You did. You quoted my post back from the very beginning of the thread and it annoyed a couple people.




My quote was taken from the very start of the topic. What do you not understand about it? It was perfectly on topic for that particular discussion which was taking place with the OP.



You did and I just quoted it.



And anyone else can look and see where I quoted your interruption 18 pages later while we were on the topic of evolution.

Don't be jealous voileazur.

Unrelated:

Note to self-"Never argue with idiots- they will lower you down to their level and beat you on experience."

I should report that remark but I wont. You got lucky.

ImGary said;

again twist and turn......my exact words stated above....And when does any topic in religion stay on topic....so again K....show me where I accused you of anything.


Maybe you should of read what I wrote...instead of glancing at what I wrote.

Feral I said ImGary is accusing me. Not you.

Gary is only straigtening out the fact that Krimsa is quilty of what she accused him of first.

Anyhow I'm off to strum my guitar while standing on a fence post- which is much more stimulating than continuing this immature discussion.

First off, I never accused you of anything. It was a couple other people that were annoyed because you interupted their discussion on evolution by quoting me from page one of this thread.



You can say that again.

"It is better to be thought of as a fool, then to open your mouth, and remove all doubt."

I stand by my note to self which applies here and refuse to respond further.

ImGary said:



Yep I stand by your quote also which is posted here and PROVES that you interupted.

Oh and then he changes the word "quote" to "note." Talk about slick willy.

All it proves is that I was responding to YOU because your name is the first word in the quote.LOL

Please stop- my stomach muscles are starting to cramp from laughing so hard.

She said "slick willy"! lmao

I NEVER denied it was my quote. But it was posted at the START of the thread when that topic was being discussed with the OP. Do you know what OP stands for? Original poster. Meaning I was discussing that topic with the person who created the thread.

You quoted me near the end of the thread or about 18 pages later when 4 people were discussing evolution (I and inkracer) included.

Now explain to me how that is not interrupting. Thanks.

I would love to carry on with this conversation but it might upset a lot of people over the off topic discussion.

So back to Evolution here.

Why is Evolution not compatible with the Bible?

Checkmate

Well since you already told me that you refuse to read the thread, I dont think I can debate this with you.

off topic- interrupting

How is me reminding you that you already told me you dont want to read the thread "off topic"? Dont people have a right to assess your ability to contribute?

Well I could tell ya voil where that fence post was before I gave it to K, to argue with...but I am a lady.

First you slam me for responding to a post that was earlier in the thread and not current.

Now you slam me for not reading all of the old posts.

Why should I read the old posts if as you state it upsets you and several other unnamed individuals when someone responds to an old post?

Your logic is faulty.

This simple example could speak of your ability to contribute.

I never slammed you personally. I didn’t care either way about it. It was a couple other people who were annoyed by it.



I am not slamming you. The Theory of Evolution is a complicated topic so I merely suggested (second time now) that you back up and read some of what we have been discussing. Or if you feel you can jump in, go for it.



They aren’t unnamed. Inkracer was one. He was wondering why in the hell the topic had gone from evolution to a quote about Jesus. It was because you grabbed my quote form page one. That is an interruption.