Topic: Breakthrough in food safety. | |
---|---|
Edited by
Bushidobillyclub
on
Fri 03/06/09 05:21 AM
|
|
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090302183323.htm
Simple Device Can Ensure Food Gets To The Store Bacteria Free ScienceDaily (Mar. 5, 2009) — A Purdue University researcher has found a way to eliminate bacteria in packaged foods such as spinach and tomatoes, a process that could eliminate worries concerning some food-borne illnesses. Kevin Keener designed a device consisting of a set of high-voltage coils attached to a small transformer that generates a room-temperature plasma field inside a package, ionizing the gases inside. The process kills harmful bacteria such as E. coli and salmonella, which have caused major public health concerns. Keener's process is outlined in an article released online early in LWT - Food Science and Technology, a journal for the Swiss Society of Food and Technology and the International Union of Food Science and Technology. "Conceptually, we can put any kind of packaged food we want in there," said Keener, an associate professor in the Department of Food Science. "So far, it has worked on spinach and tomatoes, but it could work on any type of produce or other food." By placing two high-voltage, low-watt coils on the outside of a sealed food package, a plasma field is formed. In the plasma field, which is a charged cloud of gas, oxygen has been ionized and turned into ozone. Treatment times range from 30 seconds to about five minutes, Keener said. Ozone kills bacteria such as E. coli and salmonella. The longer the gas in the package remains ionized, the more bacteria that are killed. Eventually, the ionized gas will revert back to its original composition. The process uses only 30-40 watts of electricity, less than most incandescent light bulbs. The outside of the container only increases a few degrees in temperature, so its contents are not cooked or otherwise altered. Other methods of ozone treatment require adding devices to bags before sealing them to create ozone or pumping ozone into a bag and then sealing it. Keener's method creates the ozone in the already sealed package, eliminating any opportunity for contaminants to enter while ozone is created. "It's kind of like charging a battery. We're charging that sample," Keener said. "We're doing it without electrode intrusion. We're not sticking a probe in the package. We can do this in a sealed package." Keener said testing has worked with glass containers, flexible plastic-like food-storage bags and rigid plastics, such as strawberry cartons and pill bottles. He said the technology also could work to ensure pharmaceuticals are free from bacteria. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 40,000 cases of Salmonellosis, an infection caused by salmonella, are reported each year in the United States, causing 400 deaths. The CDC reports that about 70,000 E. coli infections are reported each year, causing dozens of deaths. Funding for Keener's research came from Purdue Agriculture. A patent on the technology is pending. Keener said the next step is to develop a commercial prototype of the device that could work on large quantities of food. Adapted from materials provided by Purdue University. Email or share this story: This would be a great thing for packaging centers to have available in some kind of large version. |
|
|
|
Good article. I don't even want to start about how tainted our food is in this nation, yet any kind of effort to prevent this would be great in my books.
|
|
|
|
If only they WOULD use ozone. But when have they ever done anything that makes sense? Unfortunately, they are going to use irradiation.
![]() -------------------------------------------------------- Nuclear Lunch: The Dangers and Unknowns of Food Irradiation The recent push for food irradiation fails to acknowledge the technology's inherent dangers, its intricate connections to the nuclear industry, and the FDA's failure to prove safety. Beginning in 1986, the FDA has given the green light to expose nearly our entire food supply to nuclear irradiation. Since then, staunch citizen opposition has kept the technology out of use. But the recent hamburger recall led both the food and nuclear industries to push hard for beef irradiation's approval. Its use in the beef industry would open the door to irradiation as the "solution" to contamination crises in all food groups, from poultry to fruits and vegetables. With beef irradiation's quick passage through the FDA approval process, citizen opposition, not government regulation, remains the critical component in keeping irradiated food off store shelves. And from the hazards inherent in the technology to the FDA's own admission that the safety studies are flawed, the risks involved with food irradiation far outweigh the presumed "benefits." Irradiation Basics Food is irradiated using radioactive gamma sources, usually cobalt 60 or cesium 137, or high energy electron beams. The gamma rays break up the molecular structure of the food, forming positively and negatively charged particles called free radicals. The free radicals react with the food to create new chemical substances called "radiolytic products." Those unique to the irradiation process are known as "unique radiolytic products" (URPs). Some radiolytic products, such as formaldehyde, benzene, formic acid, and quinones are harmful to human health. Benzene, for example, is a known carcinogen. In one experiment, seven times more benzene was found in cooked, irradiated beef than in cooked, non-irradiated beef. Some URPs are completely new chemicals that have not even been identified, let alone tested for toxicity. In addition, irradiation destroys essential vitamins, including vitamin A, thiamin, B2, B3, B6, B12, folic acid, C, E, and K; amino acid and essential polyunsaturated fatty acid content may also be affected. A 20 to 80 percent loss of any of these is not uncommon. Safety Studies Flawed |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bushidobillyclub
on
Sat 03/07/09 04:37 PM
|
|
If only they WOULD use ozone. But when have they ever done anything that makes sense? Unfortunately, they are going to use irradiation. ![]() -------------------------------------------------------- Nuclear Lunch: The Dangers and Unknowns of Food Irradiation The recent push for food irradiation fails to acknowledge the technology's inherent dangers, its intricate connections to the nuclear industry, and the FDA's failure to prove safety. Beginning in 1986, the FDA has given the green light to expose nearly our entire food supply to nuclear irradiation. Since then, staunch citizen opposition has kept the technology out of use. But the recent hamburger recall led both the food and nuclear industries to push hard for beef irradiation's approval. Its use in the beef industry would open the door to irradiation as the "solution" to contamination crises in all food groups, from poultry to fruits and vegetables. With beef irradiation's quick passage through the FDA approval process, citizen opposition, not government regulation, remains the critical component in keeping irradiated food off store shelves. And from the hazards inherent in the technology to the FDA's own admission that the safety studies are flawed, the risks involved with food irradiation far outweigh the presumed "benefits." Irradiation Basics Food is irradiated using radioactive gamma sources, usually cobalt 60 or cesium 137, or high energy electron beams. The gamma rays break up the molecular structure of the food, forming positively and negatively charged particles called free radicals. The free radicals react with the food to create new chemical substances called "radiolytic products." Those unique to the irradiation process are known as "unique radiolytic products" (URPs). Some radiolytic products, such as formaldehyde, benzene, formic acid, and quinones are harmful to human health. Benzene, for example, is a known carcinogen. In one experiment, seven times more benzene was found in cooked, irradiated beef than in cooked, non-irradiated beef. Some URPs are completely new chemicals that have not even been identified, let alone tested for toxicity. In addition, irradiation destroys essential vitamins, including vitamin A, thiamin, B2, B3, B6, B12, folic acid, C, E, and K; amino acid and essential polyunsaturated fatty acid content may also be affected. A 20 to 80 percent loss of any of these is not uncommon. Safety Studies Flawed |
|
|
|
The more I hear about food, and what is done to it during shipping and to keep it on the shelf for longer peroids of time, a farm or at least a small garden is bumped up higher on my list for the future. It seems like nature is telling us this is not how food works, cut down the need.
|
|
|