Circumcision is done at 8 days old. I doubt Einstein was concerned about traditions at the moment of his life.




It's very good he did not have the Tesla approach.



hahaha ok.

Because Philip asked Him. And Yeshua explained.
iam_resurrected:

You are dodging my question and providing me with a cherry-picked verse that DOES NOT mean what you claim it means. Notice your cherry-picked verse below, in which you made a point of ignoring context (the usual routine of Trinitarians).

iam_resurrected said:
And what Yeshua explained is how Paul describes Yeshua in Colossians:


ܗܘ ܕܗܘܝܘ ܕܡܘܬܐ ܕܐܠܗܐ ܕܠܐ ܡܬܚܙܐ ܘܒܘܟܪܐ ܕܟܠܗܝܢ ܒܪܝܬܐ
15 who, that is to say, is The Image of Alaha {God} who is not seen.

This verse claims if we see the invisible God we see Yeshua, when we see Yeshua, we are seeing the invisible God!!

See that? You gave me a cherry-picked verse from Colossians 1:15, during which you you ignored the context to the verse. (Context refers to surrounding words within the verses, and surrounding verses and chapters within the same Bible book.) Notice part of the context to Colossians 1:15, which you chose to ignore, while you dodged my original question:

English Standard Version (Colossians 1:15)
He [Jesus/Yeshua] is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.

After you ignored the context to Colossians 1:15--which I bolded within my quotation--you proceeded to give me your personal philosophy, as follows:

iam_resurrected said:
What you refuse to accept, is that the Father is OMNIPRESENT. He could be in Heaven and in the flesh body as Yeshua at the same time!! He is God after all!!

Of course, you still have not answered my original question, as follows:

QUESTION #1 TO iam_resurrected: If Jesus/Yeshua and Jehovah the Father were one and the same why did Jesus/Yeshua inform his disciples: "THE WORDS that I have spoken to you DO NOT COME FROM ME"?


QUESTION #2 TO iam_resurrected: According to Colossians 1:15, Jesus/Yeshua is the firstborn of all CREATION." YES or NO?


NeutralZone2

________________
... be swift about hearing, slow about speaking, slow about wrath...." (James 1:19-20)






I do not follow nor believe in the idealism that is known as the Trinity!!

Get that through your brainwashed mind!!
I believe in ONE GOD, He is known in the Torah as ELOHIM, "I AM THAT I AM!!" He is known in the Aramaic/Greek New Testaments as "The Father."

To find the best answers for this and many questions of the New Testament, is to read what our "ONENESS CHURCH FATHERS," 1 or 2 generations from the actual Disciples/Apostles and using same language to know the true meaning of what was being written.

What they wrote, the Apostles baptized in Book of Acts in Name of Yeshua, Peter COMMANDED to be Baptized in Name of Jesus. Timothy baptized the Eunuch in Name of Yeshua like in Chapter 19, Paul baptized in the Name of Yeshua.

Yeshua is the WORD, the spoken W.O.R.D. from God.

You speak words, those words you speak only reflect you, and no one else.

This is God and how His Spoken WORD works. God speaks, the (His[God's]) WORD then does what was spoken. But the ONE SPEAKING and the ONE DOING are not 2 different Deities, they are ONE and the SAME DEITY. One God using 2 perspectives to fulfill His work. And the Holy Spirit is the personal Spirit of God.

Genesis 3:6 explains that, Yeshua explains (or the Father speaking through His WORD), and Paul explains it.

Paul confirms 2 times that God is ONE PERSON, the Fathers. Mark 12 proves that Yeshua confirms God is One Person, the Father to/with the Scribe.



You have a Bible that is a translation and thoughts of the person WHO TRANSLATED your Bible. But your bible is a translation of Latin Vulgate, translated from the Greek and Hebrew. There is the Aramaic version which is extremely valuable. It's the actual language Yeshua spoke, His Disciples, the Pharisees and others. Of course they spoke Greek and Latin with the Romans, but their language amongst themselves would be native like their Aramaic.

So to know the real factual truths, I read the Torah and the Aramaic with Greek. Yes, I have my English KJV Dake's, but when I compare that to these the originals, wow, there is a lot of missing information plus adding by the English writers. Definitely personal beliefs, not real scriptural facts.

So no, There is only ONE GOD, the FATHER!! But the WORD is a part of the FATHER, because it is the action portion to what the FATHER is saying. The WORD is not an actual Son. It's a Son on basis that all flesh humans are Son/Daughters of God created in His Image. No, the WORD is really the Spoken portion of the Father.

The Messiah is described as the Right hand of Power by the Prophets. God was this Big One Person, but the Messiah would be God's Big One Body actual Right Side representing the Power of God (the Action of what God speaks and Commands). Yeshua is not only the Messiah, but the Spoken WORD of the Father, making the Speaker and the Action of the WORD the SAME PERSON.

This is why there is even a portion of scripture from Paul claiming, Yeshua is the physical Image to the Father's Invisible Image. Or, when Yeshua looks into a mirror He sees Himself as the Father, and when the invisible Father looks into a mirror He sees Himself as the WORD!!

