'Not' exactly. However, Mingle's helped me realize myself, 'one step further'.

Sometimes, 'seriousness' helps one understand and appreciate 'casual' behavior, in consummation (much as 'darkness' helps appreciate the sanctity of 'light')



How I wish I could 'actually' understand 50 percent of what I stated. 'Silly' me..

Beautiful observation. Thank you for 'sharing'.

I understand. Thank you for understanding me.


This world 'seems' to be 'overflowing' with 'love' but devoid of 'understanding'.. ? I 'hope' not.

Accepted.

Child's Play!

And sometimes ('not' always), 'that' love wavers as the 'kid' grows up.. particularly, as the 'kids' grow up..one proves to be 'financially' stable while the other keeps 'staggering' at an unenviable paltry monthly income..

'Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.'


[Steven Wright]

"He has achieved success who has lived well, laughed often, and loved much; who has enjoyed the trust of pure women, the respect of intelligent men and the love of little children; who has filled his niche and accomplished his task; who has left the world better than he found it, whether an improved poppy, a perfect poem, or a rescued soul; who has always looked for the best in others and given them the best he had; whose life was an inspiration; whose memory a benediction."



[The 'Ralph Waldo Emerson Society' - 'Success']

Seemingly, we need 'help' to ask for help.




Probably, because the 'human mind' gains the impression that 'asking for help' is a manifestation of a 'weakling'; and most of us, human beings, find it 'below our dignity', to be branded a 'weakling'.

You are welcome.

ABRACADABRA Read (as) ABRACADABRA!







L K L

Hi Butribu. 'That' was very well expressed.

Lovely!

If considered from the viewpoint of the English lexicon (dictionary), well, 'YES', the word 'forever' does exist.

However, in practical life, I doubt whether 'forever' holds ground, in veracity.

If I were to consider 'that' as a 'paradigm' (which I'm 'not' claiming I 'am') I'd infer that Science Is Evil. IMO 'Science' was never 'Evil'. 'Application' of 'Science' may not have been 'noble' always. In other words, it's the 'application' (rather than the 'subject'), that may be categorized as 'Evil' or otherwise.



In similar terms, 'brain' is simply 'brain' - the 'primary' organ (other than 'heart') for a 'normal' living. 'Application' of the brain, is what we term as 'Evil' or 'Noble'.


Reminds me of 'someone' once telling me: 'Devious means can only be devised by people who are brainy/intelligent. Ones possessing 'low' IQ are incapable of committing 'Evil'!' Seemingly, a 'flawless' observation of the human mind.



One small point: Although, 'root of all Evil is the brain', 'root of all noble deeds (too), is the brain.' People might say, that it's the 'humanity' factor of the human heart, which enables a human being, to do something 'commendable'. However, I may add that 'along with such an attribute', one needs a 'Beautiful Mind' (too) to perform (and achieve) something 'noble' and 'selfless', in the real sense!









Probably, this thread didn't 'solicit' my opinion. However, I felt like sharing. Thank you 'Sassy'. Stay safe. Keep smiling.

Were we brought into this world, for absolutely no fault of ours?

Ausgezeichnet