100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Conspiracy Hypocrites... | |
|---|---|
|
|
 I must admit that you certainly are a man of conviction W.M.
I have seen you stay consistent for months (almost a year)and even when there was a change of power in the goverment you still remain consistent with your message.
Consistent... I'll accept that compliment. It's generally easy to see how these folks in power are going to act, all you have to do is see who they're surrounding themselves with. Thats how I was able to see through Bush and it was just as easy to see through Obama with the same tactic. Now had Obama surrounded himself with a folks who didn't have a huge documented history of pushing for globalism and tyranny, I would have stepped back, gave him a chance to show he was a man of his word and then pointed out when it became obvious what his intentions were. Consitency on this issue is easy, those in power make it easy to continue championing the Constitution, bashing my intellect against the movement towards a Global fascsist system and generally just doing the WTF dance as our Soveriegnty, freedom and liberty gets does the turd swivel after the flush. You know the WTF dance... it's the one where someone is so flabbergasted at a situation that they just kind of bounce from foot to foot while pointing at something... yea... I knew you've done the WTF dance too!  I guess Im just a little jealous of seeing the right wingers thinking that you are on their side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been getting that crap term "conspiracy theory" thrown at me more and more, especially since Obama has taken office. I wanted to come correct with something. I find myself amused in a sort of abstract way, that the concept of a Conspiracy is pooh poohed immediately, especially by the supporters of which ever side happened to be in the fake seat of power when the event occured... Yet, for example, even the media in this country was quick to parrot the "conspiracy" idea when Benazir Bhutto was assassinated, with everything from ISI, Taliban, AL Qaeda involvement being included in the conspiracy. It was never touted as a "lone gunman" theory, it was automatically a Conspiracy. So where did this irrational, retarded concept come from that America, historically and currently is somehow immune from people who would Conspire? Anybody in our history who has been killed under questionable circumstances, the case is always the same... "No Conspiracy here folks, nothing to see, move along... you, who are still looking, you're a tinfoil nut." This is how all these questionable situations have been treated, whether it's big time, like JFK, 9/11, CIA running drugs or MLK. or smaller, like Vince Foster or Debrah Jean Palfrey. So when it comes to any other place on the planet, Conspiracies are prevalent and accepted, but in the Good ole U.S. of A, no such thing, completely exempt? Yet, it's mainline history that our very own Government has had people assassinated in other countries, overthrown leaders or even whole governments in other nations, yet they couldn't possibly ever consider doing these things here at home...I mean, assassinations in Guatemala, propping up Pinochet, the Shah, Saddam and Bin Laden, these are all our doing, but we aren't allowed to even consider or contemplate that those same elements aren't doing the same things here? Why is that so hard to conceive, so hard to wrap ones mind around? What do you think about L.Ron Hubbard and Scientology?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CIA killed Kennedy The moon landing was faked There are alien spaceships in Area 51 There are alien bodies there, too. Sonny Bono was murdered And blah blah blah blah blah did you not hear they moved the space stuff to dayton come on now catch up w/times area 51 became to well known |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been getting that crap term "conspiracy theory" thrown at me more and more, especially since Obama has taken office. I wanted to come correct with something. I find myself amused in a sort of abstract way, that the concept of a Conspiracy is pooh poohed immediately, especially by the supporters of which ever side happened to be in the fake seat of power when the event occured... Yet, for example, even the media in this country was quick to parrot the "conspiracy" idea when Benazir Bhutto was assassinated, with everything from ISI, Taliban, AL Qaeda involvement being included in the conspiracy. It was never touted as a "lone gunman" theory, it was automatically a Conspiracy. So where did this irrational, retarded concept come from that America, historically and currently is somehow immune from people who would Conspire? Anybody in our history who has been killed under questionable circumstances, the case is always the same... "No Conspiracy here folks, nothing to see, move along... you, who are still looking, you're a tinfoil nut." This is how all these questionable situations have been treated, whether it's big time, like JFK, 9/11, CIA running drugs or MLK. or smaller, like Vince Foster or Debrah Jean Palfrey. So when it comes to any other place on the planet, Conspiracies are prevalent and accepted, but in the Good ole U.S. of A, no such thing, completely exempt? Yet, it's mainline history that our very own Government has had people assassinated in other countries, overthrown leaders or even whole governments in other nations, yet they couldn't possibly ever consider doing these things here at home...I mean, assassinations in Guatemala, propping up Pinochet, the Shah, Saddam and Bin Laden, these are all our doing, but we aren't allowed to even consider or contemplate that those same elements aren't doing the same things here? Why is that so hard to conceive, so hard to wrap ones mind around? What do you think about L.Ron Hubbard and Scientology?
