100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > Easttowest72
|
Topic:
TODAY IN TRUMP LAND
|
|
If I was paying millions in taxes I would be searching for loopholes too. Don't worry dems. Whatever Trump didn't pay in tax was taxed in another way. If he bought something he paid tax and probably property tax, if he saved it, he paid tax on interest received. People better hope Trump keeps working and creating businesses to keep their foodstamps flowing. Instead of bitching and crying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
A Desperate Agenda
|
|
K didn't lie about getting drunk and partying. He admitted it. What he said was he never got drunk enough to black out or rape someone without remembering it. So let keep focused on the rape charge. Her lying to catching up to her and dem want to focus on k drinking beer and partying. He already admitted to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you were assaulted and trying to get home, you would definitely remember how you got there. It's not just any party she is trying to remember. Can't even remember whose party it is. Because all these people would be investigated and would say it never happened. But since she conveniently doesn't remember it changes back to k got drunk at a party and the focus goes away from the assault. It's a disgraceful tactic by the Democrats to slander k and ruin his career. The FBI should investigate Ford for a false report and conspiracy. A long with other democrats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teenagers getting drunk and having sex wouldn't have been at any house. Somebody's parents were out of town or one had sorry parents. Ford should remember whose party because of that. I would believe k did might have done something if she admitted she was blacking out is why she can't remember details. But getting drunk at the party doesn't take her memory of whose party it was and how she got there. She is a liar and doesn't have those key people to be investigated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I went to 1 party at 15. It was in the basement of a bank up town. The chaperones were Sandra and Dianne. My mom dropped me off in her brown caprice classic. When she picked me up my brother (who was 16 and liked to drive) was driving. The only guy I danced with was bill. That was only 31 years ago but people have memories when they aren't drunk off their *****. I get that she might not remember the address but she should remember who the host was to be able to identify the party. I get that she might not remember who took her their but desparatly trying to leave should retain the memory of how she did. These details are key points in the investigation. She doesn't want witness to say her story isn't true. No host, etc, takes away the investigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
TODAY IN TRUMP LAND
|
|
It's called loopholes. I bet he also wet the bed back then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is not/was not a trial. If it were a criminal trial, the burden of proof would be beyond a reasonable doubt, where as in a civil case the burden of proof is only more likely than not. That is why, and i use this case because of its notoriety, OJ SIMPSON was found not guilty in criminal court, but went on to be found liable in CIVIL Court. As I said, it is unlikely the beyond a reasonable doubt could be proven, but the more likely than not could, IF THIS WERE A TRIAL which it is not. at stake here is a review of character for a position on SCOTUS. If it is found that the candidate was lying to the commission, about anything from a drinking problem to writing all his gatherings on a calendar, that could be the end of the road for him. With the current borg mentality blind party loyalty however, and being he is the candidate of the current majority party, I will be surprised if they conclude he was lying no matter how many classmates come forward to contradict his story. There is some urgency, for some reason, that THIS candidate be in the court. It's clear Ford is a liar and it's a delay tactic. They've let her make a fool of herself and spending a week investigating a party with no address or host sometime in the 80's. They should start with the person who drove her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
A Desperate Agenda
|
|
It isn't k that can't remember. It's Ford whose story is full of holes. The FBI needs to investigate her 1 beer story and not knowing how she got home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
people dont remember every moment of every day of their life, especially after time passes. they do remember traumatic experiences, and they generally can recall what they have done from DAY TO DAY, which is different than from decade to decade. And again FORD is not nominated for SCOTUS, Kavanaugh is. and if he will lie about little things about the meaning of what he put in his year book or his partying life back then, what else might he lie about? that is going to be the main barrier for him. She cant prove he did what she claims. But an investigation could uncover he lied about the things he did or did not do or say back then. FORD IS THE ACCUSER. IT'S HER JOB TO PROVE SHE IS TELLUNG THE TRUTH. You might not remember everything. But if you've just been assaulted and trying to get home, you would remember how you did. Seems the only thing she can remember is only having 1 beer. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He said he was drinking beer and still does. What's Ford's excuse for memory loss? I'll wait.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How can he defend himself against an accusation at a party without an address, date, or even adults driving kids? I'll wait for liberals to explain. I'm sure it will change to k drank too much water during the interview so he must be guilty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If ford cant remember where the party was, when it was, how she got there, or how she got home, she might be the one with the drinking problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
A Desperate Agenda
|
|
Democrats opened a can of worms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Measuring the economy
Edited by
Easttowest72
on
Mon 10/01/18 11:10 PM
|
|
The sheep in America are going along with the crazy liberal media. They don't appreciate the jobs and great economy. Africa is a shithole. That's why we send them money. The media tells the sheep it's racist and they follow along. They don't have the mentality to see Africa is a shithole for themselves.
Trump made some comments a long time ago about women letting men with money and power do whatever they want. The sheep think it's sexist. They can't see that women like stormy would go down on a donkey if it was wrapped in $100 bills. They can't think for themselves. They are offended because the media told them to be. They want the deep state back in power. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
A Desperate Agenda
|
|
I don't see k as being a player. I would easily believe he was a virgin until his 20's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Measuring the economy
|
|
Democrats want the lazy people to vote for them. I think news media wants rating. Some of the thinks liberals come up with is so crazy it's entertaining to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even her buddies won't back her up on her story. You would think some of them could remember where the party was and who picked her up. The Democrats need to pick a better liar next time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing but red flags in her claim. She didn't say anything to her shrink that ties this claim to k. If it wasn't about delaying the vote, she wouldn't have waited 36 years to be TRAUMATIZED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
A Desperate Agenda
|
|
K's character isn't defined by a person making a false claim or a beer he drank at 15 years old.
The longest I've known anyone to stay in the military is 30 years putting them at 47 years of age. The military is known for drinking and partying. Judges aren't. I see liberals are trying to turn k into an alcoholic since rapist didn't work out for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My point was there is no monopoly on 'expertise'. There are any number of 'experts' related to the substance of this issue. Sex trauma Experts, prosecutors, attorneys, body language experts, who are all weighing in, and not coming to any one sided consensus one way or the other. I also would not imagine a prosecutor taking the case, being that women have such a hard time proving these allegations, especially when actual consummation did not take place which is probably why she is not asking for the police to charge him with a crime. The issue is the potential CHARACTER of a SCOTUS NOMINEE, because it is possible to be of poor character even if one has not crossed the line of being guilty of a crime. IF a woman has gone through a trauma, there is absolutely NO Reason she deserves any less than to be heard. IF there is something to it, let it come to light. If nothing comes to light, let things move on. But her being heard was the right and NECESSARY thing to have happen, ESPECIALLY, in my opinion, if there seems to be no monetary motivation or gain for HER in doing so. She doesn't want to have him charged with a crime because she can't. She can't even tell where or when it happened so he can defend himself. She just wants to ruin his reputation and delay this vote for the Democrats. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
