just don't think he's committed i'm personally not into the fwb i want my man to love me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like more than FWB if you spend that much time together.. I'm not into them but if I were I know I'd enjoy my alone time unless I wanted to be together... Heck I do that while in a relationship.... lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All I can say from my personal belief is that is still to close to family. Inbreeding, ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is the F'd up thing I know he loves me and I know that I am the best thing ever inhis life.. not just form him but everyone who knows us.. he just feels like a filure cause no job and obviously issues and doesnt want to commit till all is good finacially cause he " cant live on love"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Tue 06/09/09 11:34 PM
|
|
I think I am right in believing the way I do but need some one else's opinion.... please guide me through this.. I think it's wrong. When I was younger, I was dating a man and we later found out that he was my second cousin. We quit dating because of that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is the F'd up thing I know he loves me and I know that I am the best thing ever inhis life.. not just form him but everyone who knows us.. he just feels like a filure cause no job and obviously issues and doesnt want to commit till all is good finacially cause he " cant live on love" so he can commit to sex and being together every single day but you? He wants his cake and eat it too darlin', plain and simple... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genetically speaking there is no reason not to breed with even a first cousin. For thousands of years humans didn't have any other options. We lived on groups of only about 50 people. Everyone was related. The practice of not allowing cousins to marry was an attempt by the church to stop the ruling calsses from consolidating wealth. That's actually true. It was a rather popular method of keeping wealth within a ruling family- usually second-cousins were married, as it allowed for some genetic variety DESPITE being related by blood. But there were cases where first-cousins were married as well. It's said that some of the old-money families, like the Rockefellers, the Du Ponts, and the Rothschilds were able to maintain their fortunes by taking part in the same practices even today. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genetically speaking there is no reason not to breed with even a first cousin. For thousands of years humans didn't have any other options. We lived on groups of only about 50 people. Everyone was related. The practice of not allowing cousins to marry was an attempt by the church to stop the ruling calsses from consolidating wealth. I disagree. I think that there are genetic reasons to not breed with a first cousin. If there is a negative genetic marker, it multiples when one has a child with a family member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Tue 06/09/09 11:33 PM
|
|
That is the F'd up thing I know he loves me and I know that I am the best thing ever inhis life.. not just form him but everyone who knows us.. he just feels like a filure cause no job and obviously issues and doesnt want to commit till all is good finacially cause he " cant live on love" But...he's thinking about being with another woman. That changes everything. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genetically speaking there is no reason not to breed with even a first cousin. For thousands of years humans didn't have any other options. We lived on groups of only about 50 people. Everyone was related. The practice of not allowing cousins to marry was an attempt by the church to stop the ruling calsses from consolidating wealth. That's actually true. It was a rather popular method of keeping wealth within a ruling family- usually second-cousins were married, as it allowed for some genetic variety DESPITE being related by blood. But there were cases where first-cousins were married as well. It's said that some of the old-money families, like the Rockefellers, the Du Ponts, and the Rothschilds were able to maintain their fortunes by taking part in the same practices even today. That's how England did it for the longest time.. Pretty much where we got it... I don't agree with the Church part but don't know that they didn't have any involvment.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
again my thing is the 2nd cousin... he and I agrees on our terms.. and orignally we werent suppose to have feelings but that has obviously changed.. for BOTH of us... I would take it better if it was someone he could atleast introduce to his family but ... thats NOT going to happen.. and conviently he has chosen to start staying st his house more tonite since this all occurred 4 days ago.. hmmm WERID ait it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree. I think that there are genetic reasons to not breed with a first cousin. If there is a negative genetic marker, it multiples when one has a child with a family member. I have made it a point to study genetics. Although I'm not a PHD I am the kind of person that learns this kind of thing for kicks. Have you studied genetics at all? Do you have anything to back up your view on the subject? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's weird... Personally, I'd walk.. No man let's me know he might care for or want to be with someone else and I stick around...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genetically speaking there is no reason not to breed with even a first cousin. For thousands of years humans didn't have any other options. We lived on groups of only about 50 people. Everyone was related. The practice of not allowing cousins to marry was an attempt by the church to stop the ruling calsses from consolidating wealth. That's actually true. It was a rather popular method of keeping wealth within a ruling family- usually second-cousins were married, as it allowed for some genetic variety DESPITE being related by blood. But there were cases where first-cousins were married as well. It's said that some of the old-money families, like the Rockefellers, the Du Ponts, and the Rothschilds were able to maintain their fortunes by taking part in the same practices even today. That's how England did it for the longest time.. Pretty much where we got it... I don't agree with the Church part but don't know that they didn't have any involvment.. Not only that, but the ruling families of the era had often claimed to be "touched" by god, there by giving them the "right" to be where they were in terms of stature and social class. Feudalism was essentially founded on the whole caste system, whereby the "pious" ruling class essentially controlled over all others. The church, if nothing else, buddied up with the ruling class to get a share of the wealth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Too many men out there to put up with this JMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I packed up all his stuff and got it ready for him to go an he freaked out and said he felt like I was handing him his hat and was upset cause we were suppose to be Best Friends which we are but.. this is going to far for me I told him I cant watch him make a bad decision that he would regret forever
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I'm sorry it hurt you but I'm happy you're strong enough to stand your ground...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think I am right in believing the way I do but need some one else's opinion.... please guide me through this..  Not really but its not something to be encouraged
|
|
|
|
|
