Topic: two completely different versions
warmachine's photo
Mon 01/05/09 06:53 AM
Israel’s ‘Fait Accompli’ in Gaza

Eric Margolis
Lew Rockwell.com
Monday, Jan 5, 2008

There are two completely different versions of what is currently happening in Gaza.

In the Israeli and North American press version, Hamas – “Islamic terrorists” backed by Iran – have in an unprovoked attack fired deadly rockets on innocent Israel with the intent of destroying the Jewish state.

North American politicians and the media say Israel “has the right to defend itself.”

True enough. No Israeli government can tolerate rockets hitting its towns, even though the casualty totals have been less than the car crash fatalities registered during a single holiday weekend on Israel’s roads.

The firing of the feeble, homemade al-Qassam rockets by Palestinians is both useless and counterproductive.

It damages their image as an oppressed people and gives right-wing Israeli extremists a perfect reason to launch more attacks on the Arabs and refuse to discuss peace.

Israel’s supporters insist it has the absolute right to drop hundreds of tons of bombs on “Hamas targets” inside the 360 sq km Gaza Strip to “take out the terrorists.”

Civilians suffer, says Israel, because the cowardly Hamas hide among them.

Actually, it is more like shooting fish in a barrel.

Omitting facts

As usual, this cartoon-like version of events omits a great deal of nuance and background.

While firing rockets at civilians is a crime so, too, is the Israeli blockade of Gaza, which is an egregious violation of international law and the Geneva Conventions.

According to the UN, most of Gaza’s 1.5 million Palestinian refugees subsist near the edge of hunger. Seventy per cent of Palestinian children in Gaza suffer from severe malnutrition and psychological trauma.

Medical facilities are critically short of doctors, personnel, equipment, and drugs. Gaza has quite literally become a human garbage dump for all the Arabs that Israel does not want.

Gaza is one of the world’s most-densely populated places, a vast outdoor prison camp filled with desperate people. In the past, they threw stones at their Israeli occupiers; now they launch homemade rockets.

Call it a prison riot, writ large.

Eyeing the elections

When the so-called truce between Tel Aviv and Hamas expired on December 19, Israeli politicians were in the throes of preparing for the February 10 national elections.

Israeli politics are playing a key role in this crisis.

Ehud Barak, the defense minister and leader of the Labour party, and Tzipi Livni, the foreign minister and leader of the Kadima party, are trying to prove themselves tougher than Benjamin Netanyahu’s hard-line Likud party – and one another.

Israel’s elections are only six weeks away, and Likud was leading until the air raids on Gaza began. Kadima and Labour are now up in the polls.

The heavy attacks on Gaza are also designed to intimidate Israel’s Arab neighbors, and make up for Israel’s humiliating 2006 defeat in Lebanon, which still haunts the country’s politicians and generals.

A fait accompli

When the air raids on Gaza began, Barak said: “We have totally changed the rules of the game.”

He was right. By blitzing Hamas-run Gaza, Barak presented the incoming US administration with a fait accompli, and neatly checkmated the newest player in the Middle East Great Game – Barack Obama, the US president-elect – before he could even take a seat at the table.

The Israeli offensive into Gaza now looks likely to short-circuit any plans Obama might have had to press Israel into withdrawing to its pre-1967 borders and sharing Jerusalem.

This has pleased Israel’s supporters in North America who have been cheering the war in Gaza and have been backing away from their earlier tentative support for a land-for-peace deal.

Israel’s successes in having Western media portray the Gaza offensive as an “anti-terrorist operation” will also diminish hopes of peace talks any time soon.

Obama inherits this mess in a few weeks. During the elections, Obama bowed to the Israel lobby, offering a new US carte blanche to Israel and even accepting Israel’s permanent monopoly of all of Jerusalem.

As he concludes forming his cabinet, his Middle East team looks like it may be top-heavy with friends of Israel’s Labour party.

Obama keeps saying he must remain silent on policy issues until George Bush, the outgoing US president, leaves office, but his staff appear happy to avoid having to make statements about Gaza that would antagonize Israel’s American supporters.

Obama will take office facing a Middle East up in arms over Gaza and the entire Muslim world blaming the US for the carnage in Gaza.

Unless he moves swiftly to distance himself from the policies of the Bush administration, he will soon find himself facing the same problems and anger as the Bush White House.

