I think that would be beyond the cost scope of Odumbocare, more like: |
|
|
|
Sort of like that "New World Order" thing, a world where you never have to look out for yourself as everyone else has that covered. "In the United States, the majority undertakes to supply a multitude of ready-made opinions for the use of individuals, who are thus relieved from the necessity of forming opinions of their own." -Alexis de Tocqueville quite the contrare... it is what we have NOW, an "old world order", that is based upon the "good ole boy" network, on dynastic families passing power only to those interconnected, which be much more an oligarch rule, cloaked as democracy for those who can't follow the money trail which be the chain of command trail, which be the chain of power. religious wouldbee dictators and dynastic family oligarchs maintaining rule by supplying the choices based upon the biggest money sacks, be the actual rule we have had for 238 years. and since your quoting another opinion, AGAIN, that means you are doing exactly what the quote you posted said. but you don't realize all the data be the hand fed data. such is the data of any self interest agenda, that convince's one that it ever had a true DEMOCRACY even from the beginning. a true democracy would be direct vote, no electoral, of each head alive over voting age, all contenders on all ballots by direct vote, in a direct vote by the people... no different than a NFL play off elimination. And one is but a wee too late for an old system, since the last six presidents explicitly called for a new world order... not to mention Putin and and most other heads of states of all the G7 and Brics... so it is coming... at this stage world leaders are just hashing out who shall sit atop, and how power will be delegated... so it simply seems a matter of being pro-active in shaping a larger power structure into something as positve as possible... and not trying to go backwards, as nothing in the world shall succeed in that... no different than trying to eliminate cd going back to 8-tracks... shape the future, not recreate a failed past. it ain't gonna happen. The correct usage is au contraire, mid-14c., from Anglo-French contrarie, from Latin contrarius "opposite, opposed," from contra "against". If you must use the English derivitive, then it would be quite contrary, which would apply to my opinion of your reply. There is nothing "new" within this universe, just the constant repeat of things past because of the base trait of man to little pay attention to what is going on around them. But current times, they are not of the "old world order" as you so aptly call it, they are but the failed attempts at the manifestation of the supposed "new world order", the total slavery of the masses. And you really should keep your day job as you seem to have little knowledge of psychology nor it seems the acquisition of knowledge without using personal experience. Those that fail to study history are doomed to repeat it. Personally I prefer to accept the manifested causation of those before me. Ah, Democracy, rule of the mob, that which is doomed to chaos and oligarchy, the rule of the psychopaths that believe they are god and destined to rule. You want "Direct" democracy, then go on over to Switzerland but I doubt they would let you in. Good old direct vote, just look at where that has got us, how's that working out for you? To those that have actually taken the time to understand the electoral college and other manifestations of freedom, we would rather restore the republic. It is but a matter of time before this misconception of "New World Order" goes the way it has gone many times in the past and anarchy reins. Oh, and it's going to happen. The only question is how many pieces will remain with which to structure the future. I would suggest one learn the value of sticks and stones and practice archery. |
|
|
|
I have mentioned before,, 1 sexual assaults, and 1 attempted (Where our fight resulted in him running off and me running the OTHER WAY) , would that count as 'strong arm'? your experience is unfortunate, as was mine, but it still doesn't change how I feel about the Wilson/Brown experience,,, I am sorry for your situation, I really am, one thing I hate more then anything are rapists and child abusers but you WERE able to get away. Even if you weren't and you were in fear of your life you could have used whatever force necessary to stop the situation. This is a different situation, its a situation where its your job to take a criminal into custody. The situation you aren't able to get away and it's a fisticuffs with someone high on drugs who just committed a crime and knows he's screwed if the cops get them. Fight or flight kicks in and they WILL do ANYTHING to get away and I have seen some weird crap and attempts. Evidence shows Brown was in the cops car attacking the officer. Most officers have three guns in the front seat of their car, the one on their hip, a shotgun and a backup gun on their person or quickly accessible in the front seat (and I just found out that most State Troopers and Sheriff's Deputies have fully automatic weapons in their trunks here in Nevada) not to mention the numerous other weapons on the officers person Brown was in proximity to. In just about every poll taken an overwhelming majority thought Wilson was justified, not to mention the African Americans who sat on the grand jury. my experiences and opinions aren't shaped by what others choose to believe I haven't spoken to ANYONE on the grand jury to hear the process they went through,,, Zimmerman was acquitted 'unanimously' as well, but we later learned there was quite a bit of 'persuading' happening in the process and not a case of everyone just believing it was the case,,,, I do not believe there was a need to escalate to killing the suspect after he fled I do not believe that after he fled he suddenly turned and just 'charged' either,,,, ,,I do not even see the point in rehashing beliefs about that one incident as that officer was NEVER going to be charged and never will be the bigger picture is the abuse of power and the corruption within certain police departments that has been given a free pass for too long,,, Bull, bull, and more bull. There is not a single factual statement, just what one would like to be factual. Always something that those involved must have missed. Somehow that should have believed that which should have been and as such made a bad decision. All those people directly involved, but your judgement is what they should have chosen. Two thugs, both dead, thank god, end of story. |
