Topic: Wolverine mess-up. | |
---|---|
Has anyone seen both the bootleg and finished product yet? Just wondered if there more than what was in the bootleg, besides some special effects.
|
|
|
|
Has anyone seen both the bootleg and finished product yet? Just wondered if there more than what was in the bootleg, besides some special effects. http://www.watch-movies-links.net/movies/x-men_origins_wolverine/ I forget which one it is, but it has great quality as something like a dvd movie feel to it. Remember: it is sharing, not stealing. ;) |
|
|
|
Gambit was cool in the movie... I would have went a different way with the acter...
After everyone has seen it, I want to discuss the end of credits clip... don;t want to spoil... Apparently that are 5 or 6 different ones... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Thoughtfulthug
on
Tue 05/05/09 12:46 PM
|
|
It would've been better if Gambit was played by Johnny Depp and the ending entails that the sequel would be in the development where Wolverine and Gambit travel together and getting in such a hell of a trouble. Would make a great odd couple/dynamic duo superhero movie.
|
|
|
|
The trailers show wolverine as a little boy with those metal implants. But it was already established in an earlier movie that the metal lining his bones and those metal claws were implants put in because of his mutations. His mutation was an amazing ability to heal which also seemed to slow down his aging process. Because of the efficiency of his cellular regeneration. Looks like they just want to keep changing his history and his mythology over and over and over. Okay, so he was originally supposed to be a brief, throw away character. But the popularity of the character made him a permanent character. You would at least think the movies would have kept the story they decided on in the first installment of the x-men. My understanding was that he had the "claws" because of his mutation and that the metal titanium coating just made him more invinsible. |
|
|
|
The trailers show wolverine as a little boy with those metal implants. But it was already established in an earlier movie that the metal lining his bones and those metal claws were implants put in because of his mutations. His mutation was an amazing ability to heal which also seemed to slow down his aging process. Because of the efficiency of his cellular regeneration. Looks like they just want to keep changing his history and his mythology over and over and over. Okay, so he was originally supposed to be a brief, throw away character. But the popularity of the character made him a permanent character. You would at least think the movies would have kept the story they decided on in the first installment of the x-men. My understanding was that he had the "claws" because of his mutation and that the metal titanium coating just made him more invinsible. |
|
|
|
It would've been better if Gambit was played by Johnny Depp and the ending entails that the sequel would be in the development where Wolverine and Gambit travel together and getting in such a hell of a trouble. Would make a great odd couple/dynamic duo superhero movie. They had their own comic series when I was a kid, I don't remember much about it, except I loved it |
|
|
|
Edited by
Thoughtfulthug
on
Tue 05/05/09 01:10 PM
|
|
It would've been better if Gambit was played by Johnny Depp and the ending entails that the sequel would be in the development where Wolverine and Gambit travel together and getting in such a hell of a trouble. Would make a great odd couple/dynamic duo superhero movie. They had their own comic series when I was a kid, I don't remember much about it, except I loved it Yeah, too many comic book reading in my youth. LOl |
|
|
|
The trailers show wolverine as a little boy with those metal implants. But it was already established in an earlier movie that the metal lining his bones and those metal claws were implants put in because of his mutations. His mutation was an amazing ability to heal which also seemed to slow down his aging process. Because of the efficiency of his cellular regeneration. Looks like they just want to keep changing his history and his mythology over and over and over. Okay, so he was originally supposed to be a brief, throw away character. But the popularity of the character made him a permanent character. You would at least think the movies would have kept the story they decided on in the first installment of the x-men. My understanding was that he had the "claws" because of his mutation and that the metal titanium coating just made him more invinsible. I remember now, thanks...lol |
|
|
|
I haven't seen it yet but plan too. I watch movies for entertainment, not to dissect them. But thanks for all the information I have read about it and the comic books. I will also be watching for the "eye candy", lol.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
nicenurse64
on
Fri 05/08/09 09:49 AM
|
|
I just saw it yesterday & i have to say I was a bit disappointed in the characters/actors/plot. BUT....
Or should i say "BUTT" (Hugh Jackman's Naked Tushy) made the film well worth the ticket price if you gals are looking for some "fantasy beefcake" |
|
|