100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: feds and dna | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 04/17/08 08:36 AM
|
|
just read in local paper
feds are going to take dna samples from EVERYONE they pick up reguardless of whether they get charged with or arrested for a crime ---------------- answer -- hello white house how may i direct your call caller -- is adolf available you get the idea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That isn't adolf. That is Big Brother! The people that seriously advocate an Orwellian society LOVE Bush. Just look at their site sometime. Maybe I can dig up the link again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA is still not that reliable yet they use it to convict people of murder everyday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If they check my DNA, they may place me in a reservation because of my Native blood. Can't see how they can do that if I only have an ounce of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well i see the locals calling the feds on a suspect and the feds picking them up for """suspicion""" of terrorism and getting dna
and wala they are now in the system threw the back door and all the sudden they either have them or clear them yes big brother as well works but the gestapo had unyielding power as well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA is still not that reliable yet they use it to convict people of murder everyday. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA is still not that reliable yet they use it to convict people of murder everyday. Agreed. Infact, DNA testing gets more reliable each and every year. It is extremely reliable today. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If they check my DNA, they may place me in a reservation because of my Native blood. Can't see how they can do that if I only have an ounce of it.
Um, not really. No one forcably places people on reservations anymore. Many many Native American's live off res and you can't force a person onto one. In fact, back home, more live off res and in town and lease out their land to white farmers and ranchers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 04/17/08 08:48 AM
|
|
well they say it is reliable but regardless
it is unreasonable search and seizer of body for them to take dna without (without permission) with no charges bn filed how many liberties will you give up for a false sense of security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well they say it is reliable but regardless it is unreasonable search and seizer of body for them o take dna without (without permission) with no charges bn filed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They're going to be putting tracking chips in drivers licenses starting next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They're going to be putting tracking chips in drivers licenses starting next year. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They're going to be putting tracking chips in drivers licenses starting next year.
you mean Canada... RIGHT? 
(pppsstt...They're watching you...  )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They're going to be putting tracking chips in drivers licenses starting next year.
you mean Canada... RIGHT?
(pppsstt...They're watching you... )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well they say it is reliable but regardless it is unreasonable search and seizer of body for them to take dna without (without permission) with no charges bn filed how many liberties will you give up for a false sense of security Oh, completely. They MUST have legitimate reason for taking DNA evidence. If they do not, then they can't. Now they can ask and people can give it without a warrant. But it is one of those things that requires a warrant. A person has every right to refuse unless there is a warrant. I would have thought that if the federal government was passing something to allow federal agents to take dna samples on anyone they pick up for anything, then there would have been more talk and outcry against such a change in the laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well they say it is reliable but regardless it is unreasonable search and seizer of body for them to take dna without (without permission) with no charges bn filed how many liberties will you give up for a false sense of security Oh, completely. They MUST have legitimate reason for taking DNA evidence. If they do not, then they can't. Now they can ask and people can give it without a warrant. But it is one of those things that requires a warrant. A person has every right to refuse unless there is a warrant. I would have thought that if the federal government was passing something to allow federal agents to take dna samples on anyone they pick up for anything, then there would have been more talk and outcry against such a change in the laws. You're forgetting about the "Patriot Act", they can do whatever they want now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats the price we pay for being socially dependent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well they say it is reliable but regardless it is unreasonable search and seizer of body for them to take dna without (without permission) with no charges bn filed how many liberties will you give up for a false sense of security Oh, completely. They MUST have legitimate reason for taking DNA evidence. If they do not, then they can't. Now they can ask and people can give it without a warrant. But it is one of those things that requires a warrant. A person has every right to refuse unless there is a warrant. I would have thought that if the federal government was passing something to allow federal agents to take dna samples on anyone they pick up for anything, then there would have been more talk and outcry against such a change in the laws. according to the article the congr(ass) passed legislation making it legal but it is still unconstitutional (if there is still such a thing) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
articles
----------- tulsa world http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=20080417_1_C10_hInte00440 ------------ business week http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D903K0IG0.htm ------------ gggggggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You're forgetting about the "Patriot Act", they can do whatever they want now. true that people have no clue what the unpatriot act permits or makes illegal (like this thread) |
|
|
|
|
