100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
|
Now that changing gender is socially acceptable why not be able to change your race as well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is one thing to say I will do x,y and z but it is another to show how you are going to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now back to the OP...
Jeb is not going to win the nomination no matter how hard the establishment or media prop him up. He has zero chance to win a general election. He is a bigger gift to Hillary than McCain/Palin was to Obama. And that is sayin something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"yes, he did..." mm
Yes. President Clinton and Speaker Gingrich conspired to repeal Glass-Steagel. BAD IDEA! That indeed set the stage for the economic failure late in the subsequent Bush administration. "i think it was a ploy to blame it on the republicans after he was out..." mm
Doubtful. It could have done to Clinton what it instead did to Bush. "Slick Willy" isn't stupid enough to take that kind of political risk. Don't forget the dot com bubble that burst... Clinton takes credit for 'his' economy, but never really mentions that 'his' economy was in large part due to the massive bubble growth in tech.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinton did a great job setting the stage for the financial collapse..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
InvictusV
on
Fri 06/12/15 06:02 PM
|
|
I guess maybe they should have outlawed kool-aid after Jonestown...
Makes about as much sense as this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dandy. How? U.S. boots on the ground? You want ANOTHER U.S. ground war in the Middle East? Start dropping nukes now? The United States of America is the only nation to have used nuclear weapons in War. We get a pass on the WWII thing, because ... you know: - it was a World War, & - we were the only nation that had them. If we as indifferent to nuking diaper-heads as we were about nuking little yellow people; what do you think that will do to our standing in this globalizing world? The nukes were dropped on Japan to end the war and actually to save more lives had the war continued(which it would have). Not just being indifferent. The nukes (WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION) were not droped to save more lives, if you research the historical information now released, you can see clearly that Japan was on the verge of losing and surrender. The nukes were droped because US wanted a reason to test their bomb in real life. REMEMBER : TWO, and I repeat 2 NUKE BOMBS were droped. One would have had the same impact of ending the war is that was the aim, but dropping those damn WMD put the world on this course we now fear. How is it that so many people speak so easerly about nuking other countries??? AND MORE INSANE, pre-emptively. So if another country feels US/West MIGHT nuke them would you say "Oh well they felt threatened so its OK for us to be nuked?? In 1991 I watch on T.V. those bombs fall on cities in middle east, in what was described by the US as wanting to create "SHOCK and AWE" this action was to "help the people of that country be free" Hummm, well if some one suggested my country was bombed like that, killing hundreads of thousand times more people that the bad guys they were trying to free the people from, I think I would not be pleased. CRAZY< CRAZY< CRAZY. Yes, Japan was losing the war but vowed to fight to the last man standing. There were killings and suicides every day. Over 1,000 suicides a day actually from Bonzai Cliff done by basic Japanese citizens under orders from the Emperor and the millions that would have died by fighting. The second bomb proved serious and that brought Japan to the negotiating table immediately. Keep telling yourself that so you can sleep with ease, while the poor souls who are still suffering from those nukes continue to have deformed babies. I lived in London all through the 1980's and 90's when the IRA was planting bombs on trains and places all over London. Every day going to work I knew a bomb could kill me. They bombed hotel that killed members of the British govenment AND their families, as well as many ordinary people. They used kiddnapped, torture and all sorts of terrible ways to get themselves heard on the world stage. I supported IRA on principle, but hated the form of action they took. NO ONE from USA or EUROPE EVER said or even suggested we should bomb them. WHY?? because they were European and the outcry would have crushed the govenment. Eventually the British Govenment did start talking to IRA and addressed their claims for self rule and what do you think happened?? within a few years, peace. There is no justification for what IRA did, those people are dead and their families lives were destroyed. The peace can't change that, BUT our govenment did not stoop to the level of the IRA's action (as far as I know) as we seem to be doing in islamic countries. We caught Gin Laden and ignore all international law for criminals of WAR. They just acted like the terrorist and kill him and dumped him in sea? how is that civil. how is that demonstrating to the world of tyranical leaders that WE a the democratic LAW DRIVEN society? Gaddaffi and others, just killed, no public hearing or investigations? BUT everyone says it's ok? even the Natzi's got hearings and the world got to understand, and SEE that our DEMOCRATIC LAWs, international or national, IS what makes us different. I SAY. I do not support these actions. Bad things will continue to happen in our name, when good people like yourselves, justify, ignore, and BS themselves about the truth of it's effect on humans, our earth and our common humanity. I wish you clairity and hope we will never have to experience the reality of a nuke on our nation, cities, families. This comparison to the IRA is just absurd.. The Japanese murdered anywhere from 40,000 to 300,000 civilians in Nanking alone. Not to mention what they did everywhere else they went. The estimates are between 3,000,000 and 10,000,000 million civilians murdered. MURDERED.... Not collateral