Topic: Onward Christian Soldiers | |
---|---|
Okay Ladies and Gentlemen...we are fighting religious extremists and terrorist who act outside the law right?
Trouble is we are all those things too. Please visit the site and see what the religious extremists who acted outside the law did. This stuff makes me want to throw up. "This Sunday, GQ magazine is posting on its Web site an article adding new details to the ample dossier on how Donald Rumsfeld’s corrupt and incompetent Defense Department cost American lives and compromised national security. The piece is not the work of a partisan but the Texan journalist Robert Draper, author of “Dead Certain,” the 2007 Bush biography that had the blessing (and cooperation) of the former president and his top brass. It draws on interviews with more than a dozen high-level Bush loyalists. Draper reports that Rumsfeld’s monomaniacal determination to protect his Pentagon turf led him to hobble and antagonize America’s most willing allies in Iraq, Britain and Australia, and even to undermine his own soldiers. But Draper’s biggest find is a collection of daily cover sheets that Rumsfeld approved for the Secretary of Defense Worldwide Intelligence Update, a highly classified digest prepared for a tiny audience, including the president, and often delivered by hand to the White House by the defense secretary himself. These cover sheets greeted Bush each day with triumphal color photos of the war headlined by biblical quotations. GQ is posting 11 of them, and they are seriously creepy." http://men.style.com/gq/features/topsecret |
|
|
|
and those that break the law, face the law as well
but sorry...because someone has a religion doesn't make them extremists either |
|
|
|
well seeing as the bottom of each slide said
no distribution special handling it appears they where exercising thier personal freedom of religion if they where preaching these things to the public your post may have a ligit point even those in politics have freedom of religion (even if their actions are a bit foolish) |
|
|
|
well seeing as the bottom of each slide said no distribution special handling it appears they where exercising thier personal freedom of religion if they where preaching these things to the public your post may have a ligit point even those in politics have freedom of religion (even if their actions are a bit foolish) |
|
|
|
HA HA HA
"it appears they where exercising thier personal freedom of religion if they where preaching these things to the public your post may have a ligit point even those in politics have freedom of religion (even if their actions are a bit foolish)" If you cannot see the irony here you have very limited vision to be sure. WOW...just WOW Guess when Bush used the term "crusade" he really meant it. Funny too to see the same posters who feel religious people in the United States are attacked unjustly feeling it is perfectly reasonable to attack others because their religion is not theirs. The hypocrisy here is just too obvious to be ignored. As for "exercising thier personal freedom of religion" this is a public servant. He swore to protect and defend the Constitution not to wage a religious war. |
|
|
|
1cru·sade
Pronunciation: \krü-ˈsād\ Function: noun Etymology: blend of Middle French croisade & Spanish cruzada; both ultimately from Latin cruc-, crux cross Date: circa 1708 1: capitalized : any of the military expeditions undertaken by Christian powers in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries to win the Holy Land from the Muslims 2: a remedial enterprise undertaken with zeal and enthusiasm |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sun 05/17/09 08:52 AM
|
|
HA HA HA "it appears they where exercising thier personal freedom of religion if they where preaching these things to the public your post may have a ligit point even those in politics have freedom of religion (even if their actions are a bit foolish)" If you cannot see the irony here you have very limited vision to be sure. WOW...just WOW Guess when Bush used the term "crusade" he really meant it. Funny too to see the same posters who feel religious people in the United States are attacked unjustly feeling it is perfectly reasonable to attack others because their religion is not theirs. The hypocrisy here is just too obvious to be ignored. As for "exercising thier personal freedom of religion" this is a public servant. He swore to protect and defend the Constitution not to wage a religious war. such a short memory iraqs refusal to permit un inspectors to do their job was behind the reason for the war at the time this war was waged he had the backing of congress and around 70% of the american people so now that things are drawn out and did not go so well get out the flogging interments nearly a 20 point jump at the time of iraq war |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sun 05/17/09 08:55 AM
|
|
HA HA HA "it appears they where exercising thier personal freedom of religion if they where preaching these things to the public your post may have a ligit point even those in politics have freedom of religion (even if their actions are a bit foolish)" If you cannot see the irony here you have very limited vision to be sure. WOW...just WOW Guess when Bush used the term "crusade" he really meant it. Funny too to see the same posters who feel religious people in the United States are attacked unjustly feeling it is perfectly reasonable to attack others because their religion is not theirs. The hypocrisy here is just too obvious to be ignored. As for "exercising thier personal freedom of religion" this is a public servant. He swore to protect and defend the Constitution not to wage a religious war. such a short memory iraqs refusal to permit un inspectors to do their job was behind the reason for the war at the time this war was waged he had the backing of congress and around 70% of the american people so now that things are drawn out and did not go so well get out the flogging interments nearly a 20 point jump at the time of iraq war |
|
|
|
no the same ones that said they have not found any
but where refused access to key inspection points upon arrival and regardless at the time of iraq his ratings jumped around 20 points that would show support for said actions now we all know hindsight is 20/20 but you must go by the thought of the times or you are comparing apples and oranges |
|
|
|
such a short memory iraqs refusal to permit un inspectors to do their job was behind the reason for the war at the time this war was waged he had the backing of congress and around 70% of the american people Well duh, he had the backing of congress and the American people because he had convinced both there was actual evidence of WMD's not just a lack of proof that there wasn't. Of course 20 20 hind sight we know he was lying through his teeth and there was no such in evidence in hand and that it was manufactured so he could get approval to start the war. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sun 05/17/09 09:19 AM
|
|
If you dont believe the ones you are sending in why send them or make it a violation of a UN Resolution?