Arab deal killed

Israel’s Gaza offensive is also likely to torpedo the current Saudi-sponsored peace plan, which had been backed by all members of the Arab League.

The plan, now likely defunct, had called for Israel to withdraw to its 1967 borders and share Jerusalem in exchange for full recognition and normalized relations with the Muslim world.

Arab governments will now be unable to sell the deal as they face a storm of criticism from their own people over their powerlessness to help the Palestinians of Gaza.

Egypt, in particular, is being widely accused of collaborating with Israel in further sealing off and isolating Gaza. It seems highly unlikely they will be able to advance a peace plan with Israel for now.

This is a bonus for right-wing Israelis, who have always been dead set against any withdrawal and strongly supported the attack on Gaza.

Other Israeli factions who were always lukewarm about the Saudi peace plan are now unlikely to reconsider it.

Israel’s security establishment is committed to preventing the creation of a viable Palestinian state, and refuses to negotiate with Hamas. Unable to kill all of Hamas’ men, Israel is slowly destroying Gaza’s infrastructure around them, as it did to Yasser Arafat’s PLO.

Israel’s hardliners point to Gaza and claim that any Palestinian state on the West Bank would threaten their nation’s security by firing rockets into Israel’s heartland.

Mighty information machine

Israel is confident that its mighty information machine will allow it to weather the storm of worldwide outrage over its Biblical punishment of Gaza. Who remembers Israel’s flattening of parts of the Palestinian city of Jenin, or the US destruction in Falluja, Iraq, or the Sabra and Shatilla massacres in Beirut?

The US media has focused on the rockets being fired on Israel from Gaza.

Though the torment of Gaza is seen across the horrified Muslim world as a modern version of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising by Jews against the Nazis during World War Two, Western governments still appear bent on taking no action.

Though Israel’s use of American weapons against Gaza violates the US Arms Export Control and Foreign Assistance Acts, the docile US Congress will remain mute.

Israel’s assault on Gaza was clearly timed for America’s interregnum between administrations and the year-end holidays, a well-used Israeli tactic.

Hamas refuses to recognize Israel as long as Israel refuses to recognize Hamas and the rights of millions of homeless Palestinian refugees.

It calls for a non-religious state to be created in Palestine, meaning an end to Zionism. Ironically, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the founder and late leader of Hamas, had spoken of a compromise with Tel Aviv shortly before he was assassinated by Israel in 2004.

An inherited mess

Israel’s hopes that it can bomb Gazans into rejecting Hamas are as ill-conceived as its failed attempt in 2006 to blast Lebanon into rejecting Hezbollah.

The Fatah regime on the West Bank installed by the US and Israel after Yasser Arafat’s suspicious death will be further discredited, leaving the militants of Hamas as the sole authentic voice of Palestinian nationalism.

Hamas, the militant but still democratically elected government of Gaza, is even less likely to compromise.

The Muslim world is in a rage. But so what? Stalin liked to say “the dogs bark, and the caravan moves on,” and as long as the US gives Israel carte blanche, it can do just about anything it wants.

The tragedy of Palestine will thus continue to poison US relations with the Muslim world.

Those Americans who still do not understand why their nation was attacked on 9/11 need only look to Gaza, for which the US is now being blamed as much as Israel.

Unless Israel can make 5 to 7 million Palestinians disappear, it must find some way to coexist with them. Israeli leaders on the center and right continue to avoid facing this fact.

The brutal collective punishment inflicted on Gaza will likely strengthen Hamas and reverse any hopes of a Middle East peace in the coming years.

blueeyeddude's photo
Mon 01/05/09 07:25 AM
just wondering why do you call yourself warmachine?

you come across well read, with some well written statements, why the name?

warmachine's photo
Mon 01/05/09 07:30 AM
Ah, the name. Well, it came about because I needed a "stage" name when I wrestled. Due to that and my tendency to listen to KISS, whose song by the same name I used while destroying my body for 30 bucks after driving 100 miles to and from,is in fact my favorite song by that band!

I started using it online, because it seems like a interesting overlay, being an antiwar, proliberty person with the nick Warmachine.


Also, I tend to get into debate "wars" all the time, so it works out in the end.


drinker

Fanta46's photo
Mon 01/05/09 08:37 AM
Good read war!drinker

blueeyeddude's photo
Mon 01/05/09 08:49 AM
I must admit that your reasoning in sound, I was glad to read that it wasnt what I thought It might be.