A deciple of Crowleys, L Ron Hubbard started scientology. Crowley is Bush's relative, and the list goes on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aliester Crowley is George W.Bush's true grandfather on his motherside. He was the founder of the church of Satan in England.
The song "Mr.Crowley" by Ozzy Osbourne is about him
I have to listen to that song again, for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..as far as kennedy ..how did lee harvey oswald know that the route of the presidential motorcade had been changed,as far as the iraq war,why did our borders go unguarded anyone with any military traing knows you secure your perimeter thats basic, but yet wasnt done while the illegals flowed over..what about the fact that since the war nothing else has happened here..do you really think homeland security is that good..if it is than maybe the rest of the government should take phuckin notes..osama's main objective was to destroy the economy..looks like the government is doing a good enough job on their own with their lack of oversight...and still no suicide bombers here..nothing since 911 that doesnt seem odd,not one insurgent in the mall firing off an uzi... nothing ...BS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been getting that crap term "conspiracy theory" thrown at me more and more, especially since Obama has taken office. I wanted to come correct with something. I find myself amused in a sort of abstract way, that the concept of a Conspiracy is pooh poohed immediately, especially by the supporters of which ever side happened to be in the fake seat of power when the event occured... Yet, for example, even the media in this country was quick to parrot the "conspiracy" idea when Benazir Bhutto was assassinated, with everything from ISI, Taliban, AL Qaeda involvement being included in the conspiracy. It was never touted as a "lone gunman" theory, it was automatically a Conspiracy. So where did this irrational, retarded concept come from that America, historically and currently is somehow immune from people who would Conspire? Anybody in our history who has been killed under questionable circumstances, the case is always the same... "No Conspiracy here folks, nothing to see, move along... you, who are still looking, you're a tinfoil nut." This is how all these questionable situations have been treated, whether it's big time, like JFK, 9/11, CIA running drugs or MLK. or smaller, like Vince Foster or Debrah Jean Palfrey. So when it comes to any other place on the planet, Conspiracies are prevalent and accepted, but in the Good ole U.S. of A, no such thing, completely exempt? Yet, it's mainline history that our very own Government has had people assassinated in other countries, overthrown leaders or even whole governments in other nations, yet they couldn't possibly ever consider doing these things here at home...I mean, assassinations in Guatemala, propping up Pinochet, the Shah, Saddam and Bin Laden, these are all our doing, but we aren't allowed to even consider or contemplate that those same elements aren't doing the same things here? Why is that so hard to conceive, so hard to wrap ones mind around? What do you think about L.Ron Hubbard and Scientology?
Religion started by a Sci Fi writer... at the end of the day, i approach it like this: My walk with my creator are my own to experience and organized religion is a trap laid by men. But thats just me, I do my very best to not criticize the faiths of others. Didn't Hubbard say something crazy about how writing paid okay, but creating a religion, thats where the money was? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been getting that crap term "conspiracy theory" thrown at me more and more, especially since Obama has taken office. I wanted to come correct with something. I find myself amused in a sort of abstract way, that the concept of a Conspiracy is pooh poohed immediately, especially by the supporters of which ever side happened to be in the fake seat of power when the event occured... Yet, for example, even the media in this country was quick to parrot the "conspiracy" idea when Benazir Bhutto was assassinated, with everything from ISI, Taliban, AL Qaeda involvement being included in the conspiracy. It was never touted as a "lone gunman" theory, it was automatically a Conspiracy. So where did this irrational, retarded concept come from that America, historically and currently is somehow immune from people who would Conspire? Anybody in our history who has been killed under questionable circumstances, the case is always the same... "No Conspiracy here folks, nothing to see, move along... you, who are still looking, you're a tinfoil nut." This is how all these questionable situations have been treated, whether it's big time, like JFK, 9/11, CIA running drugs or MLK. or smaller, like Vince Foster or Debrah Jean Palfrey. So when it comes to any other place on the planet, Conspiracies are prevalent and accepted, but in the Good ole U.S. of A, no such thing, completely exempt? Yet, it's mainline history that our very own Government has had people assassinated in other countries, overthrown leaders or even whole governments in other nations, yet they couldn't possibly ever consider doing these things here at home...I mean, assassinations in Guatemala, propping up Pinochet, the Shah, Saddam and Bin Laden, these are all our doing, but we aren't allowed to even consider or contemplate that those same elements aren't doing the same things here? Why is that so hard to conceive, so hard to wrap ones mind around? What do you think about L.Ron Hubbard and Scientology?
