Topic: Stupid MM
Moondark's photo
Fri 04/18/08 03:51 PM
So I'm going through my mutual matches hit a hell of a lot of no's. There were fields to set parameters. I set them. Certain age range, certain mileage. Well, I got mostly people outside those ages and outside the mileage. ARG!!!!!!!!! This is the stupidest system I've ever seen for matching!!!!

Yeah, I've been here long enough to know this. It just seemed particularily noticable today.

no photo
Fri 04/18/08 03:53 PM
They had to take the system down today. It may have scrambled the preferences. That's happened to me before, too.

lilith401's photo
Fri 04/18/08 03:53 PM
Then you know the matches are not linked to your settings, right? They are totally random...flowerforyou

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 04/18/08 03:54 PM

So I'm going through my mutual matches hit a hell of a lot of no's. There were fields to set parameters. I set them. Certain age range, certain mileage. Well, I got mostly people outside those ages and outside the mileage. ARG!!!!!!!!! This is the stupidest system I've ever seen for matching!!!!

Yeah, I've been here long enough to know this. It just seemed particularily noticable today.
flowerforyou Eveything is a little scrambled todayflowerforyou

irad8you's photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:02 PM
Was i one?

Cinderella75's photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:03 PM
Mutual Match..it takes for ever for the next pic to load..I tried that..and I am a fast clicker..No, No, Hell No, Yes, No, OMG Yes..lol and so on..

AdventurousOne's photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:08 PM

So I'm going through my mutual matches hit a hell of a lot of no's. There were fields to set parameters. I set them. Certain age range, certain mileage. Well, I got mostly people outside those ages and outside the mileage. ARG!!!!!!!!! This is the stupidest system I've ever seen for matching!!!!

Yeah, I've been here long enough to know this. It just seemed particularily noticable today.


Hmmm..maybe that old term fits this situation..."you get what you pay for". flowerforyou

writer_gurl's photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:10 PM

Was i one?

You were one on minedrinker

no photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:13 PM


So I'm going through my mutual matches hit a hell of a lot of no's. There were fields to set parameters. I set them. Certain age range, certain mileage. Well, I got mostly people outside those ages and outside the mileage. ARG!!!!!!!!! This is the stupidest system I've ever seen for matching!!!!

Yeah, I've been here long enough to know this. It just seemed particularily noticable today.
flowerforyou Eveything is a little scrambled todayflowerforyou
:angry: :angry: :angry: HEY MIRROR, I resemble THAT
REMARK!!!!noway noway noway noway
noway blushing OH,,,,Its cool,,lol,lolbigsmile

Moondark's photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:14 PM

Then you know the matches are not linked to your settings, right? They are totally random...flowerforyou


When I first got on here, the matches always fit into my settings. That changed before the system went down today. Don't know why either.

lilith401's photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:17 PM


Then you know the matches are not linked to your settings, right? They are totally random...flowerforyou


When I first got on here, the matches always fit into my settings. That changed before the system went down today. Don't know why either.


Really? Mine NEVER did. Maybe they are different for everyone... They are such the Bermuda Triangle of the site!

Lily0923's photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:20 PM

Was i one?


ya, and you never emailed me.laugh laugh laugh

down with MM.....laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Fri 04/18/08 04:24 PM
In theory, the people you see as MM candidates are supposed to fall within your search parameters (age & distance, etc.) -- however, someone outside those parameters can rate you YES or MAYBE and they will show up in your candidates for you to rate.

This is how I know when certain people have already rated me a YES or MAYBE before I ever see them. If they're from outside of my settings, it's obvious.

Not that it makes any difference. I haven't seen anyone I would rate a MAYBE (forget about a YES) in many months.

I suppose it is possible that a glitch could foul up some results for some people, but I don't really know if that's the case or not....