damage... SYSTEMATICALLY MURDERED.. Keep defending that... I am not comparing anything sir. I am stating that when you are threatened with being bombed/killed, it does not matter how many before or after are killed, its your life. could you still not hate the ones who might kill you for a cause? I am not a memeber of these islamic, japan, African nations, They do not represent ME. OUR GOVENMENT DOES. I am sure ISIS claims that the murder they do is collateral damage too. Nukes, carpet bombs, agent orange ... on and on IS SYSTEMATIC MURDER my friend. B U T.... IF you want to play a numbers game of how many we killed to how many they killed, you've already lost, cos well killed millions more than any other nation on the planet with our bombs/ Really... I have no idea what country you are from or referring to, but I can assure you that the US has killed far less than the British French Russians or Germans. So maybe you ought to check that numbers game again. Systematic murder is done by a planned method. Carpet bombing cities when the goals are to hit manufacturing targets is not systematic murder of civilians. Hiroshima was picked for 3 reasons. It was a port... It was a large industrial center... A Japanese military command headquarters was there. There was no plan to drop an atomic bomb on a large civilian population. There were much bigger cities for that. I can keep going if you wish, but I think I made it clear that you are wrong again.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dandy. How? U.S. boots on the ground? You want ANOTHER U.S. ground war in the Middle East? Start dropping nukes now? The United States of America is the only nation to have used nuclear weapons in War. We get a pass on the WWII thing, because ... you know: - it was a World War, & - we were the only nation that had them. If we as indifferent to nuking diaper-heads as we were about nuking little yellow people; what do you think that will do to our standing in this globalizing world? The nukes were dropped on Japan to end the war and actually to save more lives had the war continued(which it would have). Not just being indifferent. The nukes (WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION) were not droped to save more lives, if you research the historical information now released, you can see clearly that Japan was on the verge of losing and surrender. The nukes were droped because US wanted a reason to test their bomb in real life. REMEMBER : TWO, and I repeat 2 NUKE BOMBS were droped. One would have had the same impact of ending the war is that was the aim, but dropping those damn WMD put the world on this course we now fear. How is it that so many people speak so easerly about nuking other countries??? AND MORE INSANE, pre-emptively. So if another country feels US/West MIGHT nuke them would you say "Oh well they felt threatened so its OK for us to be nuked?? In 1991 I watch on T.V. those bombs fall on cities in middle east, in what was described by the US as wanting to create "SHOCK and AWE" this action was to "help the people of that country be free" Hummm, well if some one suggested my country was bombed like that, killing hundreads of thousand times more people that the bad guys they were trying to free the people from, I think I would not be pleased. CRAZY< CRAZY< CRAZY. Yes, Japan was losing the war but vowed to fight to the last man standing. There were killings and suicides every day. Over 1,000 suicides a day actually from Bonzai Cliff done by basic Japanese citizens under orders from the Emperor and the millions that would have died by fighting. The second bomb proved serious and that brought Japan to the negotiating table immediately. Keep telling yourself that so you can sleep with ease, while the poor souls who are still suffering from those nukes continue to have deformed babies. I lived in London all through the 1980's and 90's when the IRA was planting bombs on trains and places all over London. Every day going to work I knew a bomb could kill me. They bombed hotel that killed members of the British govenment AND their families, as well as many ordinary people. They used kiddnapped, torture and all sorts of terrible ways to get themselves heard on the world stage. I supported IRA on principle, but hated the form of action they took. NO ONE from USA or EUROPE EVER said or even suggested we should bomb them. WHY?? because they were European and the outcry would have crushed the govenment. Eventually the British Govenment did start talking to IRA and addressed their claims for self rule and what do you think happened?? within a few years, peace. There is no justification for what IRA did, those people are dead and their families lives were destroyed. The peace can't change that, BUT our govenment did not stoop to the level of the IRA's action (as far as I know) as we seem to be doing in islamic countries. We caught Gin Laden and ignore all international law for criminals of WAR. They just acted like the terrorist and kill him and dumped him in sea? how is that civil. how is that demonstrating to the world of tyranical leaders that WE a the democratic LAW DRIVEN society? Gaddaffi and others, just killed, no public hearing or investigations? BUT everyone says it's ok? even the Natzi's got hearings and the world got to understand, and SEE that our DEMOCRATIC LAWs, international or national, IS what makes us different. I SAY. I do not support these actions. Bad things will continue to happen in our name, when good people like yourselves, justify, ignore, and BS themselves about the truth of it's effect on humans, our earth and our common humanity. I wish you clairity and hope we will never have to experience the reality of a nuke on our nation, cities, families. This comparison to the IRA is just absurd.. The Japanese murdered anywhere from 40,000 to 300,000 civilians in Nanking alone. Not to mention what they did everywhere else they went. The estimates are between 3,000,000 and 10,000,000 million civilians murdered. MURDERED.... Not collateral damage... SYSTEMATICALLY MURDERED.. Keep defending that... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Why No Obamatrade?
