Evidently you want a one sentence fits all answer... have some patience and actually read what i have posted.. then follow up with your own investigation..
I dont think you really WANT to know the truth... or you would do just that

you can circumnavigate your own neighborhood ... walk in a circle and come back to your house
There is no north south east or west on a ball?
That is just plain ol common sense.

Have you ever heard of the Antarctic treaty?
... this is why WE are unable to explore the full dimensions of our reality
I queued this to relevant info for you... if you have 20 minutes ... lol

https://youtu.be/J7nPw_qC5nU?t=1407

The video you sent is based on false positives... just like you want me to show you the edge and Im not claiming any such thing... it's easy to debunk your own false positives... try real science... observable, testable and repeatable... Thisis merely spinning off of a flat earth hitpiece... nothing more... try doing some real investigation, instead of googling "debunk flat earth".. this kind of nonsense s all you're going to come up with... what are you afraid of?

I am not claiming there is any edge... where do you get that idea?
Do you believe that space is infinite?... if so... why is it so hard to consider that the earth may be infinite?
Space is sci fi... everything you see in the sky is part of the Earth... is it so hard to believe that we might actually be special and not a random accident that exploded out of nothing?

There are other explanations for things
just take 10 minutes of your precious time here
and humor me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uxdntylhBo

Thanks for all that regurgitated pseudo psaence..
but I have already heard it
the sky moves, not the earth..
do some real research... you have a good head on your shoulders but a clear case of cognitive dissonance... you are simply repeating things what you have been told, not what you have actually experienced.. and not things based on observation, experimentation and evidence

Water always seeks level
the hoRISEon always RISES to eye LEVEL... no matter how high one ascends


make sense common again

Money has no inherent value.. it is based solely on debt, criminals printi it out of thin air... nothing backs it up... there is no difference in cryptos ... just a series of 1's and 0's in a computer .... just because people accept it for an "agreed" value, does not mean it HAS value... it is an agreement... agreements are in the mind and sometimes written on paper... still, they do not exist in nature

FLAT Earthers have studied more about the globe than any heliocentric believer (in such nonsense), has
Flat Earthers know more about orbital mechanics, propulsion in a vacuum, fluid mechanics, gravity, relativity, atmospheric refraction, perspective,,big bang, evolution, geology, astronomy, calculus, trigonometry, pressure systems, gyroscopes, sun dials, pendulums, line of sight convergence, putting 2 sticks in the sand, water level, centrifugal and centripetal forces , astrology, astronomy, satellites, Coriolis, Copernicus, Newton, Tesla, weapons testing, energy, frequency, Fibonacci, platonic solids, noble gases, weather systems, tides, eclipses, lunar and solar cycles, star trails, auroras, electricity, magnetism, buoyancy density, Antarctica and north pole expeditions, circumnavigation, piloting, space travel, escape velocity, moon landings, rocket science, dumb mass, mass attraction, art, deception, propaganda, star wars,submarines, torpedoes, periscopes, radio signals, camera lenses, telescopes, CGI fakery, mind control, and the military budget,...
... than any ball beLIEver knows about any single one of those things

Just as I suspected, someone who can quote Darth Vader

I am not quite sure what you mean

have you checked out RemedyCoin.com ?

This is one that my dear friend Joe has created and will revolutionize how we view the monetary system..

Money, as it stands, is based soley upon debt, it is an illusion, a mental construct,
Joe has created a crypto based on 'forgiveness'... a whole new ball game we're are about to play here

check it out
RemedyCoin.com

GREAT CIRCLE SAILING.

"AMONG landsmen a great amount of misconception prevails as to what is really meant by the so-called "great circle sailing;" and notwithstanding that the subject is very imperfectly understood, the "project" or hypothesis--for it is nothing more--is often very earnestly advanced as an additional proof of the earth's rotundity. But, like all the other "proofs" which have been given, there is no necessary connection between the facts adduced and the theory sought to be proved. Although professional mariners are familiar with several modes of navigation--"parallel sailing," "plane sailing," "traverse sailing," "current sailing," "middle latitude sailing," "Mercator sailing," and "great circle sailing," the "Mercator" and "great circle" methods are now the favourites. Nearly all the above systems necessitated the sailing by, or in relation to, Rhumb-lines, or lines at right angles to the meridian lines; and whether the earth is a plane or a globe, these are not geometrically at right angles to lines of latitude, except at the equator. Hence Mercator's projection, on account of its lines of latitude and longitude being square to each other, has been almost universally employed. But previous to the general adoption of Mercator's plan, many leading navigators saw that Rhumb-line sailing upon a globe was practically a series of small circles, and conceived

p. 280

of a method very similar to that which is now called the "great circle" system. As early as 1495 Sebastian Cabot suggested the adoption of this method. It was also advocated in 1537 by Numez, and in 1561, and subsequently by Cortez, Zamarano, and others. After lying dormant for a long time, the system was revived by Mr. Towson, of Devonport, who read a paper before the Society of Arts, in May, 1850, and afterwards presented his "tables to facilitate the practice of great circle sailing," to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty, who "ordered them to be printed for the use of all mariners."

