And just who would be the "Other critics"? You guessed it, the lawyers, judges, police and politicians that have skin in the game. The "green" skin, the folding kind, that which goes in the wallet.

But when it comes to drugs, it is much deeper than that, good ole big pharma is now involved. Can't have that unpatentable stuff from nature cutting into their profits now can we?

It is the idiots without weapons that make no sense. A world of slaves waiting to determine if they are allowed to survive. This is normally the mark of a person that has become ruled by their own emotions and sustain personality based in submissiveness and naivete.

Thankfully, the founders of this once great nation had no such schism and gave us the ability to live our lives as free people.

Another outstanding contribution.

Yeah, imagine that, Fox cheating to try and create discourse against the left, who would have thought?

But you give "Not so Fat Al" way too much credit, he is just another little puppet waiting for someone to pull his chain and direct his actions.

After all his puppet master is the FBI which is why he is immune. And what an asset, they seem to lend him out to most any agenda, wonder what the price is?

But if you have some time (about 1-1/2 hours), I would highly recommend: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAdu0N1-tvU G. Edward Griffin - The Collectivist Conspiracy

Sorry, but I think you may have been hoodwinked on that one, seems Fox news tied two different clips together and got caught.

Fox News Deceptively Edits ‘Dead Cops’ Chant Together With Al Sharpton Speech

There are a number of other sources that have the same claim. But while that isn't directly attributed to him, the constant stirring and agitation deems him not so innocent.

Spin as usual, first off, 1991 was more than a decade ago and Sharpton was there, not as fat as he was going to get but looking like the pig he is:





Million Man March

Rev. Al Sharpton speaks to the crowd while a member of the Nation of Islam stands guard at the Million Man March October 16, 1995, in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the march was to galvanize men to respect themselves and others spiritually, morally, mentally, socially, politically and economically. (Photo: Porter Gifford/Liaison)

But here is "fat" Al at his best:



And I guess it was out of convenience that you forget:


'Justice For All,' 'Millions March' draw tens of thousands of protesters, date line 12/23/14

"Million" would be an over optimistic appraisal considering the diminishing following of this race baiter.

And of course he stands for violence by his very actions. If he couldn't incite violence, Odumbo would dump him in a second. And his constant race baiting, only you would not feel that it was not a premonition of violence to follow.

Let's define cheap, the constant attempt of taking all topics and rendering them to a topic of your desire.

You are correct, I do not want to hear it unless it has to do with the topic of the thread. I offer you an opportunity under another thread to post to your hearts desire.

Now if you don't want to discuss the North Korean internet topic, then start something else.

Didn't forget at all, a little problem with comprehension?

Link repaired. Here is better video: St Louis police release video of final moments before shooting of Antonio Martin

Here is a source that provide three videos on the subject of ancient remains:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLw3AsroE_OEJURUlDwg55rJq89vRhCXp5

This has nothing to do with "angels" or "religion".

Then one would stop thinking, period. Like those that accept and those unable even to understand. But the good news is such a small percentage of righteous beings can bring about change.

And when this abortion of the elite fails, and it will fail in very short order, it will be the new beginning, but not the one you envision.

Thomas Jefferson and "The Blood of Tyrants"

But it is a stray god and god only knows the bad management that keeps the elite grabbing their heels.

url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFfEwgCW2to

And he was about to do just that and had to go. First he signed Executive Order 11110 that effectively shot the Fed. Then he and Robert were about to stop the Vietnam war. They were to proceed right after Dallas.

And then one of the first things Johnson did, retract Executive Order 11110 and the Fed tried to remove all the Silver Certificates in circulation as fast as they could get their hands on them.

Hey you got a definition right, congratulations. And the one that I use also, so much more to the point in a language much clearer than others. But then you are but trying to use the emotional to instill that which isn't there. You really should study the teachings of Mark, they would help to clear up so many shortcomings.

However, why we are on the subject, something you seem to subscribe to, let's put a little more definition behind this:



I do like this one but it is not so direct and to the point as mine. Yes mine, words framed by Mark but bought by me, hook line and sinker. In the infamous words of Mark, "There is nothing new here, I have heard this before somewhere else. This person covers this. I have read this in this book. Ladies and gentlemen, there is nothing new here, I am not going to present anything new."

But as to the other definition, I have no agreement, therefore I use quotes. As to source, well there is always google.

But that is not the end, other sources go into much more detail:



And from another:

Really, at the time Reagan was a real treat and he spoke about freedom and diminishing the role of government, but that wasn't what he actually did.

13 Reasons People Claim Reagan Was a Terrible President

But you do have to admit the guy had one heck of a presence, provided one heck of a smoke screen. After Jimmy Carter, he was a breath of fresh air.

But that little changes the fact he was no different than any of the other psychopaths that seek that office.

And the plot thickens:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHCD6GQ7dCw UN's One World Government Agenda-Wake Up Australia

Australia is at the forefront of pushing for the UN's Agenda 21, and Global Government. It's time to wake up, and get the message out.