A deciple of Crowleys, L Ron Hubbard started scientology. Crowley is Bush's relative, and the list goes on. I had totally forgotten about Hubbards links to Crowley... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
War. Does the name George Noory mean anything to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
War. Does the name George Noory mean anything to you? Other than the fact he's the guy who took over for Art Bell on the Coast to Coast A.M. show, I don't know much about him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CIA killed Kennedy The moon landing was faked There are alien spaceships in Area 51 There are alien bodies there, too. Sonny Bono was murdered And blah blah blah blah blah Sonny Bono? Aliens? Moon landing? That's a typical tactic, lumping those who have real issues, real evidence with those whose issues are either just weird or speculative. Skull and Bones, not Aliens. Globalism, not Moon landings. One World Fascism, not Sonny friggin' Bono. As for the JFK situation. Whats more of a weirdo idea, a bullet that defies all the known laws of physics or a cabal of people seeking to used terrorist tactics, like assassination, to move a Government towards their own ends. Sadat was killed by members of his own Government, why is it impossible to surmise that JFK could have as well? Especially with all the extremely odd crap surrounding his death. How about this, explain to me, who has the power to call off a Secret Service detail? I would be going out on a limb here, but I would guess it isn't a "Magic Bullet". I must say you use the words, "real evidence," very loosely! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CIA killed Kennedy The moon landing was faked There are alien spaceships in Area 51 There are alien bodies there, too. Sonny Bono was murdered And blah blah blah blah blah Sonny Bono? Aliens? Moon landing? That's a typical tactic, lumping those who have real issues, real evidence with those whose issues are either just weird or speculative. Skull and Bones, not Aliens. Globalism, not Moon landings. One World Fascism, not Sonny friggin' Bono. As for the JFK situation. Whats more of a weirdo idea, a bullet that defies all the known laws of physics or a cabal of people seeking to used terrorist tactics, like assassination, to move a Government towards their own ends. Sadat was killed by members of his own Government, why is it impossible to surmise that JFK could have as well? Especially with all the extremely odd crap surrounding his death. How about this, explain to me, who has the power to call off a Secret Service detail? I would be going out on a limb here, but I would guess it isn't a "Magic Bullet". I must say you use the words, "real evidence," very loosely! Care to qualify that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do constantly when the need is evident.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions, fears, opinion, and twisted tales are not real evidence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions, fears, opinion, and twisted tales are not real evidence Again. Care to point something specific? Twisted Tales? Assumptions? I know you're totally in love with the Government now that it's Obama and not Bush, but I don't recall just posting a bunch of crap and not sourcing it, it's really not my issue that you care to disagree with it. As a side note, Gahndi said: "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." Even if you are a party of one with the truth, it doesn't change the fact that it's the truth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, not evidence?
4 buildings - 4 planes. WTC 7 building never got it's plane, you know, nothing ever goes to plan. But, the building collapsed anyway. Hahaha. Haha! No Evidence! Haha! Conspiracy theories! Are you blind? Listen, Mary Jane wanted to meet 4 guys, and have 4 children, one from each. But, when she met the 3rd one, she fell in love and married him. She never met the fourth guy. Can she still have his child though? Yes! According to anyone who believes not in reality but in government-sponsored conspiracy theories, she can have that baby without never meeting the guy! All she needs to do is to live close enough! |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Drivinmenutz
on
Sun 04/12/09 12:58 PM
|
|
What's really funny is the fact that the government itself doesn't consider the JFK assassination a shut case. In fact, they are now admitting that there were possibly two shooters.
Has anyone read the history on that case? How can you believe it wasn't a conspiracy of some sort? A well known mafia member, Jack Ruby shot Oswald dead before anyone could even question him. He did so in front of armed police, and got away with it. Some people are so closed minded it's frustrating. No, conspiracies don't exist. Unless i guess is Bush is president... Skepticism can be refreshing, and helps us all sleep better at night. But there is no reason to think that conspiracies were things of the past only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You ever seen that movie "V for Vendetta" WM?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments change,the lies stay the same."...James Bond in Goldeneye be seeing you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drivinmenutz,
Do you think the government doing the investigation might be the root of the problem? I think that government must definitely pursue the investigations to begin, if any part of it suspects the violation of the constitution. But, once the determination has been made that there will be an investigation, then no one who is tainted by ever belonging to any government should be allowed to touch anything during the investigations. Investigations, should be made by private firms only, and in competing environment. Only then, we can expect to see some answers, any answers. But as it is, the government always investigates the crimes perpetrated by the government itself, and we call that a system. |
|
|
|
|
