kooky

friendly debate... lol

I'm just saying.. at some point the freedom of speech has to be stunted. otherwise, hate crimes would run free and ya know I think its okay to hate someone, but acting on that hate and saying untruths is uncalled for.. see the attached..


Libel and slander are legal claims for false statements of fact about a person that are printed, broadcast, spoken or otherwise communicated to others. Libel generally refers to statements or visual depictions in written or other permanent form, while slander refers to verbal statements and gestures. The term defamation is often used to encompass both libel and slander.

In order for the person about whom a statement is made to recover for libel, the false statement must be defamatory, meaning that it actually harms the reputation of the other person, as opposed to being merely insulting or offensive.

The statement(s) alleged to be defamatory must also have been published to at least one other person (other than the subject of the statement) and must be "of and concerning" the plaintiff. That is, those hearing or reading the statement must identify it specifically with the plaintiff.

The statement(s) alleged to be defamatory must also be a false statement of fact. That which is name-calling, hyperbole, or, however characterized, cannot be proven true or false, cannot be the subject of a libel or slander claim.

The defamatory statement must also have been made with fault. The extent of the fault depends primarily on the status of the plaintiff. Public figures, such as government officials, celebrities, well-known individuals, and people involved in specific public controversies, are required to prove actual malice, a legal term which means the defendant knew his statement was false or recklessly disregarded the truth or falsity of his statement. In most jurisdictions, private individuals must show only that the defendant was negligent: that he failed to act with due care in the situation.

oogler.

oh and for pda,

snobbish

tease

your right it isn't.. and I hope every member of his church, switches churches... and that he is all alone in his views.

submissive

shiny

I think in this day and age, YES.. especially when it says that it is evil..

unusual

sparkley.

creative.

I think that when this church is teaching people to hate, they are teaching people to be predjudice, and most predjudice brings crime... Crime prevention, is all i'm saying...

(LOL I do wear optical perscriptions LMAO) but

beautiful

comes to mind once again.

Alls I can say is big girls/guys need loven too.. I personally do not care for morbid obesity, also, though I can't do anorexic skinny.. I'm a big girl and I don't have any problems meeting guys... I come here to meet friends.. but hey for real, I prefer guys who are taller than me... thats the big thing.. between 190 to 250 is good.. small guys tend to break easier.

Toes

slim

MMJ isn't so mean..

So are you saying its okay to commit hate crimes IE: call a guy at work a N.....??? that is a hate crime.

It is but.. for if you take into consideration the church out of Topeka that protests at funerals... I believe some states have made laws preventing this such behavior... as such I believe that church should be separated from state. This church obviously isn't for the separation though... This is why churches get burned down.. IMO...

is one of Jerry's main guests