nonsense i say

he's NOT bisexual

Be nice, don't judge.. we are not the person who does the judging.

In my opinion, I won't share any man with any woman, period! And as far as being Gay/Bisexual..to each their own. It's not for me. That doesn't mean they aren't a good person.

The guy NEVER said he was bisexual Read his profile He said that he isnot bisexual

smile: What are you talking about? He isnt bi-sexual and if he was your comments would still be wrong

good greif! where did this me as a bisexual thing come from? i said....WE ARE NOT LOOKING FOR A BISEXUAL! NEITHER OF US ARE BI. BOTH OF US ARE STRAIGHT! GOT THAT STRAIGHT NOW? some people need to learn how to read before they make comments. some of you are good at reading the profile and made no mistakes at all. i think some people read what they want to hear, not what is written.

so......there is nothing bisexual about this profile ladies and gentlemen....AND I DO MEAN NOTHING

but i think their real question is....would you!

*snicker*

What I'm about to say is based on what I have read.

So what you're saying is that you want another woman to join your marriage, it isn't sexual, and you want them to help you reach goals that cannot be achieved with just two people? And neither of you are bi-sexual..

It sounds like to me you want a sugar momma. Correct me if I'm wrong. But that just seems wrong to use and abuse woman like that.

Plural relationships will never work out because of the jealousy factor. One woman may think you love the other more and this would lead to competition and many, many, arguments..

who is judging anyone?
I was expressing my thoughts about why a plural relationship is not for me.

maybe i can explain it like this.
say a guy is married. they do all the normal stuff that married couples do.
end of story #1

say a guy is married to a second woman. those two do all the normal stuff that married couples do
end of story #2

say a guy is married to both of these women and all three live in the same home. the man and woman #1 and woman #2 share all the responsibilities of home life. the guy is a husband to both of them.one legal, one non-legal (no signing of papers) the two women would be like sisters.
thus the term "sisterwife" was adopted. no, the three don't have sex together, no the two women don't have sex together, yes, the man does have sex with both women, but only with one at a time.
end of story #3

this is in no way any new idea. this is as old as the hills. but if two women are willing to share one man, or two men are willing to share one woman, then there are three people (instead of two) forming a loving, committed, relationship of working and having fun together making it less expensive to live and less expensive to play on time off. 2 women (if they are willing to share and do not have a jealousy hangup) can both have a committed relationship with all the perks and benifits of being in a good marriage.
lets face it, jealousy is no more than being insecure with yourself. you can have that kind of problem and be in a one on one relationship and it can still cause you and your mate problems. it would take a non-jealous, sharing woman to fit this lifestyle. maybe she would have to be an ex-mormon? i don't know?

I have one word for this *gag*

no one said it's for everyone, neither is being gay or lesbian or being a priest.
to each their own, just as you have your own thing that you want. be nice and maybe someone will be nice to you in return. it's easier to catch bees with honey than it is to try to catch them with vinager.

To each his own but sooooo not for me. Mama didn't teach me how to share as a child.

One at a time was enough good grief Id have myself commited if i would have had to deal with 2