Topic: My husband... | |
---|---|
one of my favorite quotes is " truth is constructed" and " what you say depends upon where you stand" I have no problem with spider's statement, his statement is to merely attest to the fact that he understands that everyone in this chat has different God(s) or may not have one at all, but that to him his God is what he believes in and when he gives his opinion it is his "truth" that he is presenting... Maybe i have it wrong what he meant but I see no fault in his example I actually think it is a good one that most people can understand. Perhaps they are two very different subjects, the point of the religious thread in my opinion isn't to form a group of the christians, and non believers which is what has seemed to happen and therefore when everone one post a rebuttle from the other party is immediately entered! the point is to acknowledge the differences but to talk about them to come to a better understand of each other. |
|
|
|
good grief!
|
|
|
|
Spider, its not a flawless analogy..but like the adoring wife in your story, you are just as blind to the insults you toss at those around you while you profess your loving devotion to your god... its ok to love your god, justkeep it to yourself,I dont care and dont want to know about it... just like the wife should have respectfully kept her opinions to herself.... symbelmyne, You do realize that this forum is for discussing religion, right? I'm simply suggesting that instead of insulting each other's beliefs, we could all just talk about how we feel about our own beliefs. I mean, I could run from thread to thread accusing everyone of being a Satanist and quoting verses about how sinners will be punished and calling everyone a fool and quoting proverbs. I really can do that, I can do that all day. I can talk about lepers and damnation and curses and all kinds of great stuff. Or I can just say that your beliefs are stupid and anyone who believes them must be stupid. Oh, I could do that all day and it would accomplish nothing but piss people off and annoy the moderators and admins with all of the emails and reports they would get. Do you get the point? Can't we all just agree to respectfully ask questions to one another and speak in glowing terms about the truth we find in our beliefs? What is accomplished by a post insulting Christians or Muslims or Jews? You claim to be a Jew, didn't you know that Jews aren't supposed to insult the beliefs of others? Jews are told to respect the non-Jews, but never deny their own beliefs? Why are you challenging me on this, when it's what has been practiced by Jews for the past 3300 years? |
|
|
|
How does one get a restraining order against a god? geez Spidercmb was Jane's husband actually God in your example of was you using an analogy? ..if you was using an analogy then wouldn't the restraining order also be an analogy since Jane's husband wasn't actually God ...you have become confused by your own question ...again that is why you shouldn't use human examples to compare what God supposely does Okay, the restraining order is an analogy...I get that. WHAT DOES IT STAND FOR? The wife is the believers, the husband is the god or belief, so WTF is the restraining order? In an analogy, each piece mentioned should correspond to another concept or idea. You can't just go throwing stuff into an analogy, because you think it would be fun. ok..to not make things more complicated so that you can clearly understand we will use the "Christian" concept of God DISCLAIMER: I {funches} are only using the christian god so "Spidercmb" can clearly understand the concept so the moderators won't delete it or send me e-mail ..I get more e-mail from them than from the mutual matches ok "Spidercmb" since Jane's Husband is God..he will threaten and promise the other women that he will burn them in his open pit bar-b-q if they do not worship or submit to him ...the other women may think he is insane and delusional and may be scared of being harmed by him so they make take out a restraining order against Jane's Husband |
|
|
|
How does one get a restraining order against a god? geez Spidercmb was Jane's husband actually God in your example of was you using an analogy? ..if you was using an analogy then wouldn't the restraining order also be an analogy since Jane's husband wasn't actually God ...you have become confused by your own question ...again that is why you shouldn't use human examples to compare what God supposely does Okay, the restraining order is an analogy...I get that. WHAT DOES IT STAND FOR? The wife is the believers, the husband is the god or belief, so WTF is the restraining order? In an analogy, each piece mentioned should correspond to another concept or idea. You can't just go throwing stuff into an analogy, because you think it would be fun. ok..to not make things more complicated so that you can clearly understand we will use the "Christian" concept of God DISCLAIMER: I {funches} are only using the christian god so "Spidercmb" can clearly understand the concept so the moderators won't delete it or send me e-mail ..I get more e-mail from them than from the mutual matches ok "Spidercmb" since Jane's Husband is God..he will threaten and promise the other women that he will burn them in his open pit bar-b-q if they do not worship or submit to him ...the other women may think he is insane and delusional and may be scared of being harmed by him so they make take out a restraining order against Jane's Husband I know what a restraining order is. I know why someone would get one. What does the restraining order stand for in this analogy? Why do you insist on saying that God plans to torture people who the Bible says the opposite? I'm very confused by you. You put items into analogies that have no analog and you repeat incorrect statements about Christianity. |
|
|
|
Spider, you take everything way too personal.
