Topic: Religion, Spirituality and Tolerance | |
---|---|
AdventureBegins,
Ah, that is the rub. I haven't been offended by your beliefs, that would be stupid. I have been offended when someone incorrectly interpreted or intentionally twisted Christian doctrine. There is a vast difference between the two. You can tell me that Chrisianity is wrong and not bother me. You can twist the Gospel and I will defend it. Surely you can see the difference? |
|
|
|
Which Bible is your Bible of choice, Spider?
Or do you study only from the direct documents,the original transcripts, translated by yourself? |
|
|
|
Invisible wrote:
“Spider, you certainly have a great way of twisting and turning the words of others to suit your needs.” I have learned a long time ago that when I talk with people who twist and turn my words, I cut the conversation short and move on to talk with someone else. You can never have a sentient conversation with someone who refuses to see your point of view. They have a one-track mind for their agenda only. The only thing to do is to move on. Even attempting to point out to them the fact that they are twisting your words will have no effect because they will simply twist THOSE words too. Seriously Invisible. If you don’t like what Spider has to say, just skip over his posts. What could be simpler? I know you are trying to help him see the light of grace. But your efforts will be futile and only lead to your own frustration. In short, it isn’t worth it. |
|
|
|
I like the NIV, KJV and NASB. They are all wonderful and each has
something different to offer. |
|
|
|
I came to this conclusion myself, Abra, your words just help me to do it
that bit faster |
|
|
|
So you study three different translations, interpretations?
Is that right? I am not familiar with the abbreviations, excuse my ignorance.. |
|
|
|
Spider>
As I have stated many times I do not read your book. How then would I twist its words. I do not quote them. You do. |
|
|
|
NIV = New International Version. This version is translated into todays
English language. KJV = King James Version. It was first published in the 1600's, it's where all the "thees and thous" come from. NASB = New American Standard Bible. This version is considered by most to be the most accurate translation. I like to read the NASB. If I have trouble with a certain scripture, I consult NIV...it is often more clear. If I want to quote a scripture for literary effect, I quote KJV for it's flowery language. They are all three wonderful translations of the Bible. |
|
|
|
Three diferent versions.
Which one is it than that has not one jot or one tittle changed. As is required by your own faith. |
|
|
|
Thankyou spider.
Question...if when looking for clarification within these scriptures, it is not clearly defined, or correlated between all three, what do you do then? Do you have an advisor? A mentor, teacher as such? |
|
|
|
AdventureBegins,
Once again, you are jumping to conclusions. I didn't say you did. I was stating that I only get offended when someone distorts or twists the scriptures or doctrine of Christianity. When you ask a question and I answer it, it doesn't mean that the answer applies to you, it means that answer applies to the question. |
|
|
|
Spider> When I have a something to say to no one person in particular I
merely state it. When I have something to say to an individual I will place their name within the post. You addressed that perticular post to me. How am I not supposed to think you are posting to me when you reference my name. It either is or it isn't. Obviously you have studied debate. If you address a post to me you are talkin about me to then claim otherwise because you don't like my answer is childish. |
|
|
|
I use Strong's Concordance. If I still have questions, I pray, and
allow the Holy Spirit to explain the scripture to me. I should probably pray first, but I still lean on my own strength more than I should. 1 Corinthians 2:13-14 ------------------------------------------------------------ which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual thoughts with spiritual words. But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. ------------------------------------------------------------ The Holy Spirit teaches us the things of the Spirt of God. The entire bible is the words of the Spirit of God, therefore there is no better teacher. Jesus described the Holy Spirit as a better teacher than he was himself. |
|
|
|
The spirit of god comes not from the books. It comes from the source.
Therefore you need not the book to receive the spirit. all you need is to accept god and his spirit follows. |
|
|
|
AdventureBegins wrote:
When I have something to say to an individual I will place their name within the post. You addressed that perticular post to me. How am I not supposed to think you are posting to me when you reference my name. It either is or it isn't. Obviously you have studied debate. If you address a post to me you are talkin about me to then claim otherwise because you don't like my answer is childish. =========================================================================================== SpiderCMB replied: AdventureBegins, You said: "Since some of us have offended you by the way you post. Perhaps then by you own reasoning your faith is weak. " I replied: "Ah, that is the rub. I haven't been offended by your beliefs, that would be stupid. I have been offended when someone incorrectly interpreted or intentionally twisted Christian doctrine. There is a vast difference between the two. You can tell me that Chrisianity is wrong and not bother me. You can twist the Gospel and I will defend it. Surely you can see the difference?" I realize now that I should have quoted your question, I assumed that you would know I was addressing your accusation that I been offended by you posting your beliefs. With forums like these, with so many posts being made, nothing should be assumed, that was my mistake. |
|
|
|
Thankyou Spider.
Your faith in what you believe is strong. As is mine and AB's and Invisible's and Abra's. We all have conviction. They differ is all. |
|
|
|
AdventureBegins wrote:
The spirit of god comes not from the books. It comes from the source. Therefore you need not the book to receive the spirit. all you need is to accept god and his spirit follows. ========================================================================================== SpiderCMB replied: You make this kind of post frequently and I don't normally respond, because I know it is your opinion and I respect your right to have an opinion. You are stating your opinion here without any suggestion that you are wrong. You are presenting your belief with absolute conviction that you are right. You have criticized me for doing the same thing, do you feel that this makes you a hypocrite? |
|
|
|
Spider> In response to your post about my opinions.
It is not my opinion that all you need is god. It is my faith. With god all things are posible. Without god the sweetest words are but sour repetition of anothers wisdom. Should a man speak every word ever written in the name of god and yet not have faith in god those words will be but a hollow shell without substance. With each breath I take my faith grows stronger as his spirit breaths also within me. |
|
|
|
AdventureBegins,
Okay man, lol. Pride is a son of a *****, huh? You know you were wrong in how you have treated me for talking about my faith, but you just can't admit it. |
|
|
|
Spider wrote:
“You are stating your opinion here without any suggestion that you are wrong” To me there is a huge difference between AB’s belief and your belief. AB’s belief is simply that god exists and anyone can know god. Your belief is that a doctrine exists and the only way anyone can know god is through that particular doctrine. AB’s belief embraces yours (at least with respect to your personal path) You belief rejects his personal path. |
|
|