Many persons suppose that the words "great circle sailing" simply mean that the mariner, instead of sailing in a direct line from one place to another, on the same latitude, takes a circuitous path to the south or north of this direct line, where the degrees of longitude being smaller, the distance passed over, although apparently greater, is actually less. It is then falsely argued that as "the greatest distance round is the nearest path," the degrees of longitude must be smaller, and therefore the earth must be a globe. This is another instance of the self-deception practised by many of the advocates of rotundity. It is really painful to reflect upon the manner in which a merely fanciful hypothesis has reduced its advocates to mental prostitution. The poor dawdling creature, who vaguely wanders in search of anything or everything which will satisfy her longings, is only a type of the philosophical wanderer who seeks for, and pounces upon, whatever will prove, or only seem to prove, his one idea--his uncontrolled and often uncontrollable longing for something to confirm

p. 281

his notions, and satisfy his desire to be wise and great. The motive which actuates the greater number of modern philosophers, cannot be less or other than the love of distinction. If it were a love of truth and of human progress and welfare they would scrupulously examine the premises on which their theories are founded. But this the advocates of the earth's rotundity and motion have seldom or never done. There is no single instance recorded where even the necessity for doing so is admitted. Hence it is that whilst to question the groundwork is forbidden, they abruptly seize upon everything which gives colour to their assumptions, although in many cases neither pertinent nor logically consistent. In the case before us the contraction or convergence of the degrees of longitude beyond the equator is unproved; and again if they were convergent there could not be a single inch of gain in taking a so-called great circle course between any two places east and west of each other. Let the following experiment be tried in proof of this statement. On an artificial globe mark out a great circle path, between say Cape Town and Sydney, or Valparaiso and Cape Town. Take a strip of sheet lead, and bend it to the form of this path; and after making it straight measure its length as compared with the parallel of latitude between the places. The result will fully satisfy the experimenter that this view of great circle sailing is contrary to known geometrical principles. Strictly speaking, it is not "great circle sailing" at all which Mr. Towson and the Lords of the Admiralty have recommended. The words great circle are only used in comparison with the small circles which are described in sailing upon a Rhumb-line track.

p. 282

"The fundamental principle of this method is that axiom of spherical geometry, that the shortest distance between any two points on the surface of a sphere lies on the line of a great circle; or, in other words, of a circle passing through the centre of a sphere. But maps and charts, being flat representations of the surface of a globe, are of necessity distorted, and are only correct near the equator, the distortion increasing as the poles are approached; and hence it follows that the course which on the globe is the shortest, is on the chart made to appear very much the longest, and the reverse. This was clearly shown to be the case by the comparison on a chart and on a globe of the course between Van Dieman's Land and Voldivia, on the western coast of South America: the course, which by the chart appeared to be a straight line, when laid down upon the. globe was found to be very circuitous, whilst the line of a great circle, cutting the two points, appeared on the chart as a loop of great length." 1

"Mercator and parallel sailing conduct the ship by a circuitous route when compared with the track of a great circle." 2

In nautical language Rhumb-line sailing, which was almost universally practised before the recent introduction of great circle sailing, consists in following parallels at right angles to the meridian lines, and as these meridian lines are supposed to be convergent, it is evident that the course of a ship so navigated is not the most direct; a great circle path is one at angles less than 90° north and

p. 283

south of the meridian. If the reader will draw a series of Rhumb-lines on a map of "the globe," he will at once see that the course is circuitous. But if he draws lines at a slight angle north in the northern, and south in the southern region, to the above-named Rhumb-lines, he will readily notice that the ship's course is more direct, and therefore the mariner adopting the so-called "great circle'' method, must of necessity save both time and distance, but only in comparison with the Rhumb-line path. It is not absolutely the shortest route; as the earth is a plane, the degrees of longitude in the south must diverge or expand, and spread out as the latitude increases; and the parallels or lines of latitude must be circles concentric with the northern centre. Hence there is in reality a still shorter path than either the Rhumb-line or the great circle course.

This will at once be evident on trying the following simple experiment. Place a light, to represent the sun, at an elevation of say two feet on the centre of a round table. Draw lines from the centre to the circumference to represent meridian lines. Mark any two places to represent Cape Town and Melbourne; now take any small object to represent a ship sailing from one of these places to the other, and, on moving it forward, keeping the light at the same altitude all the way the line of latitude or path of the ship will be seen to be an arc of a circle, which practically is a great circle route, whilst the Rhumb-line and greater route would be represented by a series of tangents to the meridian lines between the two places. The nearest route geometrically possible is the chord or

p. 284

straight line joining the ends of the arc which forms the line of latitude. Let this line or chord be drawn, and all argument will be superfluous, the proposition will be immediately self-evident.