|
|
|
so,you still believe the Police is about to "Serve And Protect"? Maybe,but not the Man on the Street! They are there to enforce the Law enacted by some Sleazebag Politicians,against the Citizenry! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-lava/when-did-to-serve--protec_b_4174736.html Ah yes, the old asset forfeiture law for those subject to the "color" of law. Victimless crimes that end up producing victims from those very ones subject to the color of law. Another symptom of a "society" so inept as to not understand what is occurring but so objectively believing in the authority of another justifying the crime. The travesty is: Which action was actually the crime? The real fun of the game is the lawful seizure of assets from the actual perpetrators of the crime from one that understands the law and can stand "sui juris". |
|
|
|
As Ive said before,, the grand jury has spoken and it cant be undone, but it was certainly the tip of an iceberg that has been developing for a LONG TIME,,, Grand Jury, a term with which you seem to be totally unfamiliar. Do you actually know what a grand jury is? It would seem the answer to the question would be a resounding, NO. |
|
|
|
Wow, will surprises never cease, but then the meaning is not what is implied or one would never commit in that direction. |
|
|
|
(Reuters) - A Ferguson, Missouri, resident has been accused of firing a handgun at a police helicopter and threatening a witness during civil unrest that followed the fatal shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown in August, police said on Tuesday. Terrell Doss, 28, was charged with two counts of second degree assault against a law enforcement officer, one count of first degree assault and three counts of armed criminal action, St. Louis County Police said in a statement. How would you classify this? Here we have a black man who shot at a Police helicopter then threatened a person who witnessed the deed. The black man did not know the 2 police officers on board or the pilot. Clearly he shot at them in a attempt to harm or kill them.. solely because they were police officers. Is that not a hate crime? When you set out to harm or kill someone because of what that person believes in, stands for or does for a living.. is that not the definition of a hate crime? no, that is not what a hate crime is, its just a normal crime, which the justice system has held someone accountable for,, as it should be,,, No, that is absolutely what a hate crime is no matter how you may try to twist and spin. |
|
|
|
This is awesome. It's unfortunate that more police don't serve and protect their communities with an understanding of the populace in mind. Hats off to those officers. Their good will should be celebrated especially at a time with as much racial tension as there is now. Nah, the unfortunate part is that the good ones aren't news worthy. Even more unfortunate is the rate they are a dying breed and being drummed out by the psychopaths. As good old Odumbo recently stated, the police need more government training. Imagine!!! |
|
|
|
except I heard about it before this post on a major news channel,,, so, I guess they cover it after all, while also covering the protests of those cops who don't fit this bill,,, and the racism isn't specific to white officers, its an illness amongst AMERICANS of all shades, including those whose occupation is in a public service area,,, Really, and just which channel would that be? What network? And I would agree that racism isn't specific to "white" officers, seems to be quite heavy right here. |
|
|
|
My dad wanted me to know my great grand daddy on my mom side an took me to meet him in texas when I was like 11yr. So when my dad told him I was his great grand son an he ask to shake my hand. I said hella no an went outside an set on the porch late night. My dad came outside an ask me what was wrong? I said you told me that he is my great grand daddy right. My dad said yes he is. I said but hes a ***** a white patty. Before you go to calling him out his name an all that. Remember he is your great grand dad son. Funny my great grand dad an I became good friends. Again please don't tell me something about the humman race I already know. Tell me something I don't know. If theres a hella below. Trust me we all going to go. |
|
|
|
My kind of woman ;) What, unattainable? A dream? |
|
|
|
Thars why satan doesn't want to be cast alone in it and will take as many with him indeed indeed... so who or what be manifesting satanic mentality... for to answer that expose then truly the only "satan" that exist. fear for self. self protect. versus whole group protect. if self protect mechanism kicks in, such will create any human into one totally ok with others suffering so long as one self can, or thinks it can, escape suffering for it self... the only satan only being this mentality that exist in human beings. Sort of like that "New World Order" thing, a world where you never have to look out for yourself as everyone else has that covered. "In the United States, the majority undertakes to supply a multitude of ready-made opinions for the use of individuals, who are thus relieved from the necessity of forming opinions of their own." -Alexis de Tocqueville |
|
|
|
Don't just listen. Pay attention as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1xmXOP3lhM I'm just saying. erieartist Pay attention to what, a mediocre artist that were it not for the movie "Shaft" would have passed in obscurity. And as for the title, just slave talk used by the religious sect to keep the masses in line. If you don't mind the "master" qualified to interpret the "good" word, then you will "rot" in hell for all eternity. But "hell", relax, you're already there. |
|
|
|
Yay Wallyworld. Everything you don't need...under one roof. Hey, hanging out in the parking lot of your local Wallyworld is like going to the circus to catch the freak show, but no admission charge. |
|
|
|
