100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: A Sad Time for our Country... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Where did I say anything about when life begins? Is a Embryo / Fetus alive? If it's living, what is it...human? And what do you call it when you kill a human who isn't an immediate threat to your life and is innocent of any crime? The law calls that murder. Please read my original post. I am not here arguing about abortions. He didn't vote for that because the wording wasn't right. He is not "for" abortions. Nobody is. He wants to cut down on the number of unwanted pregnancies so there will be less abortions. If the Embryo / Fetus is a living human, then Obama is for the murder of certain humans. I'm going by what you have said about Obama's position. How did you get that from what I said? 
He has said that he is personally not for abortions. He wants to have sex education and decrease the amount of unwanted pregnancies. That would be like saying "I know it's wrong to lynch black people, so I am going to focus on making sure fewer black people are born, so that they cannot be lynched." Simply changing a couple words in his argument makes the stupidity of it appearant. Abortion is right or wrong. A embryo / fetus is either a human or it isn't. If a building is about to be demolished, we would have to know if there were any people inside or not, right? If a embryo is going to be killed, we should be certain of if it's a human or not, right? Shouldn't the default position be to allow it to live until such a time as we can determine when human life begins? Soo.. you're against trying to decrease the amount of unwanted pregnancies with sex education. That's like saying "It's wrong to kill babies, but I don't want to stop it". That position makes no sense. If abortion is wrong, it's wrong. If it's right, it's right. There is no "maybe" when a human life might be involved. You do realize that I'm talking about sex education, don't you? it is wrong to do a lot of things is making it illegal going to stop it --- no he realizes whether he likes it or not at this time it is the law of the land the law of the land is what he is supposed to protect till such time it is overturned if he does not like said law due to his religious background he must still abide by said law but his not liking the situation is cause to try and make the law of the land less obvious by educating those that are most likely to need the law in the first place in doing this he maintains his (moral obligation to his church without it interfering with his civic duty as a public servant) just a thought but hey what do i know |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, let's go with Mars and revisit Roe v Wade.
Take away the choice of women and let them mutilate themselves and die out of desperation. Yes, let's mix Church and State and let legislation play God. Oh good grief Mars....you obviously got hung up with a group on campus. Take a few years to grow up and realize that the soap box is no longer an effective measure of free speech. 
|
|
|
|
|