Thus we have seen that great circle sailing is not the shortest route possible, but merely shorter than several other routes, which have been theoretically suggested and adopted; and to affirm that the results are confirmatory or demonstrative of the earth's rotundity, is in the highest degree illogical."
Footnotes

282:1 "From "A Paper on the Principles of Great Circle Sailing," by Mr. J. T. Towson, of Devonport, in the "Journal of the Society of Arts," for May, 1850.

282:2 "Treatise on Navigation," p. 50. By. J. Greenwood, Esq., of Jesus College, Cambridge. Weale, 59, High Holborn, London.

Zetetic Astronomy, by 'Parallax' (pseud. Samuel Birley Rowbotham), [1881],

I too grew up on the beach and was a sea captain of my own boat for 14 years

You would do well to learn the word, "allegedly"
your so called authorities have an agenda
the Earth is way bigger and has endless resources and lands that are hidden from you ... you are on a need to know basis

According to Admiral Byrd who has explored the north and south poles "There is an Area As Big As The United States on the Other Side of the South Pole"
(dont believe me?... you can hear him say it yourself in a 1950's interview)
Here's a photo of him from that interview, sitting in front of a Flat Earth map

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Finfoclinic.co.za%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F01%2FCaptain-Bird-FE-MAP-BACK-GROUND.jpg&f=1

and here's yer girlfriend
https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F1d%2Fe4%2F2d%2F1de42da7dd2c5a3ef699adc281e0cb12--flat-earth-proof-globe-earth.jpg&f=1

If you beLIEve you live on a globe... then get the money

"$10,000(TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS) CASH, WILL BE awarded to ANYONE who can provide ONE piece of FACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE evidence to support two things.
A). The CURVATURE of the alleged spinning ball earth
B). The MOTION of the alleged spinning ball earth"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4OGSbaQ5jI&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3qAQ8GsX759UpmJqsXs1JLtC7ADEqGLCw2m6Uo3S_ZE_CUbgYlldSZ8pA

the onus of proof is on the one making the claim... not the one denying it
get your facts straight

I suggest you read all of my posts here before you keep repeating the same things that have already been addressed

no one is claiming there is an edge... where did you get that idea?

The Earth does not move... the sky does
everything thing you see in the sky is part of earth... not the other way around
the sun and moon are not millions of miles away... they are exactly where they appear to be... close and local... look at how shadows behave... there are hundreds of real observations and tests you can do
ships do not disappear over any imaginary curve... get a telescope... wait for the ship to disappear beyond your line of sight convergence... then zoom in on it.. it will come back into view, HULL AND ALL
(depending on visibility clarity
why cant we see Hawaii from California?... lmao
you cant see to the end of a long hallway...
learn about perspective and how the eyes work before you get your foot stuck in your throat

‘This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.’

Here is another government document, this time from the FAA, entitled …

that makes a Flat Earth reference.

On page 32, It states …

So in other words, for all intents and purposes, unless you are traveling at above Mach 3, or intend to travel into low Earth orbit or higher, then you should just consider the earth to be flat.

But if the Earth was truly curved then this would not work.

For example if you were flying from Sydney, on the east coast of Australia to Perth in Western Australia you would have to travel a distance of 2034 miles.

The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles. That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be!

This fact alone proves the EARTH IS FLAT!

You can download the document directly from the FAA here.

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf

High altitude baloons at 120thousand feet record 360 degree footage completely level.... curvature has never been seen from any elevation... and the only photos that show curvature are with a fish eye lens ...
nice try.. but you're delusional
Next time you are on a plane.. look out the windows on BOTH sides and you will quickly realize that the horizon is at eye LEVEL ... if you were on a ball the horizon would fall away from you in all directions.. but it doesnt .. it remains at your eye LEVEL no matter how high you ascend..
learn about physics bro
If you THINK you see curvature it is because the windows are slightly convex to follow the hull of the plane... plus they are designed with multiple panes... watch a few videos and you will see that the same curvature that you THINK you see up in the air.. you will also see on the ground before the plane even takes off... lmao!
Man you people are slow

To everyone who is trying to say that YouTube is not credible and cannot be used.

It's literally ridiculous I have to explain this to you....

YOUTUBE IS NOT A SOURCE. It is simply a medium in which is used to transfer and spread information. A source is the actual content that is contained in the material and where it came from including authors. You can also find sources listed in the description below the video. ....lol there are not little elves sitting in the back of a sweat shop recording videos for YouTube.

If the source is valid then YES THE YOUTUBE VIDEO IS A GREAT WAY TO SHOW OTHERS YOUR PERSPECTIVE AND GIVE THEM VISUALS and YES it is VALID.

....... And the same thing applies to MEMES which are simply pictures with words as a description. If you've ever read a book you will find the same exact structure words and pictures. Visual aids are extremely helpful with comprehension.