Community > Posts By > Serverousprime

 
Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 08:03 PM
Photo

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 04:59 PM
Nope...

Pinky?

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 04:59 PM
Oh No! No! I Never go to Work!
Oh No! No! I Never go to Work!
On monday I stay at home.
On tuesday....

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 01:19 PM
Manamana!

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 01:18 PM
Manamana!

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 01:18 PM
sorry was a bit late...


Storm?

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 01:17 PM
Ahhh Nuts!

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 01:14 PM
Iceman

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 12:00 PM
Singing songs with larry

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 11:59 AM
Sweet yes...
Lady no...

someone genuine?

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 11:57 AM
27,004
27,005
27,006
27,007
27,008
27,009
27,010

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 11:54 AM
Fresh

Serverousprime's photo
Thu 10/02/14 11:03 AM


I really don't think they will

its too difficult to define what is 'consent' in a two person event like sex/making love

I don't think this changes that,, I can think immediatel of examples where I was in a few of the above situations and made love but it wasn't rape,,,

I have been involvd with someone who was 'threatening' to leave, and we were immediately after CONENTUALLY involve

I have been involved with a supervisor(relationship) but it was still consentual


I have been laying next to someone I was in a relationship and awakened to intimacy,, and it was consentual

I have never been drunk, but many cases where that is concerned involve BOTH parties being drunk,, so I never have understood how they determine RAPE just from the drinking


point being, besided possibly the handicap or incapacitation, I don't see where any of the considerations really clear up wheter something was consentual or not

and AT THE END OF THE DAY,, we still will only be left with what two people say happened,,,,

I say its best not to get ourselves into such iffy situations

I certainly don't want to see sexual relations legislated

rape is difficult to discern and prosecute, but I really don't think this adds anything that will make it any easier,,,


I get what you are saying here, so let me explain some things. Mostly all non private Colleges and Universities survive on the funding from both the State and Federal level. In fact the university of California was funded $142 million or more by the State alone. If UC doesn't comply they loose this funding. This is approximately between a third and a quarter of it's total funds for this fiscal year. That is a big chunk.

Any acts that are deemed as "consensual" by both parties wouldn't be considered because it is "consensual". Those aren't iffy situations, nor would they be considered by the court. It becomes an issue if one of the parties involved or a witness decides to tell police, or in the cases when the university is involved an university official. It is at that point that investigations are involved to determine if the act was consensual or not.

You are right that it would be hard for the police to just go by inebriation level that's why they also consider other factors like, how long the two knew each other. Was either party passed out. Witnesses accounts prior to the act. where the act happened.

Also you are right that this will increase "false" accusations, but it will also increase "true" accusations as well. This way more men and women can come forward and reduce intolerable acts. Don't forget that we of the US consider someone as innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof is on the accuser.

Serverousprime's photo
Wed 10/01/14 09:24 PM
Awww thanks!
blushing

Kay?

Serverousprime's photo
Wed 10/01/14 09:24 PM
Flower power

Serverousprime's photo
Wed 10/01/14 09:22 PM
kinky

Serverousprime's photo
Wed 10/01/14 09:15 PM
hmmm....

Serverousprime's photo
Wed 10/01/14 09:15 PM
Epidermus

Serverousprime's photo
Wed 10/01/14 08:32 PM
megaman

Serverousprime's photo
Wed 10/01/14 08:32 PM
Eyefull