Personally, on his own account and merit of sound mind, he would easily have denounced his Jewish traditions. He was looking at a place somewhere within his current Universe, and was witnessing first hand at glimpses of serenity, harmony, peace, and determined this is Who God really is. And it does not have to match Spinoza's identically to be considered similar views.

What Einstein could not conceive, was the idea of this place of Awesomeness, Serenity, Harmony, Peace, being concerned about small matters like life.

And that is where we must remember that Darwin's Theory was meant to be a model of how we keep standards to continue learning. His Theory never was completed and he picked at it until his death, looking for his missing links and reasoning.

Einstein took for grant it the things he would not be aware of after their change, like the Theory of Evolution with proofs of DNA. It would be interesting to know, Einstein's thoughts concerning DNA.

Not every Deity and gods/goddesses were about the point you are trying to make. Some were made in the idea of war, others made in the idea of peace, so it automatically creates good vs bad scenario.

But you do make an excellent point because people do not have the passion to care for someone or themselves. People wanted the "Me Movement" and it has erupted to a complete full scale of my wants first.

No matter how much a message is stretched, the idea being understood is "Self," when it was instructed to be "Selfless."


It's a far cry from what should be happening. People have become complacent. Even leaders have lost their zeal and for some it's all about the "Big Show."

And yet, Einstein defined his own beliefs based upon the Deity of Spinoza. That does not mean Einstein agreed with Spinoza, but that his idealisms were more in line with his own.

Yes, God obeys the Rules He Created, because they are true in every sense. God may set in motion, but what diverts that motion is generally interference.

You do know, the God they are speaking about, they are claiming He did this by His Reasoning. The fact that it works and can be calculated, is just like what Galileo stated, "Mathematics is the Alphabet by which God created the Universe." He was Catholic, which most everything was Catholic back then.

Outside the fact that once you get past Spinoza's valid attempt at physically characterising God (God is the only substance in the universe, and everything is a part of God. “Whatever is, is in God, and nothing can be or be conceived without God”[3].), he does make a bright action by giving skills to God.

He begins, ( Spinoza says that man’s ideas do not come from himself, but from some sort of external cause). And ends with God is "Thought and Extension."


So, due to God's Thought of Gravity, being something pulled to the bigger energy force. He could have Thought it to be just the opposite, to where apples do rise as they fall.

But what purpose would that serve when Gravity, Electromagnetics, Force, Energy, Speed have a purpose for keeping God's Thought together? It's only an explanation to attempt some form of logic at what we believe is happening. We only assume we know every Law of Physics. We have only given our terms to those we have witnessed. There is a Reason and actual Harmony to the flow of Everything. And those Laws that keep the Universe growing while individual Galaxies are being maintained, are also keeping Life itself in its many forms safe and subject to those Laws.

As once mentioned, to God, the Universe is contained. It's His Personal experience. It's like set up in a display that God oversees. Nothing would ever be able to grow beyond what and Who God is. So to us, as the Universe expands, it is reaching its purpose to God.

I do like Einstein, but sadly he had many learned traits. If he could have been gifted in his emotions, he would not have been a genius in his vision, he would have been someone who could relate on many levels and areas that actually mattered in life.

To Einstein, the Universe was limitless.
To God, the Universe is contained.

To Einstein, the universe had harmony.
To God, the universe has Design and Order.

To Einstein, God had no power over the Laws in place.
Einstein was also 50 years before the KOBE Expedition, and an upgraded definition to the Bang to which these Laws Einstein speaks about resulted from the Bang. He was before recents I.D. discussions and Krausse' conclusions plus others. One might think the newer discoveries in the "Bang Theory" would have reformed Einstein's views.

I am sorry you never was able to be present and old enough to have witnessed your Grandfather. And you should get those recordings audible. You have your own idealisms and are a grown adult. But since it is your Grandfather, you might find what he preaches actually does relate to how You currently view life. He just did it in his own way. But the point is, you can see that when they speak, especially when it's no visual, only audible. You will hear him as if he is just talking about one of his many views of life. And it's Your Grandfather. He is part of the reason You exist. True Family Revelation.

And you claim to have a broad view in even claiming your beliefs as you have done. You might just find some humor in the experiment. Who knows.

I am researching who is involved currently with these advanced robotics. A few months back there was a video that involved Elon Musk, the CEO's of mega site chats, and a few investors speaking about what silicon valley is currently working pertaining to the quantum technologies. But this video was more about AI's taking over full control and becoming a kind of think tank on its own. These leaders at the forefront of technology are convinced they have created a machine that will figure out it can control itself and be self reliant.




