Topic: This will not be here long | |
---|---|
sooooooo many other soluto\ion's though ,,,,,,up to him
|
|
|
|
OMG people!!! Get a life.....
|
|
|
|
its medicinal mannnnnnnnnnnnnnn I swear !!
and jeez I haven't gotten laid for sooooooooooooooooooooo long ,, I aint talkin bout that on here ,, whoa dude ...chill - axx |
|
|
|
Someone leaving here, to some it may not seem like a very big deal, but
as for me any one that gets banned needs to have a probable cause for it, and anyone who feels that they are not being treated right by others needs to be shown in the light of post what the issues were, and I was right here complaining and going nuts when you, Sluggo, were banned and I had thought Twosteper was banned, and 100 friends or 1 friend, a friend is a friend. |
|
|
|
HHHHEELLLLOOOO!!! BOB !! YOU GUYS POST THIS, NOW GET IN HERE & TALK TO US!!! WHERE ARE YOU SEEING THE """DRUGS""" ???? BECAUSE THEY MAKE POT THREADS???? I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY CRACK ROOMS &&&& THE SEX THREADS ARE JUST A WAY TO INTERACT WITH PEOPLE & NOT HAVE TO USE YOUR BRAIN, ALOT OF THE TIME THIS IS A SAFE PLACE TO ESCAPE FROM REALITY. WE DON'T TO THINK ABOUT HEART ACHES. FAMILY PROBLEMS WHAT EVER. SO TO SAY SURE I'LL DO HIM WOOHHOOO!! IS EASIER THEN RELIGION GOV. RELATIONSHIPS. ECT. OK!! WHAT DID YOU REPORT??? DID YOU SEND HIM THE EMAILS ?? NOW THIS SAYS "BYE EVERYONE " I KNOW YOUR READING THIS, SO GET YOUR AZZ IN HERE & BACK THIS SH*T UP!!!! |
|
|
|
ahh he already put the tail between the legs ,, deactivated,,,
tough guy ,, you know ,,eh..oh well hope the vent gave him closure............... |
|
|
|
Some people need to get a life . This is long hand for what I really
want to say! The guys incharge do have a nasty delimma to consider . Not saying they are right but think about it . Friggin PC is going to kill us ! |
|
|
|
i agree only his "choice" was to leave and it was like 10 days ago,,,
not sayin' he should've been attacked about sug...but he also coulda just e-mailed back and said wow sorry ,, i didn't know it would bother you i meant nothing by it>>>>this would've been to hard to do?his choice was to get upset by it and leave ,,i thought he was an alright guy |
|
|
|
now purple ? you have a dilemma goin' on?
|
|
|
|
As usual, I can't sort out what's real from what's hearsay, but if it is
true that twostep simply chose to deactivate because he didn't like emails he received - this has nothing to do with mike or van, or censorship, or PC. Its just a misunderstanding that got out of hand. |
|
|
|
and party on
|
|
|
|
Well gonnna put my two cents in now. lol First of all as far as the
contents of the threads here the ones you don't like stay out of them or help start new ones on new subjects. As far as the comment on Sug and someone being offened is about the most childish thing I have ever heard. That person all they had to say was please don't call me by Sug, Babe, sweety etc call me by my name. Yes there are women that don't understand that is only an expression and nothing meant by it for it is how some address all women they talk too. But if a person does not like it they need to speak up and not act like this is pre-school and run to the teachers they have more important things to think about than that. Now as far as Twostep deactivating his account. I'm sorry you felt the need to leave man. Over what a few e-mails about someone getting pissy about being called Sug. As far as what you had posted since you had been here they were always pleasant to all and never anything but a kind word to all. Hell the only one you ever cut down was yourself. Now for Twostep & bikerbobd, on both about deactivating ya know for two that are suppose to be men your sure not acting like it in my eyes. For two tough dudes ya'll sure are running like chickens is this how you have learned to deal with life? Thought that men stood up to what they believe in. All I can say is if they want to come back then come back if not drop all of this for it is getting childish as hell. Thought we had adults on this site. Sorry guys I thought ya'll were men this is not how a man I have visioned in my mind acts. If so I sure the hell don't want one that can't stand up for there own rights. I be damned if I would leave cause someone sent me a few hate mails over something so triva. And then go hide and let others fight my battle for me. Hell no, if it was me I would be right here I don't need others to beg me to stay and stand up to what I value most *my pride*. I hate to see good people go due to such childish reasons but this is getting way out of hand over something very stupid and childish. |
