We have a two-party system. That is what the founding fathers designed. There will be no Independent candidates because they will have no bastion of support to rely upon to get out the vote.

Do you want big government (McCain) or bigger government (Obama).

Again, secure your wallets.

And to think liberals are the poster child for political correctness. It is only the left that squashes dissent. They do it on college campuses; they do it in newspapers; they do it in politics.

We shall see. But if he wins, secure your wallets.

Now that was a good one!

On a similar note I always wondered about those signs in Braille, e.g., near an elevator or a door. How do they know to reach there and feel? They can't see it. How would they know it was there?

Let me guess. He takes money from one group of people (let's call them "rich") and provides for another group of people (let's call them "poor"). Problem is, "rich" includes the middle class and the "poor" includes loafers.

If I like my own insurance, why does he have to mess with it? I mean, I picked it, I pay for it. What business is it of the government. Does he know what is good for me better than I know what is good for me? He must be one smart guy.

On the final point, I am referring to every citizen of the U.S.A. Now, for those that don't pay taxes, they may not care giving up everything. For the likes of me, I think it is fundamentally unfair to take the fruits of my labor and give it to someone else who didn't work for it.

I don't like anything about Obama because he is a typical tax and spend liberal. There is no "change" as he calls it; it is the tired old philosophy from the New Deal.

I'm seaworthy.

Other than Avery Johnson I cannot think of a good one that is available. Maybe it will an NBA assistant somewhere. Or may Tom Izzo from Michigan State.

Read the Declaration of Independence ("We hold these truths to be self evident, that all mean are created equal; Endowed by their CREATOR with certain inalienable rights"). Do you read the religious overtones in that?

Has he explained how he is going to pay for it?

Has he explained what will happen to my current plan that I kind of like?

Those who expect the government to give them everything must first give everything to the government.

Alright, I thought about it. Yes. Wait. Hell yes.

I'd have to think about it.

Golfing with the opposite sex is like going on a death march.

No attacks since 9/11. Prolly just luck. Nothing to do with Bush's policies. I bet his policies have actually made the terrorists more mad. Maybe if he played nice they would be nice back.

WTC bombing in '93; bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa. Bombing of the U.S.S. Cole. All these took place during Clinton administration. But I bet you leftists can find some reason to blame Bush for these events also.

If only the terrorists would play nice.

I laugh at the comment Reagan had nothing to do with it. Everyone said Reagan was dangerous; he would cause WWIII. He rebuilt our military, deployed missiles in Europe over strong left wing protests, funded freedom fighters from Nicaragua to Afghanistan, and called the Soviets for what they were: an evil empire.

Who would have thunk it in 1980 that the Soviet Union would collapse? No one.

Go to You Tube and play the Reagan's speech at the gate. The call of freedom; the idea that man is free.

"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." Hell, even Reagan's own State Department didn't want him to say this line.

Reagan assumed office the next day. Again, Reagan cut no deal.

Pour Some Sugar On Me by Def Leppard.

Now that there was funny.

Do you buy a car without taking it for a ride?

I would imagine Avery Johnson is on the short list.