I couldn't care less what you personally believe. I speak to the issue of organized religions and their doctrines. If it bothers you on a personal level to discuss religious issues generically you'd do yourself a huge favor by simply not participating on religious discussion forums. That's a personal choice on your part. You're totally out of line trying to claim personal foul and insult every time other people explain why they don't buy into the idea that a particular doctrine is the word of God. If people had to refrain from doing that because it would be considered to be "insulting" then we'd no longer have freedom of speech. And your so-called "analogy" isn't even close to being an analogy for the reason that Funches gave. You are more than welcome to praise Jesus until the cows come home. When you cross the line is when you tell me that I'm lost without him, or that I'm somehow in defiance of God for not believing like you do. So Funches is perfectly correct. You're so-called "analogy" is no analogy at all because the woman isn't proclaiming that everyone else has to marry her husband or face the wrath of God. You're just trying to make out like everyone who doesn't agree with you is a big bully and they are just mean hateful people. Nothing could be further from the truth. |
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Wed 07/23/08 10:08 AM
|
|
A group of women are sitting around and discussing life in general. Jane says "I don't know what I would do without my husband, he is the sweetest, kindest, most generous man I know." How should the other women react? Has Jane insulted all of the other women's husbands? No, she has simply stated what she believes about her husband. She obviously loves her husband and was talking about her love for him. In the same way, believers speak of their religions. Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Shiks and yes, Christians all love their religion and speak of it as being the truth. This isn't an insult to any other religion, because the members of those religions all feel the same way about their own. If a Muslim didn't believe his religion was the truth, then why be a Muslim? Loving your religion and speaking about your beliefs and religion with glowing terms, even calling it the worlds only truth is not insulting to those who love their own beliefs. That poor woman is miserably and desperately co-dependent, and sadly submissive. Those conditions are common in our modern societies, and are considered normal, but are nonetheless mild to serious delusional mental disorders. The relationship is decidedly unhealthy, and if she were in my circle of friends, I would uncompromisingly and compassionaltely suggest and support her to snap-out of this state of regression, and restore wholeness of her own self, ... and reconquer sovereignty over her life. Abdication of 'self', and substitution of such with some unhealthy compulsive 'dependent compensation', is never good news, and is never 'true'. NEVER MIND EVER FINDING THE TRUTH IN SUCH DESPERATE QUEST! We've got to support a person in such a state to restore balance in 'self', and get back to a mentally sain perspective of life. DISLAIMER: This is my personnal observation of the OP 'analogy'. It doesn't constitute, neither should be perceived as an insult, personnal attack, editoprial comment on one's personnal choce of beliefs, or religious convictions. Anyone feeling they might be personnally targeted by the comment above is sikmply and categorically mistaken, and this poster will not entertain their delusion in any way shape or form. With all due respect. |
|
|
|
And your so-called "analogy" isn't even close to being an analogy for the reason that Funches gave. So you understood Funches analogy? Could you explain what the "restraining order" is? What is the analog of the restraining order? Wife = believers Husband = god or belief restraining order = ??? |
|
|
|
A group of women are sitting around and discussing life in general. Jane says "I don't know what I would do without my husband, he is the sweetest, kindest, most generous man I know." How should the other women react? Has Jane insulted all of the other women's husbands? No, she has simply stated what she believes about her husband. She obviously loves her husband and was talking about her love for him. In the same way, believers speak of their religions. Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Shiks and yes, Christians all love their religion and speak of it as being the truth. This isn't an insult to any other religion, because the members of those religions all feel the same way about their own. If a Muslim didn't believe his religion was the truth, then why be a Muslim? Loving your religion and speaking about your beliefs and religion with glowing terms, even calling it the worlds only truth is not insulting to those who love their own beliefs. That poor woman is miserably and desperately co-dependent, and sadly submissive. Those conditions are common in our modern societies, and are considered normal, but are nonetheless mild to serious delusional mental disorders. The relationship is decidedly unhealthy, and if she were in my circle of friends, I would uncompromisingly and compassionaltely suggest and support her to snap-out of this state of regression, and restore wholeness of her own self, ... and reconquer sovereignty over her life. Abdication of 'self', and substitution of such with some unhealthy compulsive 'dependent compensation', is never good news, and is never 'true'. NEVER MIND EVER FINDING THE TRUTH IN SUCH DESPERATE QUEST! We've got to support a person in such a state to restore balance in 'self', and get back to a mentally sain perspective of life. Thanks for your input. I want to some day find a woman whom I can talk about in such glowing terms and I hope that she can talk about me with the same terms. |