You mean like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WviiQzdCB50 TPP Unraveling? Odumbo comes up empty handed again. Boy am I so glad he is on the side of the globalist, that buffoon could dry up a wet dream.

But then the deal is totally raveling as the veil is lifted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnC1mqyAXmw TPP: The Dirtiest Trade Deal You've Never Heard Of.

But the big question is just what kind of sick/diseased mind thinks this is some sort of acceptable behavior. Actually more than one disease:

Solipsism, the ideology that only one's own mind is sure to exist. Solipsists contend that knowledge of anything outside of one's own mind is unsure, hence there is no such thing as objective truth, and nothing about the external world and it's workings can actually be known. A perception they are god. Solipsist are mentally ill.

Statism, the brilliant idea that we give a small group of people the right to kidnap, imprison, harass, steal from and kill people, so that we can be protected from people who kidnap, harass, steal and kill people.

A statist is an individual who erroneously believes that there is such a thing as "authority" vested in certain human beings magically giving them the "right to rule" over other people. This "authority" means that certain people who we call "government", have the "moral right" to issue commands to those whom they rule (those under their "jurisdiction"), and that their "subjects" (slaves) have a "moral obligation" to obey the arbitrary dictates set by their masters. Most simply put, a statist is someone who believes in the legitimacy of slavery.

And it takes but 3% to 7% of a population to effect change and freedom has passed that threshold. At present we are in a peaceful resolution to the problems but at the same time are ready to defend our liberties with our lives, our fortunes and our honors.

The first to go will be the bankers as they detonate their own system to discover just like Arab Spring their failure to move forward. The second to perish will be the globalist government as nation after nation destroys anything in blue.

And last but not least, the City of London will be reduced to ashes as it should have been in 1215.

Many throughout history have tried and all have failed. And in today's world it will not take a number of years, the resistance is ready and will win even if it has to be with sticks and stones.

Fracking for the Cure

Well it seems the "pink ribbon woman is now "fracking" for the cure.

"In an outrageous move, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the largest breast cancer foundation in the United States, has partnered with a fracking company to promote pink drill bits "for the cure." The page looks like a parody, but it's completely serious. Baker Hughes, one of the dirtiest fracking companies in the world, in an industry that injects carcinogenic chemicals into our groundwater, is literally painting itself pink as a champion of women's health. And Komen is helping the company do it.

When pressed about this issue, Komen issued this tepid response: "the evidence to this point does not establish a connection between fracking and breast cancer." We cannot allow such absurd pinkwashing to stand. Baker Hughes isn't fighting breast cancer -- it's contributing to it. Join in telling Susan G. Komen for the Cure to drop Baker Hughes and stop giving dirty companies a cover.

Komen has a long history of controversy. In 2012 the foundation set off a firestorm by dropping its funding for Planned Parenthood, leading to the resignation of its then-CEO. Komen has also been hit with heat for trademarking the running pink ribbon and the phrase "for the cure," then using its legal team to go after other charity organizations that use the color pink and the word "cure." Critics accuse it of using such tactics in an attempt to monopolize the breast cancer market -- and this is what it's doing with its trademark.

Breast Cancer Awareness has turned into a multi-million dollar business -- Komen rakes in $400 million annually, in part through partnerships with dirty corporations that threaten the health of women -- and all of us. Komen partners with these groups because the money in the short term seems worth it, and the foundation thinks it can keep this story under wraps. But once knowledge of this gets out into the public space, Komen and Baker Hughes lose control of their stories, and we get to tell the world about their dirty partnership. Please join in today in calling out Komen and getting it to drop Baker Hughes as a partner."

It's all about the money, not the cure. If there were a cure, there would be no money.

UNESCO rejects Coalition's bid to delist Tasmanian World Heritage forest

"The Federal Government has lost a bid to delist more than 70,000 hectares of forest from Tasmania's World Heritage Area (WHA).

The United Nations' World Heritage Committee, meeting in Doha, took just 10 minutes to reject the Government's application to reverse protection for 74,000 hectares.

The area was part of 170,000 hectares added to the WHA last year under Tasmania's forest peace deal enacted by the former state and federal Labor governments.

News of the decision was quickly welcomed by conservation groups, including former Greens leader Bob Brown who described the decision as a "global diplomatic humiliation" for the Abbott Government.
External Link: Bob Brown forest delisting tweet

The Coalition had argued the 74,000 hectares were degraded by previous logging and should be unlocked for the timber industry.

But opponents to the move said only 8.6 per cent of the forests had been disturbed, with the rest being pristine old-growth rainforest.

Speaking from Doha, delegates from Portugal said "accepting this delisting would set an unacceptable precedent".

Wilderness Society campaign manager Vica Bayley said the decision showed the world was behind preserving the forest.

"Over here in Doha, environmentalists and Aboriginal Tasmanians are together welcoming this decision because it does protect the integrity of the Tasmanian World Heritage Area and it would protect that in perpetuity," he said."

The UN has told a sovereign nation what they can do with their forest. And while I don't really support a governments control of anything, I absolutely detest the UN having any say whatsoever.

What happens in Australia is up to the people of Australia but then they have sold their soul.