100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
|
Um. The photon belt? um? Yup, and the government is putting tracking devices in underarm deodorant but only Old Spice. Algore said so.  
So THAT"S why that stuff itches.  I HATE itchy pit. 
lolol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
khvnp1l0t
on
Tue 01/22/08 04:28 PM
|
|
Um. The photon belt? um?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone I've ever worked with has called it global 'climate change' as oppose to 'warming', because it will do just that, change the climate. Some areas will heat up, some wil lcool down, some might stay the same.
I don't know what to think about it, but putting all that extra carbon into the air from underground can't be the best thing o.O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
DONT DRINK THIS!!!!
|
|
x.x
My friend drinks that crap like a Hummer drinks gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Girl in a Wheelchair
|
|
awwwwwwwwwwwwww lmao
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
What's the Wildest....
|
|
I got a knife pulled on me downtown after I offended some guy with my urban mountain biking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
911 conspiracy
|
|
There are a lot of things which seem inexplicable, but has there ever been a building of that size put under that sort of structural stress before? Maybe that's just how big buildings fall. And I know that there are engineers who say it shouldn't have happened that way, but sometimes science mis-predicts real life results. And it was an honest question as to whether there have been any comparable building collapses...I don't know whether there have been or not. From what I know the towers depended on a central core of steel to stay standing. I remember hearing that, since the strength of steel decreases quite a bit with exposure to fire, the cores of the towers weakened and the top however-many floors just fell on top of those below. The steel core not being designed to take the upper part of the building falling rather than resting on it, the whole structures gave way. A friend I hae who is in cnstruction told me that the steel in large buildings is supposed to take the heat of a fire for a specific amount of time, but the fires ignited first by the jet fuel in the planes and then fueled by whatever combustible material in the ofices was both longer and hotter than what the engineers anticipated a normal office fire to be. That theory sort of makes sense to me, but my question is - if there was so much smoke (as is evident in any picture of the towers just before they fell), how could the fires be burning so strong? Doesnt a smoke-billowing fire indicate an oxygen-starved, and therefore weak fire? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Greetings
|
|
Thanks all :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hatebreed - Destroy Everything
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seems pretty cool to know
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
why do you think ur single??
|
|
I'm too much of a badass.
Seriously, 5 times straight that I've been cheated on, I guess its something I don't even see in myself :P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
im getting fat..
|
|
its not called fat .. its called Love Puggie lolllllllll you dont look fat on this end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Greetings
|
|
Heyy everyone! I've been a member on the site for a while but this is my first post in the forums...hope I meet some cool people! :)
|
|
|
|
|
