ive been surfin through several profiles and on alot if not all of them, have the heading on the ladies profile as "looking for mr right" or sumthing similar. who is mr right? he must be wat all the ladies want since almost every lady is looking for him. i can say im not mr right, or a knight in shining armor, besides, my armor is kinda dented up and a lil dull, taking it to the cleaners next week, anyways... shouldnt it be "mr. be-yourself" ? or "mr. good-enough for me" cuz its hard to find sumone thats just "right" everyone has their flaws and such. im not sure if there is a 100% compatiblity out there, what do you think? i just want to make a girl happy and that shes happy to be with me, even tho i may not be "mr right" hmm i hope this makes sense

I am definitely not Mr. Right.

well at least we are honest right?

It all makes sense when you become "Mr. Right for Her" and she's "Mz. Right for You"

When that happens, it doesn't matter who is right for anybody else...because that's their search. Yours will be over.

very interesting indeed. did u write a book? can i borrow it?

Im not right for anyone...........

If I can be called anything, it's Mr. Absolutely WRONG!!!!

well your pictures are right for alot of things

Well my headline says nothing about Mr. Right, it mentions slinkies so there!

Hey! I have slinkies!

i had a slinkie, it said ur not mr right! stop playing with me!!!

I agree.

One is not enough, for you.

You're right for how many???

Should I post a thread about it? Ask how many say that you're right for them?

You know the result, my friend.

that is a good idea, find out how many people like you

iz teh thred steelr nz i stold ur thred 41r34dy.

aw damn

You'll not find many that don't like her... Look at her...

It isn't about the looks. Told her that, from the get-go. Maybe that's why we stay friends.

Maybe for others it's about looks.

Their loss.
You know how it is.

oh I know she's smart and funny as well..

A man... who's... right.

Isn't that against International treaty?

isnt that in the constitution also?