Kiss is a great band, a agree...

keep up the work, I enjoy the reads

Winx's photo
Mon 01/05/09 09:13 AM
Thanks, War. It sure is a mess.

I don't envy Obama. He's getting more put on his plate when he already had too much.

Fanta46's photo
Mon 01/05/09 09:17 AM
Yes Eric Margolis has some interesting ideas and observances.
I have heard him on NPR a time or two.

warmachine's photo
Mon 01/05/09 09:21 AM
I really agreed with this article, it seems like we have a bunch of hand wringing ninnies, who can't... or won't stand up and tell the friggin' truth.

Except Dr. Paul. I've never seen him beat around the Bush...

Fanta46's photo
Mon 01/05/09 09:23 AM

I really agreed with this article, it seems like we have a bunch of hand wringing ninnies, who can't... or won't stand up and tell the friggin' truth.

Except Dr. Paul. I've never seen him beat around the Bush...



laugh laugh laugh laugh drinker

warmachine's photo
Mon 01/05/09 09:34 AM
smokin


I'd like to have Dr.Paul show me all the corrupt people in Washington, that way I can choke them out.

~Chuck Norris

Redykeulous's photo
Mon 01/05/09 06:57 PM
This country, the U.S., invented the "war on terrorism". The American people bought it and what they paid for was the right of this government to create a police state. What they paid for was a war. How they continue pay for this war is with lives and dollars that can not even begin to cover the expenses, and nothing can lend validation to the lives that are lost.

The terrorism that America bought was the result of a "so-called" terrorist attack. The circumstances surrounding that attack has never made sense and there has been no voice loud enough or persistant enough to rectify that issue. Instead this so-called "terrorist attact" resulted in the deaths of some 70 Americans who became the martyrs for a cause that was a lie.

We went to fight the "terrorists" spending billions upon billions, and agreeing to loosing the lifes of more Americans, as we agreed to give up more of our freedom. WE have not been unlike the terrorists that are declared so in the OP. We are the reason so many civilians lost their lives in this "war on terrorism".

Meanwhile:

Cardiovascular Disease Statistics

Estimates for the year 2005 are that 80,700,000 people in the United States have one or more forms of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Heart disease is the leading cause of death for both women and men in the United States.
Estimates for the year 2005 are that 80,700,000 people in the United States have one or more forms of cardiovascular disease (CVD).


The United States is considered to be one of the richest countries in the world and yet,
Thirty-three million people including 13 million children live in households that experience hunger or the risk of hunger. This represents one in ten households in the United States.

The cumulative estimated number of cases of AIDS through 2006 in the United States and dependent areas was 1,014,797. Of these, 982,498 were in the 50 states and the District of Columbia and 31,217 were in the dependent areas. In the 50 states and the District of Columbia, adult and adolescent AIDS cases totaled 973,352 with 783,786 cases in males and 189,566 cases in females, and 9,144 cases estimated in children under age 13 years.

Even more mind boggling are the statistics World Wide.

According to UNICEF, 26,500-30,000 children die each day due to poverty.

Less than one per cent of what the world spent every year on weapons was needed to put every child into school by the year 2000 and yet it didn’t happen.

Infectious diseases continue to blight the lives of the poor across the world. An estimated 40 million people are living with HIV/AIDS, with 3 million deaths in 2004. Every year there are 350–500 million cases of malaria, with 1 million fatalities: Africa accounts for 90 percent of malarial deaths and African children account for over 80 percent of malaria victims worldwide.


In 2006, 4.3 million people become infected with HIV and 2.9 million people died of AIDS.

So lets talk about terrorism, and how important it was and is to wage a war costing billions becasue 70 Americans died from an undetermined disaster.....

karmafury's photo
Mon 01/05/09 07:23 PM
Edited by karmafury on Mon 01/05/09 07:26 PM
This country, the U.S., invented the "war on terrorism".


rofl rofl rofl


Because an American President uses the term does not mean that Americans 'invented' the war on terror.

Try telling that to members of GSG-9, the SAS, SBS or any of the others involved in Counter Terrorist Operations long before Bush came out with it.




However back to OP.

There will always be two sides. The only one that matters in the end is the version told by the victor. That's the one that goes down in the history books.