Topic: Married couple on singles sites | |
---|---|
You'd be amazed at how many men I know that prefer BBW.
But, I don't mean to hijack this thread. Back on topic. |
|
|
|
Well, I'm not married but I have a gf and she's on this site, too. We didn't meet here, but she did use the site as a way of contacting me last November after we had been out of touch for a long time.
There are a lot of people I really like on this site, a lot of people I consider friends, and I really don't see why it should be a problem for me to be here and talk to my friends....! It's true that some people (married or not) could use this site as a way to create some extra-relationashipulist trysts, and that could be bad if someone gets hurt, if there's deception, that sort of thing. I understand that, and I don't condone it. But for me, there's really no danger of that. I've been here a year and a half, and have run into some of the greatest and finest people I have ever had the pleasure to get to know, but I have yet to find anyone who I would consider even remotely (in the sense of trillions of light years) datable. Not gonna happen. So I'm comfortable sticking around for my friends. Besides, some of them liked my book! |
|
|
|
well, the thing is, if you can't be trusted to be on here, you can't be trusted to be left alone anywhere.
Being on JSH is not going to make someone cheat if they weren't already so inclined. |
|
|
|
hello im married and have been for almost 40 years now i enjoy people and find this site is just clean fun for all young older married singel |
|
|
|
Here is the other thing. I haven't found any dates, or had any guys contact me that want to date me, in the entire six months I have been on here. Why would it suddenly become a problem if I got married? It's not like I am online flirting with guys and turning down dates - I am talking to my friends. Anyone who wanted to take that away from me would be a controlling azzzhole. Wow, how did you manage over 12,000 posts in only 6 months? I cannot believe you haven't had anyone approach you in all that time. Surely you must be exaggerating? If not, I wonder how that could possibly be. I get emails and offers for dates whether I say I am taken or not. Hell, I have even said that my significant other is moving in next week and we are talking marriage within the year and men still write to me. It doesn't matter whether my profile says "friends only" or "seeking relationship/marriage". BTW, the headline I have was changed to "seeking relationship" because it is meant for my partner's eyes. Having "seeking male for friendship", to me, felt too much like sneaking behind his back. Just me. Your mileage may vary. I agree ... men never pay attention to the 'friendship' thing .. sigh |
|
|
|
For me it would probably be a time issue more than anything. If I was in a "serious" relationship I would probably lack the time to maintain on line relationships on a dating site. It's hard enough at times to keep up with real life friends. And then there's work and kids and hobbies and chores and......
|
|
|
|
I think some people envision coupledom as being sort of a two- headed creature that moves and thinks and acts together. My slant on coupledowm is two individuals who have their own lives and who complement each other. They have no need to control every action of the other person, or even to be involved in it, because there is trust and respect. If I have to become a siamese twin, I would rather die single. ((((((((((( HIKER )))))))))))))))) Something we TOTALLY agree on. If I ever get married again, he better well know that I need my space, my interests and my life. I want to share stuff with 'him' ie, have 'our stuff' too, but not to the point that I don't have 'me' to enjoy as well. He needs to have his interests that are aside from mine. Period. Just because he may like, let's say, camping .. and I don't (prefer a 5* resort thanks very much ) I would be very happy to help him pack up his tent for the trip with the guys. |
|
|
|
if they r only chatting it should be cool.
|
|
|
|
i have a comenlaw woman and we r always on this site both of us just chatting thats all.
|
|
|
|
I guess I have been single too long because I don't even understand why a question like this needs to be asked. Aren't you still a person after you get married? Why would you have to change anything about yourself? As far as only having one pic and only being online at the same time and sharing passwords...can you say too close for comfort? Even married people need a separate identity.. Sure you can meet someone anywhere and catch someones eye, but the grocery store is not a concentration of single men looking to get lucky or find a soul mate either. Words and smileys meant to be supportive in the forums to a friend can, as I've learned recently, be easily misconstrued as interest to them and others as well. So, while I would want his undying trust, I also would not want to cause him any discomfort with that. I believe I would share my password, but have a feeling he would refuse it. I would probably just be very careful in my wording and smiley uses and make it soooo well known that I was taken or married that it could not possibly be misunderstood by all. If he did accept my password, it would have to be known by my friends and emails that held any confidences would be deleted as that was not the understanding when they were sent and future emails would be known to be shared information. |
|
|
|
Edited by
angelindarkness
on
Sun 06/22/08 10:34 AM
|
|
I had someone con me for quite a while "just chatting". Hmmpff.
I call bull****. Especially if there is a cam involved in the chatting. But, if you are both cool with it....it's not my place to dictate your relationship. |
|
|
|
I had someone con me for quite a while "just chatting". Hmmpff. I call bull****. Especially if there is a cam involved in the chatting. isn't THAT the truth .. |
|
|
|
well, the thing is, if you can't be trusted to be on here, you can't be trusted to be left alone anywhere. Being on JSH is not going to make someone cheat if they weren't already so inclined. Agreed, wholeheartedly, but why help it along? |
|
|
|
I had someone con me for quite a while "just chatting". Hmmpff. I call bull****. Especially if there is a cam involved in the chatting. isn't THAT the truth .. |
|
|
|
I had someone con me for quite a while "just chatting". Hmmpff. I call bull****. Especially if there is a cam involved in the chatting. isn't THAT the truth .. In an already established, committed relationship, a cam is a must if one partner must travel for work often. Agreed! |
|
|
|
I had someone con me for quite a while "just chatting". Hmmpff. I call bull****. Especially if there is a cam involved in the chatting. isn't THAT the truth .. In an already established, committed relationship, a cam is a must if one partner must travel for work often. Agreed! |
|
|
|
well, the thing is, if you can't be trusted to be on here, you can't be trusted to be left alone anywhere. Being on JSH is not going to make someone cheat if they weren't already so inclined. Agreed, wholeheartedly, but why help it along? |
|
|
|
I had someone con me for quite a while "just chatting". Hmmpff. I call bull****. Especially if there is a cam involved in the chatting. But, if you are both cool with it....it's not my place to dictate your relationship. |
|
|
|
well, the thing is, if you can't be trusted to be on here, you can't be trusted to be left alone anywhere. Being on JSH is not going to make someone cheat if they weren't already so inclined. Agreed, wholeheartedly, but why help it along? LOL....no, didn't mean it like that. What I said would have to be taken in context to the rest of my life, and my past. It was more a private joke to myself than anything else. |
|
|
|
I had someone con me for quite a while "just chatting". Hmmpff. I call bull****. Especially if there is a cam involved in the chatting. But, if you are both cool with it....it's not my place to dictate your relationship. I learned that lesson long ago; broken heart and all. Haven't owned a cam in years now and wouldn't use one in a ldr unless a firm real time foundation had been established first. |
|
|