|
|
Well because all of this is under wraps, the conspiracy people are having a field day. I would say though there are troubling issues regarding the legislation. For example, 1) The treaty has been in negotiation for SIX YEARS. So essentially from Day 1 of his presidency Obama has been working on this deal, and its only the last couple months where things have started to percolate out about it. Seems he kinda forgot to mention it during the last election cycle. You know when the White House fudged the unemployment numbers? How it's failed to calculate the true number of unemployed for years now? 2) People are saying that ONE copy of the bill has been made available for congress and the senate to read. It's essentially under guard, you cannot make copies, and you cannot take notes and then leave the room with the notes. That's a level of secrecy that NO politician should be agreeing to in regards to a trade document. This is not national security stuff on what size of figs the head of ISIS enjoys. 3) Immigration issues will be mandated by the treaty. 4) Personal information will be shared without your consent with other countries signed to the treaty. 5) Much has been made of congress no longer being able to change Medicare, as that will be illegal under the new law. 6) Apparently the content of the bill cannot even be made available to the general public until FOUR YEARS after it's passed into law. Really? So the American taxpayer will become subject to laws it gave no permission via the ballot box to negotiate (Obama's 6 year long secret), whose elected officials likely haven't even read (uninformed consent), AND they can't even KNOW the details of those laws for four years? SERIOUSLY???? Will SOMEONE please explain to me WHY the GOP has NOT impeached Obama???? They can hire Sandy Berger to go in and stuff the important pages in his socks and underwear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Why No Obamatrade?
|
|
What could possibly go wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had an incident here in which 3 cops ran into the middle of about 60 college kids. They starting throwing some to the ground and it was video taped. The cops defense was that they felt threatened by the kids that were standing around them.
What the phuck did they think was going to happen when they ran into the middle of 60 people? They have this attitude that its all balls to the wall and their authority supersedes basic fundamental rights like walking down a damn sidewalk.. They are getting sued and the city will lose and have to pay another few million... These idiotic actions cost people money and obviously in some cases lives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True change starts with ending crony capitalism. When politicans can dole out taxpayer money to people that donated to their campaigns or their families and it is just accepted practice things are never going to change. I like what you are saying. I think we need to be able to earmark on or tax forms how we want our taxes spent and the gov't required to report back to us in some fashion where our money went....in just the same way that gov't contractors have to report back to them now. They could be fairly general categories with a certain percentage set aside to actually run the government. That is closer to the type of freedom from oppression that the country was founded on: Freedom from taxation w/out representation was a primary impetus for the Declaration Those are good ideas.. I would like to see that people who donate or bundle over a certain amount are not eligible for any government money for a certain period of time. WE need to end these campaigns for president that require billions of dollars in contributions. It is just assinine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True change starts with ending crony capitalism.
When politicans can dole out taxpayer money to people that donated to their campaigns or their families and it is just accepted practice things are never going to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is the TSA Really Necessary?
|
|
"prohibition doesnt work" t8
And despite the fact that I'M the one that cited that specific example as something that doesn't work, you still think it's necessary to state this? "As shown in the report last week... TSA failed miserably." IV
"Miserably"? Alright. BUT !! Completely? Perhaps not. Simply knowing they're there, may have discouraged 09/11/01 style skyjack terror. We don't know if the TSA discouraged anyone. What we DO know is; there has not been any 09/11/01 style skyjackings in TSA's jurisdiction since the TSA took station. There's clearly room for improvement, and even privatization. But abandoning airline security would probably be unwise. If you take a test and get 5% correct what would you call that? You almost passed? I know a little about security and I can say that a 95% failure rate is miserably atrocious by any measureable standard. TSA presence may have kept people away, but they sure as hell won't be worried now knowing how god awful they are at finding anything that can actually bring down a plane.. There needs to be security at airports. There needs not be government run unionized mall cops parading as FBI agents. They can get new jobs working at target as loss prevention officers.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is the TSA Really Necessary?
