Topic: Don't believe that OBAMA will raise your taxes! | |
---|---|
Isnt obamas tax plan the one that will tax the rich higher and give a tax break to working families? How could anyone be against that?
|
|
|
|
quote...Man, I'd like to see what your budget at home looks like if you feel that way and conduct your affairs that way. Because if you do, that makes you part of the problem.
ok...house...paid for in full Three vehicles...paid for in full plasma tv....paid cash $55k worth of tools....paid for in full have paid cash for everything for about 25 years monthly budget...$42 cell phone, $56 internet, $38 electricity, fuel to get to work...$210/month groceries...$160/mo, meals out when I am too lazy to cook....$90/mo. savings for stuff I want to buy when I have the CASH on hand...$450. Cigarettes....$160. Charitable donations...$160/mo. disposable income after all those expenses...no bodies business but mine...lol...but it is sufficient. sometimes I wonder if I am being cheap instead of frugal...lol |
|
|
|
Isnt obamas tax plan the one that will tax the rich higher and give a tax break to working families? How could anyone be against that? that is what I mean by regulated income...the classic strategy at election time of class warfare. A point to remember...if there is no chance for absolute failure, there is also no chance for blinding success. Legislating equality in income via taxes is a mechanism for insuring that there is no reward for risk-taking and innovation. |
|
|
|
the downturn is due to a tight credit market. It is caused by, actually, all the idiots who lived on their credit cards and borrowed money that they could not pay back are the cause of the current financial turndown. anyone who is so stupid to get that deeply in debt, or get a mortgage that there was no way in heck that they could pay back displays their true inteligence....approximately that of a knat....and they will all vote dem in the hopes that the govt will bail their sorry butts out. Add deregulation to that. |
|
|
|
Edited by
madisonman
on
Mon 10/06/08 07:19 PM
|
|
Isnt obamas tax plan the one that will tax the rich higher and give a tax break to working families? How could anyone be against that? that is what I mean by regulated income...the classic strategy at election time of class warfare. A point to remember...if there is no chance for absolute failure, there is also no chance for blinding success. Legislating equality in income via taxes is a mechanism for insuring that there is no reward for risk-taking and innovation. |
|
|
|
it doesn't matter who get's elected taxes will be raised to pay off some of this 10 trillion debt that Bush has made Yes it was all Bush, the House and Senate didn't approve anything. The three branch system is a conspiracy. We are really living under a dictatorship. |
|
|
|
Yep, the republicans "no tax and spend anyway" has worked out great. Dude, seriously....the person you are rooting for has an even more aggressive spending attitude than Bush did... Seriously, both these candidates just want to fuel the fire that's burn down our country... |
|
|
|
Isnt obamas tax plan the one that will tax the rich higher and give a tax break to working families? How could anyone be against that? Gonna raise my hand on that. All you gotta do is look beyond the surface of the to realize its a bad idea right now... Loot at all his plans, then look at it. He can't pay for his spending... |
|
|
|
Yep, the republicans "no tax and spend anyway" has worked out great. No tax? So then who is stealing 30% of my income? |
|
|
|
Isnt obamas tax plan the one that will tax the rich higher and give a tax break to working families? How could anyone be against that? Uh people that dont think that just because you are successful means you should pay a higher percentage. I support flat tax thank you. |
|
|
|
it doesn't matter who get's elected taxes will be raised to pay off some of this 10 trillion debt that Bush has made Yes it was all Bush, the House and Senate didn't approve anything. The three branch system is a conspiracy. We are really living under a dictatorship. Amen People really need to be researching, writing letters to, and voting for their own local candidates. Presidential elections are just a distraction. The electoral college chooses the president. People choose the electoral college. Why dont we do our jobs? |
|
|
|
it doesn't matter who get's elected taxes will be raised to pay off some of this 10 trillion debt that Bush has made Yes it was all Bush, the House and Senate didn't approve anything. The three branch system is a conspiracy. We are really living under a dictatorship. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Mon 10/06/08 07:43 PM
|
|
Yep, the republicans "no tax and spend anyway" has worked out great. No tax? So then who is stealing 30% of my income? They didn't raise taxes to obtain monies for the Stimulus checks. They borrowed it from China and other countries instead. That means "no tax and spend anyway" to me. |
|
|
|
it doesn't matter who get's elected taxes will be raised to pay off some of this 10 trillion debt that Bush has made Yes it was all Bush, the House and Senate didn't approve anything. The three branch system is a conspiracy. We are really living under a dictatorship. And that has nothing to do with Bush. Repubs had the senate when Clinton was president too. The Dems have had it now and no improvement. In fact gas prices spiked after they took over. |
|
|
|
Yep, the republicans "no tax and spend anyway" has worked out great. No tax? So then who is stealing 30% of my income? They didn't raise taxes to obtain monies for the Stimulus checks. They borrowed it from China and other countries instead. That means "no tax and spend anyway" to me. Well having 30% of my income taken by the government = tax. |
|
|
|
See the Shadow market report from 60 minutes.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4502673n |
|
|
|
Isnt obamas tax plan the one that will tax the rich higher and give a tax break to working families? How could anyone be against that? Uh people that dont think that just because you are successful means you should pay a higher percentage. I support flat tax thank you. Flat tax is a great idea. Cheers to that Oh, i got an idea, why don't we pull our troops out of everywhere, use them to secure our borders, do away with homeland security (cuz hey our military is back), and stop giving tax breaks to companies that outsource. Lets see....that alone just saved us over a trillion dollars a year... What should we do with that??? (Would be nice to pay off the deficit huh?) Then we could start backing our dollar again and watch its value grow (federal reserve has got to go, or at least be audited). That would save our economy (eventually), our medical crisis, and our fuel crisis... |
|
|
|
Yep, the republicans "no tax and spend anyway" has worked out great. Dude, seriously....the person you are rooting for has an even more aggressive spending attitude than Bush did... Seriously, both these candidates just want to fuel the fire that's burn down our country... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Mon 10/06/08 07:49 PM
|
|
it doesn't matter who get's elected taxes will be raised to pay off some of this 10 trillion debt that Bush has made Yes it was all Bush, the House and Senate didn't approve anything. The three branch system is a conspiracy. We are really living under a dictatorship. And that has nothing to do with Bush. Repubs had the senate when Clinton was president too. The Dems have had it now and no improvement. In fact gas prices spiked after they took over. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Mon 10/06/08 07:48 PM
|
|
Yep, the republicans "no tax and spend anyway" has worked out great. No tax? So then who is stealing 30% of my income? They didn't raise taxes to obtain monies for the Stimulus checks. They borrowed it from China and other countries instead. That means "no tax and spend anyway" to me. Well having 30% of my income taken by the government = tax. It wasn't raised to do that spending. And with that and the bail out, we have debts to pay. Taxes will be raised to pay that off. |
|
|