why can't we look at naked facts instead of whether a fact is dressed in liberal or conservative clothing?

Fox news is the worst reporting of the truth available on the television today besides Mad TV. All you have to do is take one of their stories and research it without bias and you will find they spin a whole lot more than any other station does.

You Bet!

really?? Does anyone remember why Dan Rather is out of a job??

Because in order to get to the naked truth you would have to be there when it happens. The best you can hope for is getting both sides of an issue and sifting through the information to get to the basic facts as possible.

I have always done this look at both sides of an issue and come to a conclusion. My conclusions are never one sided. Once I reach that conclusion I stick to it because it is researched by me.

I have been to the right wing sites there is a reason I call them hate sites and if the readers cannot see it they are blind.

When you elevate a self professed entertainer to the status of truth teller and then post spin based out of context quotes in order to attempt to bring some sort of school yard oh yeah well look what he said crap to justify a buffoon...you make yourself look foolish.

But that's okay...I understand...you are scared...

how can one recognize the truth and sift the truth out of the ashes when one has preconceived views of what the truth is. for the real truth might resemble the ashes to one with preconeived views of it and be thrown to the side with the other ashes.

Amen, you just labeled all Rush followers to a tee. They do not even want the capability to sift through the ashes, they want someone else to tell them what ashes to follow. So they follow.

I am not a follower of anyone. I have researched all my options and choose what is the closest to the truth I can find and go with it. One must always look for the underlying motive first and foremost and then they can sift correctly.

no.. what it is.. it's a reminder to all those talking heads that are out there going, "yeah we need to unite behind our president. it's just wrong to hope the presisdent fail. we're so totally abve that. We'd never do that.."

ok, well here's James Carville saying they're excited over pessimisim at the beginning of the bush presidency. then telling the press to keep quiet about it when he realized what an @ss he would look like saying that with the twin towers falling down in the background.

On the other hand, you got Rush talking espousing conservative principles, recognizing what is the true nature of the democrat policies and standing against them.

and in unrelated news, so-called "tea parties" are taking place all over the country where riled citizens are protesting the onslaught of taxation they know is to come with the Obama "recovery" plan..

Also unrelated, dow down 50% since summer high above 13,000..

Some comic relief

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=38583

Rush Limbaugh: Voice of the People?. The Republicans say Rush Limbaugh represents `real America.` We`re not so sure.

ahh, but ones who dig through the ashes and set good truth to the side as ash, do so believe the same thing of themselves.

the only thing i see proven here is that those who are believe themselves republican and those who believe themselves democrats are from the same cloth.

Didn't obama inherit the current financial mess less than two months ago from the Republicans, who for eight years under Bush assured us that the markets were not in any need of tighter regulation? Wasnt it GOP congressional members led by folks like Gingrich who pushed though the deregulation legislation that enabled the growth of "to big to fail" financial institutions that now have to be saved by the taxpayers?

more proof, cut from the same cloth.

really? care to watch these and then come back and give us your impression?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivmL-lXNy64&feature=channel

and then take a look at this

http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/npage/2_3051.html?mod=2_3002&sid=1643&page=us

set the time to decade, set bottom graph to volitility and looks at the past decade of the market..

did barney frank not say "there are no safety and soundness issues with fannie and fredie"? was there not a push in committee to get a new set of regulations of fannie and freddie and were it not for democrat foot stomping and thinly veiled cries of racism, some new legislation regulating fannie and freddie probably would have and needed to be passed..

come on now. let us cleave to the matter at hand..

Carville is a jerkoff of the highest order. I could care less what he and Begala have to say. The fact that the libs care what rush says, proves they are worried about him. If they weren't they wouldn't give a rats ass.

this is true.

We just think he is funny

as Rush says..." talent on loan from Gawddddd ! "...