Topic: looks over love? | |
---|---|
You may not like this, but it's the truth.
Men have been programmed by evolution to prefer women with certain physical characteristics because women that look like this are more likely to give birth to healthy children. For example, if there were ever men that liked women without breasts any children they had would have gone hungry and died. Any man who says looks don't matter to him feels himself to be unable to attract the "best" women and is willing to settle for a less desirable one. Sex with an ugly woman is better than no sex at all. Looks matter to women as well, but not as much as looks matter to men. This is because a man's health was less of a factor in his children's ability to survive. What mattered more was his standing within the tribe. A tribal leader's child was more likely to survive than someone on the bottom rung. So, leaders often had many wives and many children. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Puffins1958
on
Tue 05/05/09 12:18 AM
|
|
Beauty is...and always will be in the eye of the Beholder.
Please....don't ever forget that!!!! Some men....are just IDIOTS!!!!! |
|
|
|
i think attraction has to be there part of the basic stuff to start with everyone has their own definition of what attraction is agreed |
|
|
|
Be happy he dumped you for the skinny blonde. Whats worse is when they dump you for some big ugly garden ornament!!!
|
|
|
|
nah. just be glad that he is gone. he's got the commitment of an amoeba. it has nothing to do with you. i repeat that. it has nothing whatsoever to do with you. if he's a dork. and he is. then, you don't want to be with a dingleberry. it's a gigantic pain in the byootox!
so, bye bye doofus. hello to the real mr. wonderful! in addition, he is not worth another microsecond of thought on your part. put that energy into something fun!! |
|
|
|
You may not like this, but it's the truth. Men have been programmed by evolution to prefer women with certain physical characteristics because women that look like this are more likely to give birth to healthy children. For example, if there were ever men that liked women without breasts any children they had would have gone hungry and died. Any man who says looks don't matter to him feels himself to be unable to attract the "best" women and is willing to settle for a less desirable one. Sex with an ugly woman is better than no sex at all. Looks matter to women as well, but not as much as looks matter to men. This is because a man's health was less of a factor in his children's ability to survive. What mattered more was his standing within the tribe. A tribal leader's child was more likely to survive than someone on the bottom rung. So, leaders often had many wives and many children. aaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhhhh signed, the evolutionary freak! |
|
|
|
Is there anyone that would say Angelina Jolie isn't attractive? Why is she attractive?
Because she embodies all the traits of a woman able to give birth to healthy children: Wide hips, narrow waist, long thick hair, clear eyes etc. These are all indacators of good health. If anyone disagrees with me feel free to add your thoughts and reasons. This is after all a discussion forum. I'm open minded and if I'm wrong about this, or anything else, I'll happilly admit to it. But, I do need to read an explanation as to why I'm wrong. Calling me stupid isn't an explaination, it's only an insult. Insults are the weapon of people with no amunition. |
|
|
|
Is there anyone that would say Angelina Jolie isn't attractive? Why is she attractive? Because she embodies all the traits of a woman able to give birth to healthy children: Wide hips, narrow waist, long thick hair, clear eyes etc. These are all indacators of good health. If anyone disagrees with me feel free to add your thoughts and reasons. This is after all a discussion forum. I'm open minded and if I'm wrong about this, or anything else, I'll happilly admit to it. But, I do need to read an explanation as to why I'm wrong. Calling me stupid isn't an explaination, it's only an insult. Insults are the weapon of people with no amunition. ME, i find ms Jolie positively unattractive, now about Brad Pitt........ |
|
|
|
You may not like this, but it's the truth. Men have been programmed by evolution to prefer women with certain physical characteristics because women that look like this are more likely to give birth to healthy children. For example, if there were ever men that liked women without breasts any children they had would have gone hungry and died. Any man who says looks don't matter to him feels himself to be unable to attract the "best" women and is willing to settle for a less desirable one. Sex with an ugly woman is better than no sex at all. Looks matter to women as well, but not as much as looks matter to men. This is because a man's health was less of a factor in his children's ability to survive. What mattered more was his standing within the tribe. A tribal leader's child was more likely to survive than someone on the bottom rung. So, leaders often had many wives and many children. from now on,i'm stealing what you wrote and i'm sticking with that |
|
|
|
...i think we are all superficial to some degree...some prefer outer beauty to inner beauty and vice versa..we all have a combination of both in mind that we feel we are best suited with ..but then the propensity for being wrong still exist..if for nothing else people change or they dont actually represent who they portray... |
|
|
|
You sir are wide of the point. Perhaps you would rather make love to Brad, but that doesn't change the fact that Angie is a very attractive woman.
Although personally, I think she's geting a little old. |
|
|
|
You sir are wide of the point. Perhaps you would rather make love to Brad, but that doesn't change the fact that Angie is a very attractive woman. Although personally, I think she's geting a little old. it's all in the eye of the beholder and i can assure u ms jolie is not attractive to me. now if u had said someone from yrs gone by like ms dietrich i would have agreed with u. |
|
|
|
Alright then, how about Veronica Lake?
|
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Tue 05/05/09 02:48 AM
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
How about totie fields or bea arthur?
Do you see my point? |
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Tue 05/05/09 02:50 AM
|
|
nah. just be glad that he is gone. he's got the commitment of an amoeba. it has nothing to do with you. i repeat that. it has nothing whatsoever to do with you. if he's a dork. and he is. then, you don't want to be with a dingleberry. it's a gigantic pain in the byootox!
so, bye bye doofus. hello to the real mr. wonderful! in addition, he is not worth another microsecond of thought on your part. put that energy into something fun!! |
|
|
|
Edited by
gayfifer
on
Tue 05/05/09 03:07 AM
|
|
error
|
|
|
|
Edited by
gayfifer
on
Tue 05/05/09 03:02 AM
|
|
How about totie fields or bea arthur? Do you see my point? nope coz ur point is about heterosexual men being programmed not men in general |
|
|
|
Edited by
TexasScoundrel
on
Tue 05/05/09 03:42 AM
|
|
My point is about PEOPLE being programmed by evolution and not by the media. Being gay makes no differance. You still know what an attractive woman looks like. The Y chromosome that makes us men is tiny. Much smaller than the X chromosome. This means that all men, gay or otherwise have much more in common with one another than women do.
|
|
|
|
Attraction is a big part of a relationship...bottom line. Superficial or not that's just the way it is. The sonner we accept that we are not attracted to everyone and everyone is not attracted to us, the easier it is. For women, attraction usually entails more than physical aspects....can't speak for the men...I am guessing that is what draws them in but probably not what keeps them.
|
|
|