Anyways, this seems to be a good read. It's rather recent and you have most likely already mentioned this.

https://www.nap.edu/read/18801/chapter/6

4
Technical Analysis and Affordability Assessment of Human Exploration Pathways

4.1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

4.2 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
4.2.1 Possible Destinations in the Context of Foreseeable Technology
4.2.2 Design Reference Missions
4.2.2.1 The Space Launch System and the Design Reference Missions
4.2.2.2 Asteroid Redirect Mission
4.2.2.3 Earth-Moon L2
4.2.2.4 Lunar Surface Sortie
4.2.2.5 Lunar Surface Outpost
4.2.2.6 Asteroid in Native Orbit
4.2.2.7 Mars Moons
4.2.2.8 Mars Surface
4.2.3 Potential Pathways
4.2.4 Drivers and Requirements of Key Mission Element Groups
4.2.4.1 Launch
4.2.4.2 In-Space Transportation
4.2.4.3 Habitation
4.2.4.4 Entry, Descent, Landing, and Ascent
4.2.4.5 Destination Systems
4.2.5 Contribution of Key Mission Elements to the Pathways
4.2.6 Challenges in Developing Key Capabilities
4.2.6.1 High-Priority Capabilities
4.2.6.1.1 Mars EDL
4.2.6.1.2 Radiation Safety
4.2.6.1.3 In-Space Propulsion and Power
4.2.6.1.3.2 In-Space Cryogenic Propulsion
4.2.6.1.3.3 Nuclear Electric Propulsion
4.2.6.1.3.4 Nuclear Thermal Propulsion
4.2.6.1.3.5 Solar Electric Propulsion
4.2.6.1.4 Heavy-lift Launch Vehicles
4.2.6.1.4.1 Space Launch System
4.2.6.1.4.2 Falcon Heavy
4.2.6.1.5 Planetary Ascent Propulsion
4.2.6.1.6 Environmental Control and Life Support System
4.2.6.1.7 Habitats
4.2.6.1.8 Extravehicular Activity Suits
4.2.6.1.9 Crew Health
4.2.6.1.10 In Situ Resource Utilization (Mars Atmosphere)
4.2.6.2 Additional Capabilities
4.2.6.3 Summary of Challenges in Developing High-Priority Capabilities
4.2.7 Affordability
4.2.7.1 Potential Budget Available to Human Spaceflight Beyond LEO

4.3 TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS
4.3.1 NASA Technology Programs
4.3.2 Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate
4.3.2.1 Exploration System Development
4.3.2.2 Exploration Research and Development
4.3.2.3 Commercial Spaceflight
4.3.2.4 Space Technology Mission Directorate
4.3.2.5 NASA Infrastructure
4.3.3 Commercial Programs
4.3.4 Department of Defense
4.3.5 International Activities
4.3.6 Robotic Systems
4.3.6.1 Robotic Science and Exploration
4.3.6.2 A Game Changing Vision of Robotics

4.4 KEY RESULTS FROM THE PANEL’S TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND AFFORDABILITY ASSESSMENT






Would appear there is sort of a game plan in place. Finances seem to be the biggest obstacle. And the time frame of their schedule is maybe a couple of lifetimes away. They must be hoping for some billionaire to screw his family over and donate their inheritances to NASA!!

But what do you think of sending AI's to the Moon?
That could be prepping for something being discussed within this thread.
Planet to Planet multi-trips and building a robot crew to build the infrastructure to a new system safe for humans who go.

I think that is awesome you think this way.
Just shows no one is the same.
That's cool!

It's a bad trait I work on daily. I'm a December birth myself.

Isn't (H)aving no need for anything, actually the best reason to Create something?

You are God so you are capable of entertaining yourself by your ideas, designs, measurements, the Beginning Point, His purpose for doing this, experiment over!!

And if He did choose this route, what's to say He has never made a form of contact between Himself and His Creation?

I don't care what some phd moron claims, Life is not an Accident!!

When your Grandfather preached, were you old enough to remember, or just remember being in the church building he preached at, or was not born yet, or was not old enough to understand?

I do respect that your choice in life is not to believe. My choice is to believe. And the reason I do point out what I do, concerning scripture and its origins, is because I was raised by those who some have classified as scholars. So I am more than just interested. I enjoy being able see the scriptures for what they were meant to be. Everything in life is about some form of the "Truth." That is what knowing what the original languages were stating, can do for someone's Faith!!

True, but they are not structured at a scale where the entire animal kingdom exists at.

I love how bacteria helps the earth, that helps plants who produce food and cleaner air, that helps the insect, who can help germs that at times benefit all animal Species, who reproduce themselves, and some become the eater and some the food. It's all a birthing process giving to the next Species. Which clearly reveals a Design.

Why Not?

What is to say the Higher Knowledge has a great sense of humor.
What better way to play that mental game than by tossing the proverbial curveball once in awhile.

Technically, the female human has eggs that require fertilization. Technically, that life form is in sort of egg sac until birth. As are ALL Species!!

The only difference between laying eggs and carrying eggs are the amount of eggs that get fertilized.

This really is a common sense question/answer and not one that presents much difficulty at all!!

Pew Research did a study on the Mental Illness of Atheist and Non-Believers in God vs Believers in God:

The Results:

Much research indicates that religious people as a group tend to have better mental health than the ‘nones’ as a group. This is manifest in various indicators, including lower rates of depression, anxiety, suicide, self-harm, and substance use among the religious.


Richard Dawkins himself has joked about atheists possibly being ‘despairing neurotics driven to suicide by relentless cosmic angst’ because they lack the emotional and psychological consolations of religion.