Previous 1
Topic: Sen. John McCain, Cindy McCain and the arrogance of priviled
mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 02:41 PM
Edited by mnhiker on Mon 06/30/08 02:44 PM
The arrogance of priviledge.

The McCains seem to have forgotten to pay taxes on their houses for the last 4 years.

What do you think would happen to you if you let your home taxes slide for 4 years?

But the McCains are not like you.

Cindy McCain is loaded, so why didn't they pay their taxes?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/28/mccains-failed-to-pay-tax_n_109785.html

boredinaz06's photo
Mon 06/30/08 02:44 PM



Oh Yeah! Huffington, Shes not liberal or anything!

Johncenawlife316's photo
Mon 06/30/08 02:47 PM
They should both be homeless by now,kicked out etc. I'm sorry I don't care if your running for office or not, or if your in some other type of office.. pay the taxes. mad

boredinaz06's photo
Mon 06/30/08 02:51 PM





if Anna Reported it I would Double Check elsewhere to Verify it. shes most Likely Just saying that to Make Him Look Bad, after all he is Running against Obama.

mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 02:57 PM






if Anna Reported it I would Double Check elsewhere to Verify it. shes most Likely Just saying that to Make Him Look Bad, after all he is Running against Obama.


Ok, why don't you go fact check that and get back to us. grumble

boredinaz06's photo
Mon 06/30/08 03:07 PM







if Anna Reported it I would Double Check elsewhere to Verify it. shes most Likely Just saying that to Make Him Look Bad, after all he is Running against Obama.


Ok, why don't you go fact check that and get back to us. grumble


Cause I Didn't Post this topic! when I Do Post topics I Double Check, Usually with Snopes.

Fanta46's photo
Mon 06/30/08 03:08 PM







if Anna Reported it I would Double Check elsewhere to Verify it. shes most Likely Just saying that to Make Him Look Bad, after all he is Running against Obama.


Ok, why don't you go fact check that and get back to us. grumble



No you didnt!!!!noway noway

mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 03:17 PM








if Anna Reported it I would Double Check elsewhere to Verify it. shes most Likely Just saying that to Make Him Look Bad, after all he is Running against Obama.


Ok, why don't you go fact check that and get back to us. grumble


Cause I Didn't Post this topic! when I Do Post topics I Double Check, Usually with Snopes.


Well I checked with Snopes, isn't listed yet.

That doesn't mean it's not true.

Fanta46's photo
Mon 06/30/08 03:25 PM
Cindy McCain refused to release her Tax records as required by law at first!
She kept claiming she didnt have to that she wasnt running for President, her husband was!!

Personally!
I think having her as a First Lady would be a disgrace!drinker

mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 03:33 PM

Cindy McCain refused to release her Tax records as required by law at first!
She kept claiming she didnt have to that she wasnt running for President, her husband was!!

Personally!
I think having her as a First Lady would be a disgrace!drinker


I guess she had something to hide!

Not surprising, given the number of skeletons in their closets!

madisonman's photo
Mon 06/30/08 03:54 PM




Oh Yeah! Huffington, Shes not liberal or anything!
so did they pay there taxers or not> I dont expect fox news to air the story.

Lindyy's photo
Mon 06/30/08 04:05 PM




Oh Yeah! Huffington, Shes not liberal or anything!


Love it.laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Lindyy
:heart:

madisonman's photo
Mon 06/30/08 04:11 PM
Didnt John mcain abandon his first wife when she became paraplegic or something like that?

mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 06:11 PM

Didnt John mcain abandon his first wife when she became paraplegic or something like that?


She was in a car accident and had serious injuries.

Since she wasn't as sexy to McCain after this, he decided to cheat on her with his future sugar mama. explode

mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 06:15 PM
Meet Cindy McCain:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/cindy.asp

Fanta46's photo
Mon 06/30/08 06:16 PM

Meet Cindy McCain:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/cindy.asp


Monica Lewinsky's role model!!laugh laugh laugh

mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 06:18 PM


Meet Cindy McCain:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/cindy.asp


Monica Lewinsky's role model!!laugh laugh laugh

laugh laugh laugh drinker drinker drinker

Fanta46's photo
Mon 06/30/08 06:22 PM



Meet Cindy McCain:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/cindy.asp


Monica Lewinsky's role model!!laugh laugh laugh

laugh laugh laugh drinker drinker drinker


Republicans are hypocrites!!drinker

mnhiker's photo
Mon 06/30/08 06:36 PM




Meet Cindy McCain:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/cindy.asp


Monica Lewinsky's role model!!laugh laugh laugh

laugh laugh laugh drinker drinker drinker


Republicans are hypocrites!!drinker


Remember how they 'swiftboated' Kerry?

If more revelations come out, there would be no need to 'swiftboat' McCain!

His skeletons are so numerous they are falling out of the closet and killng his campaign! laugh laugh laugh

Fanta46's photo
Mon 06/30/08 06:41 PM
Check this one out about the Republicans favorite Propaganda rally cry!


Desperation and lies!

Bush said: “The people’s trust in their Government is undermined by congressional earmarks — special interest projects that are often snuck in at the last minute, without discussion or debate.”

FACT — BUSH HAS ENGAGED IN HIS OWN EARMARKING: In 2007, Bush stuffed approximately 580 earmarks worth $15.6 billion into his appropriation request for military construction and veterans affairs. Bush’s earmarks included $24 million for the Laura Bush 21st Century Librarian Program and “$8.9 million for the Points of Light foundation, a pet project started by his father, former President George H.W. Bush.” [Washington Examiner, 11/15/07]

FACT — BUSH HAS REPEATEDLY SIGNED PORK-LADEN BILLS INTO LAW: According to the Congressional Research Service, there were 997 earmarks in the Fiscal 2000 defense appropriation bill. By the Fiscal 2005 law that Bush signed into law, there were 2506 earmarks, “more than two and half times the number contained the Fiscal 2000 bill.” In the bill funding the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and Education, the number of earmarks grew from 291 in 2000 to 3,014 in 2005. [Lilly, 1/28/08]

FACT — EARMARKS EXPLODED UNDER THE GOP-CONTROLLED CONGRESS: When Republicans took over Congress in 1994, there were 4,000 earmarks on appropriations bills. At the end of the 109th Congress in 2005, there were 15,000. [Washington Post, 1/25/06; The Gavel, 1/28/08]

FACT — CURRENT 110TH CONGRESS HAS CUT EARMARKS IN HALF: “As promised when they took control of Congress,” in 2007, “House Democratic leaders cut in half from last year the value of earmarks in the bill, as they did in the other 11 agency spending measures.” [New York Times, 11/4/07]
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/28/sotu-federal-earmarks-have-exploded-under-bush-and-gop-led-congress/



:wink:

Previous 1