Community > Posts By > Looking4honey

 
Looking4honey's photo
Tue 11/24/20 12:11 AM
Edited by Looking4honey on Tue 11/24/20 12:18 AM

The Michelson Morley experiment was designed to test the then still popular theory of the Luminiferous Ether, a substance thought to fill the universe and responsible for the transmission of light etc. They reasoned that any such substance must act in a similar fashion to water, causing retardation of objects at certain angels.
Their experiment (repeated several times with more sensitive equipment) failed to find this effect thus disproving the theory.
It did not 'prove' that the earth was stationary as you claim.


@Seamus
The Michelson Morley experiment set out to test the motion of the earth through the aether, the existence of aether was never in question. It wasn't until more than two decades later that Einstien tried to claim there was no aether in 1907 with his theory of relativity in an attempt refute the null result. In 1913 Georges Sagnac conducted an experiment that proved the existence of a static aether and falsified the relativity theory. The argument was made that the Sagnac experiment didn't account for rotating frames of reference thus was inconclusive. Finally in 1942 at the University of Paris Dufour & Prunier replicated the Sagnac experiment while accounting for rotating frames of reference thus, conclusively falsifying the theory of relativity.

The M&M experiment was successfully replicated by E.W. Silvertooth/USAF in 1986 and M&M's finding that the earth is motionless stands and is conclusive.

Looking4honey's photo
Sun 11/22/20 02:23 AM
@Seamus
Nah, I was getting D/C every few mins and couldn't post. The problem seems to have stopped now however.

The arguments here for the globe center around emojis, gaslighting and appeals authority. The video evidence I posted is the most damning **** ever, there's no coming back from the testable, measurable, repeatable proof there's no geometric horizon.

@Tom4Uhere
You're not even playing with a full deck here, even if the moon was illuminated by the sun (it is not) it would still be "lit". There no optical hotspot, that's game over for the claim the moon is a sphere lit up by the sun.

Also in regards to the modern world, every smartphone has sensors that employ the Sagnac effect, an effect that confirms the 1886 Michelson Morley experiment's findings that the earth is motionless. The effect also falsifies relativistic gravity.

Grab a pipe and smoke it boys!

Looking4honey's photo
Wed 11/18/20 12:47 PM
Nice, it logged me out and my lengthy and well articulated post got nuked. sad

Looking4honey's photo
Wed 11/18/20 10:30 AM
@Seamus

With a 200k+ year a job and pension + benefits they're not going risk being grounded and losing it all by rocking the boat. Commercial pilots all know it's flat.

Looking4honey's photo
Wed 11/18/20 10:15 AM
@Tom4Uhere

The moon is evenly lit with no optical hotspot, if it were infact a sphere illuminted by the sun the hotspot would be apparent.

The fact is we're inside an enclosed system, the sun, moon and stars are all small and close objects made of electrical plasma. The earth is stationary, flat and covered by a dome; we're inside an engineered structure with electric lighting.

The entire copernican/heliocentric model is a fraud, gravity i.e. the glue that holds it all together is an unproven theory. The reality is that objects that are more dense than their medium are pushed down just like a helium balloon gets pushed up. This mechanism of density and buoyancy is driven not by an unproven theory, but by an electric force known as the coulomb force that exists between the ground(-) and the dome(+).

Looking4honey's photo
Wed 11/18/20 09:54 AM
@Seamus

With a rim velocity of a 1000 miles per hour an 8000 mile wide flywheel made of dirt would explode. There's nothing un-scentific about that, in fact there's engineering software you can plug the numbers into see what nonsense it is.

The problem here is that somebody like yourself who's emotionally invested in the globe faith can never be reasoned out of your belief system, as it was never something you were reasoned into in the first place. Your fear of social ostracization and being mocked and humiliated by your peers is so overwhelming you'll never come to grips with it.

Looking4honey's photo
Wed 11/18/20 08:09 AM
@pumpilicious

That stuff is Flat. Neil DeGrasse Tyson -- https://youtu.be/jzh1hU2UpPs

Looking4honey's photo
Wed 11/18/20 08:05 AM
What's really funny are the folks who scream "science is awesome" then claim we're stuck to the surface of dirt flywheel spinning 1000 MPH in a vacuum. You can test whether earth spins 15 deg/hr with a precision mechanical gyroscope proven maintain its position in space at that speed, and it fails every time without exception.




Looking4honey's photo
Wed 11/18/20 01:04 AM
Here's a distance to the horizon calculator:
http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm

Here's documented video evidence that proves there's no geometric horizon (test it yourself):

https://data.troo.tube/videos/play.html#c=Taboo%20Conspiracy%20ii&v=Taboo%20Conspiracy%20ii/Simple%20Flat%20Earth%20Distance%20to%20the%20Horizon%20Test%20-%20Part%201%20-%201st%20Test-X8YrYoCyw0g

https://data.troo.tube/videos/play.html#c=Taboo%20Conspiracy%20ii&v=Taboo%20Conspiracy%20ii/Simple%20Flat%20Earth%20Distance%20to%20the%20Horizon%20Test%20-%20Part%202%20-%20Retest%20and%20Confirmation-GAdd4aidDbg

Youtube censored these videos, the guy (ben from taboo conspiracy ii) got his channel deleted for posting these videos.

Here's documented video evidence the earth does not move (test it yourself):
[Ultimate Flat Earth Proof] Stationary Flat Earth – The Gyroscope Doesn't Lie -- https://youtu.be/RF829QNKtT8

Go to beach and watch a boat disappear, then pull out your telescope and check it. The copernican/heliocentric model is a lie and fraud, we live on a stationary plain covered by a dome.

inb4 gravity, it's is an unproven theory, objects fall due to density and buoyancy driven by the coulomb force.