Personally I could care less about Bush or whether we go after his administration or what his approval ratings were or what Obama's is!!! Show me results!!! Bushs dam sure will linger for a long while!! As far as Obama time will tell! |
|
|
|
maybe it's a Texas saying or something...but I hear people say they are on a crusade (as in the 2nd definition....a mission) when running errands
|
|
|
|
like i said hindsight is 20/20
point is the backing was there it is easy to bash now knowing the way things are going now i bet if he would have went in there like he was advised to and it was over in the 3 years he predicted none of this would be an issue at this juncture in time |
|
|
|
like i said hindsight is 20/20 point is the backing was there it is easy to bash now knowing the way things are going now No it's easy to bash now knowing we were lied to, and deliberately. Countless American's have died for that lie. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sun 05/17/09 09:31 AM
|
|
like i said hindsight is 20/20 point is the backing was there it is easy to bash now knowing the way things are going now i bet if he would have went in there like he was advised to and it was over in the 3 years he predicted none of this would be an issue at this juncture in time Inspectors forsight was there were not any WMD...HE DID NOT LISTEN TO THEM but used the argument to go to war!!! Backing based on lies....ASK the inspectors!! |
|
|
|
like i said hindsight is 20/20 point is the backing was there it is easy to bash now knowing the way things are going now i bet if he would have went in there like he was advised to and it was over in the 3 years he predicted none of this would be an issue at this juncture in time Inspectors forsight was there were not any WMD...HE DID NOT LISTEN TO THEM but used the argument to go to war!!! Backing based on lies....ASK the inspectors!! I do care about going after him. Our status in the world is very damaged and we are now all but alone in our fight. The other countries that initially helped us have all left because they now feel as betrayed as the American people should be. Why should they ever join us again if we don't prove that we don't accept that kind of behavior from our leaders? |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sun 05/17/09 09:40 AM
|
|
iraq consistently refused inspections of eight palaces
against the un mandate how could they know if anything was or was not being produced ------------------------------------------------------------------ the history of un weapons inspections in iraq http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/cab/cab_3_0082to0095.pdf ------------------------------------------------------------------- and just to clarify i think they should investigate and if prove exists that laws were broken prosecute them as well (previous administration) |
|
|
|
iraq consistently refused inspections of eight palaces against the un mandate how could they know if anything was or was not being produced Have you seen the sh!t they can do? Due to surveillance we had a pretty good idea what was and wasn't there. and just to clarify i think they should investigate and if prove exists that laws were broken prosecute them as well (previous administration) Well at least we can agree on that. I really don't get it, a president screws his secretary and we want to string up by his balls and but screw the entire world and it's oh well. Easy to understand why we have so little world support right now. |
|
|
|
Well at least we can agree on that. I really don't get it, a president screws his secretary and we want to string up by his balls and but screw the entire world and it's oh well. Easy to understand why we have so little world support right now. well actually it was not about the screwing it was about lieing to congress well bush and his crew refused to testify under oath (so i guess that makes lying ok |
|
|
|
To me if we dwell on the past thats just were we will stay...
On a good note 3 foreclosed homes on my street were recently sold!!!!! Maybe I can get the value of my home back to what it was 20 yrs ago when I bought it!!!! |
|
|