The (Gag Law) has been approved in Spain. With this law, the production and distribution of images of the police in action, can get you a 30.000 Eur fine. 1. Photographing or recording police - 600 to 30.000 Euro fine. 2. Peaceful disobedience to authority - 600 to 30.000 Euro fine. 3. Occupying banks as means of protest - 600 to 30.000 Euro fine. 4. Not formalizing a protest - 600 to 30.000 Euro fine. 5. For carrying out assemblies or meetings in public spaces - 100 to 600 Euro fine. 6. For impeding or stopping an eviction - 600 to 30.000 Euro fine. 7. For presence at an occupied space (not only social centers but also houses occupied by evicted families) - 100 to 600 Euro fine. 8. Police black lists for protestors, activists and alternative press have been legalized. 9. Meeting or gathering in front of Congress - 600 to 30.000 Euro fine. 10. Appealing the fines in court requires the payment of judicial costs, whose amount depends on the fine. 11. It allows random identity checks, allowing for profiling of immigrants and minorities. 12. Police can now carry out raids at their discretion, without the need for "order" to have been disrupted. 13. External bodily searches are also now allowed at police discretion. 14. The government can prohibit any protest at will, if it feels "order" will be disrupted. 15. Any ill-defined "critical infrastructure" is now considered a forbidden zone for public gatherings if it might affect their functioning. 16. There are also fines for people who climb buildings and monuments without permission. And the slaves come marchin' in, and the slaves come marchin' in. Oh the glory of a statist population so wanting to be led. And now matters are coming round full circle, right on back to the fascist era of the 1930s. |
|
|
|
http://rightwingnews.com/culture/video-black-womans-bold-statement-sure-enrage-ferguson-protesters/ Now that is a real person, hooray for her. |
|
|
|
Well I consider Obama a very large part of the government...just look at what he has said and by his actions(or inaction)to perpetrate the lies. He also "nominated" Al Sharpton (I would consider that the left-liberal wing of the Democratic party) to do the usual race bating on behalf of the administration. Anyway..The whole scam of the last six years is to not have a "legitimate" source. Nobody ever knows anything in this administration. I have not seen President Obama walking with his hands in the air chanting "Don't Shoot". Can you direct me to the video of this, which YOU have seen, but that has not yet made it to my national or local news? Of course you haven't, that would require comprehension of the actions he has actually taken. Even the mass media has shown the implications of his actions. And why direct to additional sources when the ones already viewed remain occulted. I am not aware that President Obama has "nominated" Al Sharpton for ANYthing; please provide a citation to a legitimate source for THAT presented-as-fact statement. A true statement, not aware. But it seems a large portion of the world is acutely aware of the relationship between Odumbo and Sharpton. The rest - if not the aforementioned - is simply knee-jerking emotional reactionism, which does not belong in an intelligent discussion...which is what I AM here for. |
|
|
|
Well I consider Obama a very large part of the government...just look at what he has said and by his actions(or inaction)to perpetrate the lies. He also "nominated" Al Sharpton (I would consider that the left-liberal wing of the Democratic party) to do the usual race bating on behalf of the administration. Anyway..The whole scam of the last six years is to not have a "legitimate" source. Nobody ever knows anything in this administration. Yeah, I would agree with that and hey, doesn't that race baiter, Holdem Up work for Odumbo? |
|
|
|
... The fake news about the poor child who was "murdered" while his hands were in the air or shot in the back took off and was used by opportunists from the liberal wing of the government and Democratic party... Citation to a legitimate source for this presented-as-fact statement? Read the Grand Jury transcripts...over 60 witnesses from forensics to ballistics all confirm he tried getting the the cops gun. Not to mention the 9 black witnesses who ALL testified that he charged the officer like a football player with his head down. Not one witness Black or white testified he was on his knees with his hands up. Thank you. I am well aware of what the transcripts say...I've been one of the few who's actually been citing and quoting it in most of these discussions. I wanted a citation to a legitimate source that says this version of the story was created and perpetrated by "opportunists from the liberal wing of the government and Democratic party", given that - factually speaking - the people who are giving this bastardized version of the story are the "eyewitnesses" (who couldn't keep their stories straight and/or admitted, under oath, they hadn't seen a thing), NFL-football players, and thug-wannabe opportunists looking for a *good* excuse to loot a few free TVs just in time for Christmas gift-giving. None of those are affiliated with the "government" - either from its "liberal wing" or from the conservative Bible-thumping branch and many are too young TO be registered with ANY political party. So, I'll still wait for the citation legitimate source that verifies the "Don't-Shoot-Arm-Uppers" are affiliated with the government and/or work for the Democratic party. Really, do you have a legitimate source with the "quotes" and "citations". And it seems that what one asks for is not what one really wants as it it there. The Dumbocraps are there in mass but it is so much easier to just deflect rather than reflect. |
|
|
|
... The fake news about the poor child who was "murdered" while his hands were in the air or shot in the back took off and was used by opportunists from the liberal wing of the government and Democratic party... Citation to a legitimate source for this presented-as-fact statement? Ah, so much, so much just where to begin. How about here: Gunshots, tear gas in Missouri town where police shot teen It's all there, just needs comprehension to understand. But "factually-speaking" the lack thereof will lead to a total denial. |
|
|