Community > General Discussion

Post Reply

Topic: Do you think....
Starhawk Joined Mon 01/07/08 Posts: 2164	Mon 06/09/08 04:56 PM
48 is to old to start having a Family....?

ljcc1964 Joined Fri 10/19/07 Posts: 8298	Mon 06/09/08 04:56 PM
No.

maxxximus007 Joined Mon 11/13/06 Posts: 6082	Mon 06/09/08 04:57 PM
if thats what you want then go for it!

Alterego1961 Joined Thu 05/22/08 Posts: 828	Mon 06/09/08 04:57 PM
I hope not, I'm almost there myself!

bastet126 Joined Fri 12/07/07 Posts: 15553	Mon 06/09/08 04:59 PM
48 is to old to start having a Family....? not for a guy as long as your looking to shack up with a younger woman; unless you wanted to adopt...er...you get the idea.

mandyatl81 Joined Wed 10/10/07 Posts: 4267	Mon 06/09/08 04:59 PM
48 is to old to start having a Family....? my parents aren't even that old

Starhawk Joined Mon 01/07/08 Posts: 2164	Mon 06/09/08 04:59 PM
I hope not, I'm almost there myself! Decisions ... Decisions....

Simbelmyne Joined Sat 04/19/08 Posts: 33	Mon 06/09/08 05:00 PM
yes. it's not fair for the child. by the time the child graduates, you will be 70. imagine trying to play catch at that age. and when you die, how that can affect them at that age, and the financial burden. just something to think upon.

lilangel2 Joined Wed 03/05/08 Posts: 9096	Mon 06/09/08 05:00 PM
you mean gettin' a puppy?

TxsGal3333 Joined Tue 09/05/06 Posts: 76412	Mon 06/09/08 05:00 PM
It all depends with what each person wants for me yes for you not if that is what you want.

shaung35 Joined Tue 05/27/08 Posts: 129	Mon 06/09/08 05:01 PM
No way, there is 60+ year old man in My building, married to a 40+ Year old lady and they have a 3 year old little boy and they are one of the happiest families I have ever seen, makes Me jealous,LOL...

Starhawk Joined Mon 01/07/08 Posts: 2164	Mon 06/09/08 05:01 PM
yes. it's not fair for the child. by the time the child graduates, you will be 70. imagine trying to play catch at that age. and when you die, how that can affect them at that age, and the financial burden. just something to think upon. Isn't 70 the new 50...

DUKE1938 Joined Sun 12/24/06 Posts: 1	Mon 06/09/08 05:02 PM
you mean gettin' a puppy?

mandyatl81 Joined Wed 10/10/07 Posts: 4267	Mon 06/09/08 05:05 PM
yes. it's not fair for the child. by the time the child graduates, you will be 70. imagine trying to play catch at that age. and when you die, how that can affect them at that age, and the financial burden. just something to think upon. Isn't 70 the new 50... no...whoever said that lied

therooster Joined Mon 03/31/08 Posts: 866	Mon 06/09/08 05:06 PM


TxsGal3333 Joined Tue 09/05/06 Posts: 76412	Mon 06/09/08 05:06 PM
yes. it's not fair for the child. by the time the child graduates, you will be 70. imagine trying to play catch at that age. and when you die, how that can affect them at that age, and the financial burden. just something to think upon. OMG not fair my step-mom was 41 when she had my little sister. She had more love then most babies do. Due to I was the youngest at 15 others range up to 30 at the time. She is 34 now and yes both parents have passed away in the last 4 years. But when they passed away they had there burial already fixed. My little sister had a very fulfilling childhood and had more love then one child could ever image. So yeah I totally disagree with that theory!!

cookiemonster2 Joined Thu 08/23/07 Posts: 121	Mon 06/09/08 05:07 PM
do what u feel is right

Starhawk Joined Mon 01/07/08 Posts: 2164	Mon 06/09/08 05:09 PM
yes. it's not fair for the child. by the time the child graduates, you will be 70. imagine trying to play catch at that age. and when you die, how that can affect them at that age, and the financial burden. just something to think upon. OMG not fair my step-mom was 41 when she had my little sister. She had more love then most babies do. Due to I was the youngest at 15 others range up to 30 at the time. She is 34 now and yes both parents have passed away in the last 4 years. But when they passed away they had there burial already fixed. My little sister had a very fulfilling childhood and had more love then one child could ever image. So yeah I totally disagree with that theory!! Thanx....Starhawk

Simbelmyne Joined Sat 04/19/08 Posts: 33	Mon 06/09/08 05:22 PM
yes. it's not fair for the child. by the time the child graduates, you will be 70. imagine trying to play catch at that age. and when you die, how that can affect them at that age, and the financial burden. just something to think upon. OMG not fair my step-mom was 41 when she had my little sister. She had more love then most babies do. Due to I was the youngest at 15 others range up to 30 at the time. She is 34 now and yes both parents have passed away in the last 4 years. But when they passed away they had there burial already fixed. My little sister had a very fulfilling childhood and had more love then one child could ever image. So yeah I totally disagree with that theory!! Thanx....Starhawk well you do what you want. i'm just saying think of it from the child's point of view. do you think you would have the same energy and mind set of a 30 yr old when you are 70??? i would just be worried for the child. i have worked in different kinds of doctors offices and whatnot and i see people with dementia starting as early as their 60's. rheumatoid arthritis, heart disease, fibromyalgia, granted, any of that can happen at basically any age, i just don't want to see a child short changed that's all. on the other hand, i have seen some pretty vibrant 80 yr old grandmas! but are you willing to press your luck?