|
|
|
Here are some of my thoughts... http://www.justsayhi.com/topic/show/148239
|
|
|
|
I know what a restraining order is. I know why someone would get one. What does the restraining order stand for in this analogy? the restraining order is the analogy for the "Free Will" not to be harassed or tortured by Jane's husband simply because the other women choose not to submit to him Why do you insist on saying that God plans to torture people who the Bible says the opposite? did God create Hell not to torture people? ..or did God create hell to use as a screen saver on his Heaven's computer ..no need to deny the obvious I'm very confused by you. You put items into analogies that have no analog and you repeat incorrect statements about Christianity. "Spidercmb"..it's amazing that you left out what the incorrect statements were..which only means you may be in denial that they are actually correct statements ..feel the "Free Will" to point them out to me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you get the point? Can't we all just agree to respectfully ask questions to one another and speak in glowing terms about the truth we find in our beliefs? "Spidercmb"..may I suggest The Christian Coffeehouse for Chat thread ..there you will find two lovely hostess to greet you and welcome your angelic views... the enchantress "Britty" and "Feralcatlady" or is that pharoahcatlady? anyplace else besides there ..then fudgitatboutit |
|
|
|
Of course you must realize that my beliefs are the only truth in existence in this reality. If you don't come to realize this you will forever be lost in confusion and slavery to a mythical god.
My beliefs are the only perfect ones. They give freedom to all beings and you will come to realize that you are part of the prime source and that you are free from the bondage of sin forever. I believe one day you will all be free from your bondage and the idea of serving in hell or in and heaven for eternity will pass away like all other myths. May the force be with you and may you learn to use it. JB |
|
|
|
A group of women are sitting around and discussing life in general. Jane says "I don't know what I would do without my husband, he is the sweetest, kindest, most generous man I know. How should the other women react? Has Jane insulted all of the other women's husbands? No, she has simply stated what she believes about her husband. She obviously loves her husband and was talking about her love for him. In the same way, believers speak of their religions. Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Shiks and yes, Christians all love their religion and speak of it as being the truth. This isn't an insult to any other religion, because the members of those religions all feel the same way about their own. If a Muslim didn't believe his religion was the truth, then why be a Muslim? Loving your religion and speaking about your beliefs and religion with glowing terms, even calling it the worlds only truth is not insulting to those who love their own beliefs. indeed all you write sounds as sweet and eloquent, and perhaps at first glance as truth, but there is one part that be the most truth that has been left out.......... if jane say to all others that her husband is good, and loving, and the sweetest in the world, and generous, and others do not believe, then jane smile with content, as what other could ever know since they have not lived with her husband.......... but, if jane gets mad, and offended, and even accuse all others as ignorant, and then blind, and then jane even begins to feel that others that do not SEE are blinded, and even call all that do not believe unbelievers, and pray for the saving of others, and call all others as LOST, and then even proclaim when this does not work, that all others will surely perish in hell, for not seeing her truths....... this be a jane that any wise man would run from forever until no breath was left, as this women surely believes that love is PLEASING HER............ all evidence then shows this jane could be recieving such good things from her own husband, but indeed it is noticed what you percieve your god or good husband to be, as there is no mention of wisdom, or truth, which be the greatest gift to any, and the only asset to any man, that crerate all the rest sought..... what christian seeks generosity for themself, or anything else for that matter........ the story you tell would now be more complete, and it's attempt to justify the self-righteouss distain of christinas of others, as the intentions here are easily seen....... those proclaiming to be christians with their mouth, indeed if they were, no such words would EVER utter from their mouth, as it was said within their own text that to find the truth was as a gift, like winning the lottery, and who that wins the lottery has anything bad to say about anthter who has not..........please many will come and say we are christians, we know the truth, but these hear only what the mind seek the greatest, and deny all their own heart constantly whispers to themself, and why constant affirmation is needed, and why each run to hide themselves with white garmets, and these have been coined even as foolish virgins, that heed not their own hearts whisperings............peace |
|
|
|
awh......funches points out more truth about christianity than most that call themself christians, and he does not speak anything that is offensive to anyone that knows the truth, that all words are to worshipped and inspected, not discarded as ruble and trash to a mind that seeks most to hear praises.............