|
|
|
What the hell is sug? when I know what it is I am sure I will comment
back especially if this is something stupid???????????????????? |
|
|
|
like saying hun or sweety
|
|
|
|
TxsGal, Thank you for saying this. It was exactly what I wanted to
say! This whole situation is just so blown out of proportion, and like you said, it's childish. |
|
|
|
OMG, I was right it is something stupid ok now get a freakin life,if you
can't deal with stay off the damn computer 1st Ammendment FREEDOM OF SPEECH! Get a Life Rediculous!!!!! |
|
|
|
true I have opium thread running but I cannot help what the indians
smoked for peace........ I think the Op should come smoke the pipe....... report me please! I am addicted to that post it is such a rush........ |
|
|
|
um.......... ya sex I have postes there too!
padded underware for men need some they have them at wally world for men......... Sometimes men need alil' fluffin too! |
|
|
|
whitehairtataas say toke up be at peace
come to teepee for a wee wee |
|
|
|
One guy's opinion:
1. I like Steper. I have told him that a lot of us would like him to come back, but he really doesn't seem to be so inclined at this point. And that's his choice. I will say I find it totally incomprehensible that anyone could be offended by a harmless little term of endearment like "Sug." 2. There should be some sort of procedure in place to address the issue of people who file false abuse reports. I'm not saying that's what happened in this situation (I simply don't know enough of the background), but it could happen. 3. Re: sex and drug threads. Sex has its own forum, and I would assume that anything posted in there, as long as it's not abusive or assaultive towards another member, has a certain degree of protection. I personally don't care to discuss about 82% of the topics in that forum, but that's just me. I can always find another post or another forum to read. Drug threads -- well, the fact is, as above, if they're not breaking any of the rules, then you get into a sticky censorship situation. Me, I have no use for any thread that gets into drugs or alcohol at all. That's why I don't participate in the "pub" threads or the "rum" threads, or any of that. To me, if you're going to drink, you might as well just shoot yourself in the head -- it's the same thing, only the gun is a hell of a lot faster and there will be one less person likely to get loaded and plow their car into a school bus. BUT -- this sort of post doesn't violate any of the site rules, as far as I can see. So, again -- I just move on to another post. If you have a situation where someone is trying to use the site to sell drugs, then, yes, that's a problem, and it should be addressed. But that's not all that much different from trying to sell ANYTHING here, like that vitamin spammer we had a few weeks back, except that vitamins are generally legal to sell in the real world. If people want to talk about drugs or alcohol, and no one is being attacked or abused, then how do you justify taking any action against them? How is it any different from talking about religion or current events? I'm an atheist, but I wouldn't try to shut down the religion forum. If people want to believe in their own mythologies and superstitions, how does that hurt me? Again, I can move on to the next thread. Bob, I agree with your premise that "Sug," per se, is a whole lot less ofensive than some of the other things you see here. Where we differ is in that I don't think you can make a case for censoring topics (particularly chosen arbitrarily at the whim of one member or any small group of members) simply because we personally would prefer not to see those topics mentioned. That gets dangerously close to the "I want this site to be the way I want it, and to hell with what anyone else wants" mentality I have discussed in previous posts. I don't like the sex and drug threads any more than you do. But to ban them outright means that some members would no longer be able to discuss topics that are of importance to them, and I don't think that's right, either. So I just move past those theads.... |
|
|