It's not so much a judgement as it is an observation of "it is what it is". If someone puts out a certain image, they're only labelling themselves. Nobody has to do it FOR them. It's called TRUTH, and too many people are afraid of it.

i agree with this.
its not about judging them. or condeming them.
its jsut about seeking to understand a person's personality and why they do the things they do.

society is full of mentally ill, criminals, idiots, biotches, etc etc etc

That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever!

Ive called my son a wigga........he is a white person trying to be black.......thus a wigga!!!

If you decide how a certain group of people are supposed to act, in this case white people who "act black," you are labelling them, because you have decided how they should behave based on what they look like. It's not about TRUTH, it's about IGNORANCE, because only an ignorant person would ever assume that the color of someone's skin has anything to do with their behavior. If you believe it does then you are a racist.

Wrong. Think again. If someone decides for themselves that they want to look like/act like a punk, then they will be viewed as such. They have nobody to blame but themselves if somebody makes that judgement about them, for this is what they themselves have chosen for society to perceive them as. It's a case of "where there's smoke, there's fire".

Personal accountability!

LOL, I must say this has become the stupidest thread I've seen on here and that's saying alot. We are not discussing "punks, mentally ill people, and *****es" we are discussing people with different skin colors. Punks, mentally ill people and *****es are an attitude, condition or behavior, NOT a skin color.

You don't choose to be black, asian, white, native american, etc. you are born to that. You choose to identify as a punk or ***** or whatever. Being black or white or whatever is not a freaking behavior, it is your ethnicity, it is society who has chosen to decide what "being black" is.

Even your addition of the mentally ill is inaccurate because no one chooses mental illness either. "Acting white" and "acting black" are ignorant, archaic terms. It's 2008 people, no one "acts black" or "acts white" anymore. You even have a president who is half black and half white, if he uses ebonics will you call him a wigger? If he speaks proper english, is he acting white? Think about that.

I'm abandoning this thread, you can continue to fight amongst yourself and pass your racist, uninformed rhetoric back and forth, but I choose not to read it. Hmmm, I wonder if that was "black" enough?

P.S. To the original poster, I don't attend church, therefore I have no pastor, and it's "good Christians" like you who are the reason why I don't go.

Wigger...is the combination of two words.

One being white...and the other...nigger...hence wigger.

I hate that word...i hate anything to do with that word. And the term wigger, invloves that term, so to me, its still has racist vibes and can be very prejudice.

Don't hate on the mentally ill, its not our fault

Anyway, people will call you whatever they want, whether you like it or not. I have a mohawk, dress in jeans and a black shirt and leather jacket and often i'm called a punk, anarchist, devil worshiper, etc in public. If i cared what others thought of me, than i would shave my mohawk off and wear nice clothes, but since i don't i'm a proud punk =D

Oh, and if i did shave my head, i would be called a skin head, racist, KKK member, etc. Theres no way to win O_O

child molestors.

does conviction of the crime mean i can "label" somebody.

we all put on false personas.

also i think its funny b/c calling ppl racist...is inherently racist