when the truth of the questions funches poses are answered, then more answers will be had by the wolves in sheeps clothing, that rip and tear with their words each one that attempts to answer the very questions the bible was written to inspire, and to bring forth to FREE...... every scripture written is merely a question, to make one have to find the true "wise" answer............. fear will NEVER do this, nor even attempt to, and only seek comfort in following to appease fear, but indeed warriors of truth will NEVER be satisfied with a mouth full of regurgetated words as vomit for answers........ |
|
|
|
but, if jane gets mad, and offended, and even accuse all others as ignorant, and then blind, and then jane even begins to feel that others that do not SEE are blinded, and even call all that do not believe unbelievers, and pray for the saving of others, and call all others as LOST, and then even proclaim when this does not work, that all others will surely perish in hell, for not seeing her truths....... You aren't any better with analogy's than Funches. You got the message, it rang with truth and yet you still seek to disprove it. That's what you need to worry about, instead of trying to find a way to twist the analogy into falsehood. |
|
|
|
I know what a restraining order is. I know why someone would get one. What does the restraining order stand for in this analogy? the restraining order is the analogy for the "Free Will" not to be harassed or tortured by Jane's husband simply because the other women choose not to submit to him Awesome, thanks for explaining. But the analogy is faulty. Free will gives one the ability to choose what one believes, it does not make your beliefs real. So if you use your free will to worship Ba'al, that doesn't exempt you from your sins. It doesn't wash away your sins. It doesn't prevent the true God from judging you. Why do you insist on saying that God plans to torture people who the Bible says the opposite? did God create Hell not to torture people? ..or did God create hell to use as a screen saver on his Heaven's computer ..no need to deny the obvious No, God did not. Jesus said so explicitly. Matthew 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: I'm very confused by you. You put items into analogies that have no analog and you repeat incorrect statements about Christianity. "Spidercmb"..it's amazing that you left out what the incorrect statements were..which only means you may be in denial that they are actually correct statements ..feel the "Free Will" to point them out to me For those who were following, I challenged your incorrect description of hell and it's purpose. |
|
|
|
A group of women are sitting around and discussing life in general. Jane says "I don't know what I would do without my husband, he is the sweetest, kindest, most generous man I know." If we are using the analogy that Jane is a Muslim. (as opposed to a christian) How should the other women react? Has Jane insulted all of the other women's husbands? No, she has simply stated what she believes about her husband. She obviously loves her husband and was talking about her love for him. The other women would react with disdain. Jane's husband is not forgiving, he is a bully and he is a misogynist. No, she has not insulted other wives husbands as she blindly concerned with feeding her husband's ego so that he will feel great, even though it is as the expense of her own self-esteem and freedoms. Christians all love their religion and speak of it as being the truth. This isn't an insult to any other religion, because the members of those religions all feel the same way about their own.
Christians dont all love their religion. Catholics, for example, are consumed with guilt for everything that they do incorrectly in their lives, so much so that it forces them to seek forgiveness and confess. I was christened. I had no choice. I was an infant. I disowned all religion. You dont "love" christianity, it is used as an emotional crutch when you want to talk to yourself. If a Muslim didn't believe his religion was the truth, then why be a Muslim? because it is asked for in the majority of paperwork, and because he wants to feel part of a group.
Humanity is afraid of being an outsider and if you are afraid of being abnormal, you will conform, or you will have been indoctrinated to believe. |
|
|