|
|
"prohibition doesnt work" t8
And despite the fact that I'M the one that cited that specific example as something that doesn't work, you still think it's necessary to state this? "As shown in the report last week... TSA failed miserably." IV
"Miserably"? Alright. BUT !! Completely? Perhaps not. Simply knowing they're there, may have discouraged 09/11/01 style skyjack terror. We don't know if the TSA discouraged anyone. What we DO know is; there has not been any 09/11/01 style skyjackings in TSA's jurisdiction since the TSA took station. There's clearly room for improvement, and even privatization. But abandoning airline security would probably be unwise. If you take a test and get 5% correct what would you call that? You almost passed? I know a little about security and I can say that a 95% failure rate is miserably atrocious by any measureable standard. TSA presence may have kept people away, but they sure as hell won't be worried now knowing how god awful they are at finding anything that can actually bring down a plane.. There needs to be security at airports. There needs not be government run unionized mall cops parading as FBI agents. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is the TSA Really Necessary?
|
|
As shown in the report last week... TSA failed miserably..
If they can't do their job then why do they exist? Multiple failures by the Transportation Security Administration highlight the need for change at the agency, security expert Anthony Roman said Tuesday. A new Department of Homeland Security Inspector General report released Monday found that the TSA had failed to identify 73 employees with links to terrorism. The news followed last week's reports that checkpoint screeners at U.S. airports failed to detect mock explosives and weapons in 95 percent of undercover tests. That led to the reassignment of the acting TSA director, with the acting deputy director leading the agency until a new acting administrator was appointed. Roman called it a failure at every level. "Just about everything is going wrong there," the founder and CEO of the security and investigations firm Roman & Associates said in an interview with CNBC's "Closing Bell." http://www.cnbc.com/id/102746539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
InvictusV
on
Tue 06/09/15 03:52 PM
|
|
Someone volunteer to go to as many countries as they can wearing a 'gay pride' hat and a 'your god is fake tshirt'..
You can start in Europe and move east... It is an easy way to settle the debate... But we may need more than one volunteer.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dandy. How? U.S. boots on the ground? You want ANOTHER U.S. ground war in the Middle East? Start dropping nukes now? The United States of America is the only nation to have used nuclear weapons in War. We get a pass on the WWII thing, because ... you know: - it was a World War, & - we were the only nation that had them. If we as indifferent to nuking diaper-heads as we were about nuking little yellow people; what do you think that will do to our standing in this globalizing world? The nukes were dropped on Japan to end the war and actually to save more lives had the war continued(which it would have). Not just being indifferent. The nukes (WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION) were not droped to save more lives, if you research the historical information now released, you can see clearly that Japan was on the verge of losing and surrender. The nukes were droped because US wanted a reason to test their bomb in real life. REMEMBER : TWO, and I repeat 2 NUKE BOMBS were droped. One would have had the same impact of ending the war is that was the aim, but dropping those damn WMD put the world on this course we now fear. How is it that so many people speak so easerly about nuking other countries??? AND MORE INSANE, pre-emptively. So if another country feels US/West MIGHT nuke them would you say "Oh well they felt threatened so its OK for us to be nuked?? In 1991 I watch on T.V. those bombs fall on cities in middle east, in what was described by the US as wanting to create "SHOCK and AWE" this action was to "help the people of that country be free" Hummm, well if some one suggested my country was bombed like that, killing hundreads of thousand times more people that the bad guys they were trying to free the people from, I think I would not be pleased. CRAZY< CRAZY< CRAZY. If they were so ready to surrender then why did they wait until the second bomb was dropped? There is plenty of real evidence in film and pictures of the military training civilians to repel an invasion. Your theory is BS.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They can't touch Al because it would be racist to do so. ( He's got the card up his sleeve). Good morning Ms, I thought you would like this post. 
good morning wasnt racist to put OJ away forever for trying to get his own stuff back wasnt racist to go after Wesley Snipes,,,lol nah, 'race card' does a pretty poor job of keeping people out of jail 
There is a difference between owing back taxes and attempting to defraud. Snipes filed 2 returns claiming he was owed $11 million in refunds. Ironically he was acquitted on the fraud charges, but was found guilty of not filing returns for 3 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The US is the only bad country that has ever existed... No one else has ever done a sinlge thing wrong...
No worries... That wasn't to be taken seriously.. Wars in the national interest are usually based on economics. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
